In its new study ‘The Market for Aircraft Carriers and Amphibious Warfare Ships’, Forecast International projects that a total of 98 ships will be produced from 2019 through 2028.

The value of this production is $65.4 billion.

“The market for aircraft carriers and amphibious warfare ships is expanding steadily, outweighing any other in the maritime sector, and is of profound worldwide importance,” said Forecast International senior warships analyst Stuart Slade.

Of the total number of ships forecast for production, eight are aircraft carriers, comprising two each for Britain and the United States, one for India, and three for China. These eight ships represent 8.16 percent of the unit total for this sector but have an aggregate value of $31.4 billion, 48 percent of the sector total.

A recent decline in the proportion of funding devoted to aircraft carriers reflects a marked slowing of the Indian programme. The amphibious warfare component includes amphibious warfare ships and craft, a segment that includes large amphibious transports of varying types down to air-cushion landing craft, say the firm in a press release.

This market overview covers aircraft carriers ranging from large warships carrying a mixed, multipurpose air group exhibiting the highest performance characteristics to amphibious assault ships that primarily carry transport helicopters, with a limited number of VSTOL aircraft tasked with a restricted number of missions.

“The linkage of these two sectors within a single market overview may seem idiosyncratic, but there are solid operational and technical reasons behind doing so,” said Slade.

“Operationally, the distinction between an aircraft carrier and a large amphibious assault ship is indistinct.”

Even the big U.S. Navy CVNs, the largest and most powerful warships in the world (not to mention by far the most expensive), have at times embarked helicopters and Marines to carry out amphibious operations. The amphibious warfare ships have, when the situation demands, served as small aircraft carriers. The technical link is that the design and to a large extent the size of these ships are determined by the demands of the aircraft they carry.

Forecast International is a provider of Market Intelligence and Consulting in the areas of aerospace, defence, power systems and military electronics and specialises in long-range industry forecasts and market assessments.

18
Leave a Reply

avatar
8 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
26 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
13 Comment authors
Paul THelionsDaveyBJohnHartleySteve R Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Ian
Guest
Ian

Being such costly assets, can someone point out to me where the third phalanx is sited on QE? Or where she is protected port-side? Do I assume the third is yet to be fitted…and will we see her enhance CIWS by mounting 2 banks of 10 Martlet (20 missiles) to the Bushmaster? Or do we wait for Iran to produce mass drones to compliment its mass boat swarming capabilities? As we know, all you may need is enough time/defence till Airborne assets destroy the source, which I hope Britain, the US, and likely Israel are prepared for. I’m sure we… Read more »

Julian7
Guest
Julian7

‘By George Allison’ ???

‘Copied and Pasted by George Allison***’

Source:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/08/05/1896664/0/en/Market-for-Aircraft-Carriers-and-Amphibious-Warfare-Ships-Will-Total-65-4B-over-Next-10-Years.html

Why not rewrite it in your own words?

Or at least reference your plagiarism.

Expat
Guest
Expat

UK seem extremely poor in productising our ships for export, the T31 is the first attempt to do this. T26, whilst successful, was not designed at the outset to be an exportable product. Take Damen for example they actually have a product range of ships. The UK yards definitely need to get better at this if they are going to survive without government handouts and tap into some of these potential markets.

Helions
Guest
Helions

It’s going to be very interesting to see what the future holds for large deck carriers and amphibs. The USN is currently in the process of reexamining survivability for these classes of vessels in the event of full scale war. It’s my belief that the U.S. will not commit the carrier force to battle in areas covered by area denial envelopes until they are “softened up” by other other assets such as submarines and standoff (air and sea) launched cruise missiles and intermediate range ballistic missiles. Other tactics might include this “back to the past” scenario being examined by the… Read more »

Cam
Guest
Cam

When’s HMS Bulwark and Aalbion set to be sold I mean replaced.

Helions
Guest
Helions

Looks like the RN is going to join the USN in the Gulf…

https://www.navytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/08/05/uk-joins-us-in-strait-of-hormuz-naval-security-mission/

It’s always the same. The U.S. and the UK carrying the water (admittedly France does much as well) while other rich nations take the freeloaders route….

Cheers

Martin
Guest
Martin

Time to up gun T45 with sea ceptor and 16 Strike length VLS for TLAM and LRASM, amazing ships just not finished properly but easy enough to fix with a bit of cash and some will from government.

David
Guest
David

I agree completely Martin but sadly I doubt it will ever happen – FFBNW….. what a curse!

Steve R
Guest
Steve R

This to me is one of only 2 problems with Type 45. 1) lack of offensive weaponry. Seems crazy to me that any naval task force we send would rely solely on Harpoons from Type 23s and Spearfish torpedoes from what would likely be a single Astute sub.

The second problem is quite simply not enough ships of the class. I know it’s impossible to build any more Type 45s but would it be possible to build two of the Type 26 frigates as air defence variants?

Helions
Guest
Helions

Even the USN’s previously sacrosanct carriers are getting a second look.

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/08/06/with-mounting-questions-about-cost-and-survivability-a-shifting-political-landscape-for-us-aircraft-carriers/

With the evolving idea of distributed warfare, ANY surface combatant should be armed to the teeth with whatever can be crammed aboard it to prepare for the day when the carrier is no longer King. The naval fight will probably carried out by widely deployed and networked destroyer / frigate / submarine type combatants firing advanced missiles with anti submarine and mine sweeping work mostly the domain of drones IMO…

Cheers

DaveyB
Guest
DaveyB

The future is going to see more and more use of both autonomous and remotely operated unmanned vehicles working in concert with a ship. With these types of vehicle screening the ship as a scout or as an added layer of defence.
The day of the carrier will never be over, unless an enemy can fully swamp an area with a plethora of weapons that can get through the defensive screens of aircraft, ships and subs.

Helions
Guest
Helions

I agree with your position that carriers will have a place in naval warfare for the foreseeable future Davey. They will merely become another asset to be deployed when the threat to them has been reduced. I can see the USN keeping about 6 CBGs in the future and using them for scenarios other than the primary war fighting platforms with all other ships subordinate to them in the USN hierarchy as they are now. I also agree with your assessment of the role autonomous systems will play in the future. Aside from the sub hunting and mine sweeping duties,… Read more »

Paul T
Guest
Paul T

Regarding building more Type 45’s. -Politically and Practically impossible yes, Physically impossible no.

JohnHartley
Guest
JohnHartley

Well Boris has been spending like a drunk on a Saturday night, but I fear most of that will go to the “usual suspects” i.e. city fees, management consultants, overpaid, virtue signalling public sector non jobs, rather than anything of any use to the public.
One billion on a RN, British built version of the 32000 ton Trieste assault carrier the Italians are building, would be good. Put it in Plymouth for the Royal Marines.