The British Army’s 34 Wildcat battlefield reconnaissance helicopters will begin to be retired from 2027, with the Ministry of Defence saying that uncrewed systems will take over the task of scouting ahead of friendly forces, officials said.

Officials setting out the Defence Investment Plan said the retirement reflected a wider shift in the balance between crewed and uncrewed aircraft and pointed to the Wildcat as one of the clearest examples of where that change now applies, with one official arguing that sending a crewed helicopter forward over enemy lines to search for targets by eye “doesn’t feel like it makes any sense in a modern battlefield,” a judgment they tied both to the threat such aircraft now face and to the experience of Ukraine, where small drones have absorbed much of the reconnaissance role at far lower cost and far lower risk to people.

In place of the Wildcat the department said it would invest in new uncrewed technology to carry out the same scouting job, as part of a broader Army push into drones, electronic warfare and networked sensors under what it calls its recce strike concept, and the move sits alongside additional funding for Army lethality that takes in both basic and more advanced drones as well as longer-range fires. Launching the plan, Sir Keir Starmer said the government would build “an army that is 10 times more lethal,” with attack drones flying alongside Apache helicopters and “a new fleet of surveillance drones, collecting intelligence and finding targets,” which is much the work that crewed reconnaissance helicopters such as the Wildcat have until now carried out, while Defence Secretary Dan Jarvis said the plan put more money into increasing the British Army’s lethality.

The retirement is one of several decisions reshaping the Army’s rotary fleet, since officials also said the plan would require some helicopter ambitions to be delayed and would bring a phased withdrawal of some older Chinooks as they reach maintenance milestones, even as the separately announced New Medium Helicopter programme continues.

The reasoning officials offered is that the available money is being concentrated on the capabilities judged to matter most against the threat, with crewed reconnaissance among the roles they consider better handled by autonomous systems, though the counter-consideration that has shadowed past helicopter decisions is that the uncrewed replacements really need to be in service and proven before the crewed aircraft are withdrawn, or else the Army risks a spell without the capability while the new systems are still maturing.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

17 COMMENTS

  1. Yet again the only thing written in stone in that statement is they are retiring the helicopters. Hopefully that is just the role and not the actual helicopters. They can surely use them elsewhere? The sticking point for me is they WILL invest in a replacement which WOULD take over the role. So definitely getting rid of the choppers with nothing yet to replace them. Based on past performance what could possibly go wrong with that?

    • Certainly they could be broken up for spares to sustain the Navy’s airframes. Or they might be sold, or gifted to Ukraine. Surely not scrapped given the amount of remaining life these must have.

    • It would make sense if some were retained for use in HADR operations, where basic recce (for damage assessment) and VERTREP to remote/ cut-off locations are useful.
      It might also be an idea if some were retained for use as planeguard on the carriers, as well as a boost to the numbers lent to the RM by the Army

    • Was wondering the same. I agree for recon they are obsolete in the drone era but could still have a lot of use at sea for air support roles for the marines or even limited sub hunting. Fairly new platform, it would be a shame not to make use if possible.

  2. Pretty certain the Wildcat is used for a plethora of other roles than just recce. Just sounds like yet more cuts, for the sake of eking out the budget!

    • Some are used for SF. NMH was going to replace the Dauphins, maybe SF will take a few Wildcats to get a standardised fleet and retire the Dauphin?

  3. Pretty soon anyone with 4hrs a day on Call if Duty will be ripe for a role in the armed forces. No other qualifications needed. Perhaps they already are?

    • Not quite sure what discussing aircraft being retired early has got to do with call of duty,but whatever floats your boat I suppose!

  4. It was just a point of so much unmaned kit coming in the place of manned kit that anyone who’s good in that sphere will be ripe for recruitment. Still, the MOD will save a bundle on wages/pensions.

  5. Why retire ?
    Why not repurpose/reassign?

    Yet again MOD retains habit of throwing away perfectly good kit

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here