BAE Systems announced this week in Kyiv that it has established a local legal entity in Ukraine and signed multiple agreements with the Ukrainian Government to enhance support for Ukraine’s armed forces.

The agreements also explore options for supplying light guns to Ukraine.

The company, which has previously supplied much of the equipment provided to Ukraine, is currently working with NATO countries to offer support, training, and repairs to Ukraine’s armed forces.

Signing the agreements and establishing a legal entity in Ukraine builds on our existing trust and support and paves the way for us to work together to provide more direct support to the Ukrainian armed forces,” said Charles Woodburn, Chief Executive of BAE Systems.

The first of the new agreements lays the groundwork for BAE Systems to collaborate with Armed Forces Ukraine (AFU) in understanding and supporting the country’s future military capabilities and to help revitalise Ukraine’s industrial base.

The second agreement creates a framework for BAE Systems to explore potential partners and the possibility of manufacturing 105mm Light Guns within Ukraine.

These developments come on the heels of Ukraine and Sweden’s recent intent to cooperate on the CV90 platform, which is manufactured by BAE Systems’ Hägglunds business in Sweden.

Oleksandr Kamyshin, Ukraine’s Minister for Strategic Industry, expressed gratitude toward the defence giant, stating, “I am grateful to BAE Systems for the bold decision to stand side by side with us in the fight against Russian aggression and building the future of the Ukrainian defence industry.

You can read more by clicking here.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

28 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Geoff Roach
Geoff Roach (@guest_750475)
8 months ago

Well done Bae.

farouk
farouk (@guest_750482)
8 months ago

Just as a bit of info, the bald fellow on the far left (Oleksil Reznikov) was removed as defence minister by Zelenskiy on Sunday after a a large number of corruption scandals surfaced inside the Ukrainian parliament especially inside their ministry of defence. He is touted as a future British ambassador.  

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins (@guest_750502)
8 months ago
Reply to  farouk

This makes for an interesting read!

List of political scandals in the United Kingdom
LINK

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_750515)
8 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Splendid 🙄

Matt
Matt (@guest_750549)
8 months ago
Reply to  farouk

AIUI he is not personally implicated in any scandals.

Reznikov’s failure has been in not rooting them all out firmly enough.

Interesting that his replacement is a Crimean Tartar.

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_750557)
8 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Mate as you are probably aware, Ukraine is also the land of corruption, oligarchs and organised crime! But, it does have the option, and requirement to clean up its act if it wants to eventually become part of the European “gang”! But, as at this time, they are doing a bloody good job of reducing Russias capacity to wage war, and doing NATOs job for them! War makes for strange bed fellows 👍

Matt
Matt (@guest_750568)
8 months ago
Reply to  Airborne

They seem to be making strides on corruption, too.

Telegraph podcast had some excellent coverage in the last day or two.

farouk
farouk (@guest_750664)
8 months ago
Reply to  Airborne

Airborne wrote:

“”Mate as you are probably aware, Ukraine is also the land of corruption, oligarchs and organised crime! “”

Still cleaner than the Uk, where liberal policing, even laxer courts sends the message that crime does pay.

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_750669)
8 months ago
Reply to  farouk

No argument from me mate!

Richard M
Richard M (@guest_750494)
8 months ago

Do people not wear suits and ties these days? This is an important agreement

BobA
BobA (@guest_750516)
8 months ago
Reply to  Richard M

One normally dresses equivalent to your client these days. If it was U.K. MOD they’d wear suit and tie.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_750558)
8 months ago
Reply to  Richard M

And they’re not even holding the documents up level…. Lol 😁

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_750602)
8 months ago
Reply to  Richard M

There is a war on you know.(Couldn’t resist the WW2/Dad’s Army cliche) Zelenski’s standard atire is an army green T-shirt.

Bob79
Bob79 (@guest_750511)
8 months ago

But off topic but Poland taking their defence seriously unlike our government
https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2023/09/05/poland-buys-hundreds-of-naval-strike-missiles-in-2-billion-deal/

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_750519)
8 months ago
Reply to  Bob79

Now some people will argue that Poland don’t have a Nuclear Deterrent ,and two big Aircraft carriers .Which is true however I agree with you I don’t think our PM and government take defence seriously and what we do have on our conventional forces are not fully equity like our carrier airwings,and that’s just for starters.Still it is what it is 👍 🍺

Gavin Gordon
Gavin Gordon (@guest_750553)
8 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

Mm, Nuclear Deterrent is the last Defence, of course. A foe could likely take a great deal of the piss before you’d consider triggering.
Not convinced we’d even have the carriers if Brown hadn’t initiated them. Nowadays, we still await a proportionate military component, and that remains a shared asset. Perhaps our current parliamentarians are too gentlemanly i.e. very reluctant to take Offence 😏

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins (@guest_750548)
8 months ago
Reply to  Bob79

I was talking about this on another thread recently in relation to UK Coastal Defence and the ability to support beachheads from attacks at home and abroad. “WARSAW, Poland — Poland has ordered “several hundred” Naval Strike Missiles in a deal worth 8 billion zloty (U.S. $2 billion), according to the country’s weapons procurement agency. MCSC is developing and fielding new anti-surface warfare weapons capabilities, including NMESIS, on pace to support Force Design 2030 objectives. These new capabilities contribute to the Fleet’s ability to achieve sea control, sea denial and defense against adversary amphibious force missions. “This exercise gave us… Read more »

Last edited 8 months ago by Nigel Collins
Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_750572)
8 months ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Think the UK needs to get its AD sorted like more sky sabre ,hard to believe we don’t really have 2nd to back up our Typhoons.For coastal defence it’s wishful thinking again 🤔

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins (@guest_750584)
8 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

Indeed! “Poland is beefing up its border defence capabilities in a clear warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Warsaw revealed on Tuesday (September 5) its plan to acquire six more batteries of the Patriot “hit to kill” missile defence system. Three out of four of the announced contracts are for such systems or their components with the first contract expected for the supply of elements of the Wisa system, with 48 M903 launchers, 644 PAC-3 MSE missiles and a total of 12 LTAMDS radars. The country’s Ministry of Defence confirmed the contracts are to be signed at the International Defence… Read more »

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_750623)
8 months ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Last I knew at the start of the Ukraine war our sky sabre platforms were sent to Poland to beef up there Air defence ,not sure how many but now I think Poland have more systems of there own in place ,is it not time for them to come back to the UK for our needs ? And maybe one could be quite useful in Cyprus ? 🍺

ABCRodney
ABCRodney (@guest_750643)
8 months ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

For the USMC to have this capability it makes perfect sense as they need to hold forward deployed bases on islands in the Pacific. As for us acquiring NSM for coastal defences I really think we have higher priorities such as a proper missile defence system based on ASTOR and CAMMS. If we needed it to defend UK home waters with coastal defence then something has gone seriously wrong. On the other hand it would be interesting to know if the NSM is compatible with the SAAB Giraffe radars used in the Sky Sabre System. My reason for that is… Read more »

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_750674)
8 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

Poland has just ordered 1000 CAAM-er missiles and 138 launchers.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_750559)
8 months ago
Reply to  Bob79

Maybe a bit of NATO stockpiling going on? How many ships are out there to hit?

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_750601)
8 months ago

That’s interesting. I thought the UK was fairly unique in still fielding 105mm atilliary as it was considered too light even decades ago. Hence 155mm being more the NATO standard. Shame we never got 155mm naval guns(Project was cancelled) so we could standardise our naval MG with army & Nato ammo. I do wish we’d pick a standard naval MG & stick to it, rather than choosing the BAE 5 inch (Good gun) but them selecting BAE 57mm for the T31.

ABCRodney
ABCRodney (@guest_750641)
8 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

Nope it’s in widespread use by dozens of operators including the US who have the L119 variant. They don’t have the range or power of a 155mm but are light, portable, accurate and pretty robust. Hence Ukraine is using as many as they can get hold of.
One thing I’ve never understood is why we don’t field the M777a ? After all it is a British design and we still build some of the parts for the US ones.

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_750678)
8 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

That’s always baffled me on M777 like you say British design still build parts and a very good weapon system 🤔

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_750740)
8 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

Most of our field artillery is of course 155mm and has been since FV433 Abbot was replaced by AS90 from 1992. Before then our artillery was 155mm (M109) or 8 inch (M110) or 175mm (M107).

It is only certain Light forces (Cdo, Para) that operate 105mm arty.