According to the latest Government Major Projects Portfolio (GMPP) data released by the Ministry of Defence (MOD), the Brimstone 3 project has encountered significant obstacles.

The project’s objective is to sustain the precise, low-collateral air-to-surface Brimstone capability on the Typhoon platform and integrate it onto the Protector platform.

As per the Senior Responsible Owner’s Delivery Confidence Assessment rating, the project has moved from an “Amber” status in Q4 of the 2021-2022 financial year to “Red” in Q4 of 2022-2023. “Compared to financial year 21/22-Q4, the Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 22/23-Q4 decreased from Amber (IPA rating) to Red (SRO rating).

The primary factors attributed to this shift are challenges in sourcing suitably qualified and experienced people across the programme and delivery teams, and within the industry.

There are challenges with resourcing sufficient suitably qualified and experienced people across the programme and delivery teams, and within industry. A series of deep-dives, along with a monthly Programme Board with the new Senior Responsible Owner have been put in place to address these challenges.

The project’s timeline remains steady, with an approved end date of 30th April 2029. Nevertheless, the project’s budget, forecast variance, and total baseline whole life costs have been exempted under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 due to “commercial interests”.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

38 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Brom
Brom (@guest_740995)
9 months ago

On a political and defence point. We should be identifying educational, defence or training requirements and offering a free ride through university for those that sign the contracts with us.

Investing in real skills and qualifications will never be a waste.

Jacko
Jacko (@guest_740998)
9 months ago
Reply to  Brom

Looking at Unis these days anybody that goes there will graduate with a VERY unhealthy attitude towards the military🙄

Stu
Stu (@guest_741018)
9 months ago
Reply to  Brom

100% agree there should be some incentive around courses we need people for both militarily and as a nation.
I found it interesting to look at ‘HESA’ stats for unis. Recommend looking it up. It’ll show numbers of students studying each subject. Look at social sciences and psychology versus STEM. Some guidance to our younger citizens needed I think.

Dave
Dave (@guest_741478)
9 months ago
Reply to  Brom

Why do you need a left leaning grad to do those jobs maybe an apprentice.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_740996)
9 months ago

Ah, a shortage of engineers and project managers?.., who’da thought! With the run down of manufacturing and the shift to low paid service ‘industries’ over the last 30 to 40 years it’s hardly surprising there is a shortage of trained, skilled and crucially experienced people.

As the war in Ukraine is reminding us large modern wars are fought as much in the engineering offices and on the factory floor as they are on the batllefield.

So much for the post industrial age..!

Politicians take note.

Cheers CR

Deep32
Deep32 (@guest_741006)
9 months ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

A broadly similar issue with the other thread ref Spear cap 3. Seems we aren’t turning out enough suitably qualified peoples days!
Its ok having lots of universities to help educate people, but offering the right sort of courses probably helps too….

Nath
Nath (@guest_741074)
9 months ago
Reply to  Deep32

I have an MSC in Electrical Engineering. On that programme of about 20 to 30 there were two Brits, the rest were Chinese and Indian and a smattering of others from other nations. I don’t blame people for taking other routes. I’m not recommending engineering to my children. There’s little corporate incentive to be an engineer, career development is limited with opportunities reserved typically for people and money management. Back at uni, you have a harder time of it, rack up the same debts and after all this there little respect for STEM in society. I bet the new Labour,… Read more »

Deep32
Deep32 (@guest_741078)
9 months ago
Reply to  Nath

Yes, that is a massive own goal is it not? In the quest for universities to make more money, they have opened up courses to chase foreign students (whom they can charge more). Somewhere down the line this is/has had a detrimental effect of home grown talent getting on a course. The other side is as you say in your post ref being STEM in society, hugely undervalued. I have to wonder what exactly ‘boy wonder’ is bringing to the House with his vast 25 years of knowledge/experience. Not that I’m against anyone having the right to become an MP,… Read more »

grizzler
grizzler (@guest_741115)
9 months ago
Reply to  Deep32

It was obvious that was going to happen once the uni’s had the go ahead to charge for courses , had their grants reduced and had to become self sufficient & allowed to charge more for foreign strudents to attend the course.
I bet many of those bemoaning the lack of British STEM students were exactly the same people who moaned when uni students didn have to pay for their course and called students idle sponging basterds.
Those who state “leaving school at 15 never did me any harm ” etc etc.- short sighted tossers all .

Sinbo
Sinbo (@guest_741255)
9 months ago
Reply to  Nath

Totally agree all excuses to save money and overcharge our gov due too poorly handled negotiations. I’ve a B.sc(Hons) 24 years safety critical experience software engineering, also hardware, ex military and security cleared. I can’t even get interviews at most of these places. Utter twaddle excuses.

mugofjava
mugofjava (@guest_742231)
9 months ago
Reply to  Sinbo

This echoes my experience of applying for jobs as an experienced engineer in the UK. Salaries are low relative to Europe and, despite apparent shortages, interviews are hard to come by.

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_742155)
9 months ago
Reply to  Nath

And as the Parliamentry commitee recently infered, the UK is shot through with unfiltered PRC influence & investment, so many of those Chinese could take our expertise back to improve their threat levels against us & our allies. One guy at the end of his PhD downloaded the entire science(or was it physics?) database at his Uni to take back to the PRC with him.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_741134)
9 months ago
Reply to  Deep32

Hi Deep32,

Certainly education is an issue, but I agree with what many others are saying about society’s attitude towards STEM careers / professionals and this is reflected in industry’s career and reward structures.

It is not helped by the boards’ focus on maximising profit – see what happened to Boeing when they switched from a focus on quality, safety and engineering to time and cost with non qualified managers forcing through engineering decisions…

Cheers CR

Mark Forsyth
Mark Forsyth (@guest_741082)
9 months ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Well said. We noticed the start of the decline when we first worked together 20 years ago. It will take a dedicated push to reverse the trend, which sadly I don’t think will be happening in the near term.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_741126)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mark Forsyth

Hi Mark, hope you are well. As a few of the posters above have stated there are serious issues with our university structure and how they are able to charge overseas students. On the plus side some engineering companies are bringing in apprenticeships with some of them leading to degree level qualifications. Whether it is enough to reverse the trend..? Well that is billions of pounds question… The trouble is industry won’t pay engineers what they are worth, won’t ensure a senble and rewarding career path and all too often preferring to bring in contractors which means no team development.… Read more »

Jim
Jim (@guest_741004)
9 months ago

No really an issue considering the current Brimstone missile in service is best in class.

A year or two will make little difference.

Jonno
Jonno (@guest_741019)
9 months ago
Reply to  Jim

Surely its being killed off because Lockheed wont give it space on F35?

James
James (@guest_741030)
9 months ago
Reply to  Jonno

Typhoon arent going anywhere anytime soon plus the requirement to integrate into the drones will see it have a long life.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_741052)
9 months ago
Reply to  Jonno

Lockheed F35 is only going to be the best aircraft out there until 2035-, after then they will have to be more flexible and quick.
With KF21, tempest, ghost bat, drones and so on coming online customers won’t put up with huge lengthy issues.
I hope the new aircraft, drones can be a lot more flexible, speedy to integrate stuff onto, update etc. If the operating and maintenance requirements and costs can be brought down also it makes them a game changer.

Deep32
Deep32 (@guest_741077)
9 months ago
Reply to  Jonno

Brimstone isnt slated to be fitted to our F35 fleet, its only for Typhoon. Spear 3 on the other hand is slated for F35. Its all delays it seems, whether due to us or Lockheed.

McMeekin Ian
McMeekin Ian (@guest_741262)
9 months ago
Reply to  Jonno

US pushing JAGM – since we picked it for Apache. Offering cheap price and pushing commonality and interoperability on F35.
They are doing the same with AIM260 they want Meteor MLU cancelled and will manage this by integrating US weapons soon and pushing UK weapons back in to the 2030’s.
This should really come as no surprise to anyone

Rudeboy
Rudeboy (@guest_741307)
9 months ago
Reply to  McMeekin Ian

JAGM and Brimstone are not on F-35…

What Meteor MLU are you talking about?

Baddlesmere
Baddlesmere (@guest_741933)
9 months ago
Reply to  Rudeboy

The USMC intend fitting JAGM to F35C “Farther into the future, the USMC wants to equip its AV-8B and F-35B fighters with JAGM Increment 3. Note, however, that there’s no set schedule for missile upgrades. On the export front, if JAGM is added to F-35Bs, it will be competing with the MBDA Brimstone and SPEAR missiles that Britain plans to integrate into its own F-35B fleet” Also check this link for USMC plan – USMC. It would not be in the US’s commercial interests to allow an ‘alien’ weapon to be integrated to F35 without the US having a competitive… Read more »

Rudeboy
Rudeboy (@guest_742272)
9 months ago
Reply to  Baddlesmere

JAGM has repeatedly been mentioned for Fast Air employment, but the US has resolutely not funded integration.

There are no plans at present to put JAGM on F-35. Brimstone’s integration effort was cancelled by the UK a decade ago as the Spear 3 programme started up.

So neither Brimstone or JAGM will ‘win’…

The real competition is MBDA Spear and SDBII…which the US is winning, for the simple reason they have a working missile…

DRS
DRS (@guest_742005)
9 months ago
Reply to  McMeekin Ian

Yes we need to push brimstone and Spear 3 to Apache and also on Navy eg Wildcat we should push to be on as many platforms as we can. Then you have scale to reduce overall production cost and also can sell to others that have these platforms. Else USA will slowly kill off our industry.

Farouk
Farouk (@guest_741020)
9 months ago
ABCRodney
ABCRodney (@guest_741046)
9 months ago
Reply to  Farouk

Ta

Cel
Cel (@guest_741039)
9 months ago

Meanwhile, our PM said to our youngsters aiming to go to the university to
“THINK SMALL”…

Last edited 9 months ago by Cel
Geoff Roach
Geoff Roach (@guest_741076)
9 months ago

Here we go again. ISD remains, they say. How many times have we heard that? Oh, and we couldn’t possibly let anybody know what the costs are. Amazing. So everything is normal in the world of UK procurement.😡

Rob Young
Rob Young (@guest_741084)
9 months ago

Previous defence cuts and erratic ordering has made it very difficult to maintain the experienced and trained staff needed – we really need to start planning for the long term and train and retain a workforce in sufficient numbers. Not going to happen of course.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_741094)
9 months ago

Consequences of Jornalism.

Peter S
Peter S (@guest_741164)
9 months ago

Brimstone 3 first test firing was in March 2019 and was reported as entirely successful by MBDA. So presumably the problems/delays are in integration on to platforms. In contrast, it seems that Sea Venom development has problems with the missile itself.

Rudeboy
Rudeboy (@guest_741334)
9 months ago
Reply to  Peter S

That was Brimstone 3A, Brimstone 3B completed test firings in 2021 as well.

It’s the only production version now.

Dave34
Dave34 (@guest_741573)
9 months ago

Same issue around SQEP is likley to affect the GCAP programme

Last edited 9 months ago by Dave34
Oliver Craig
Oliver Craig (@guest_741619)
9 months ago

How can we have engineers when so many people work from home pushing figures and words about on a computer. At 76 I am retired now but worked at engineering from a 16 year old apprentice till retirement. Although you served a 5 year apprenticeship and gained some paper qualifications you were always treated as a second class employee. A little girl junior in the office was treated better so mo wonder there is a dearth of engineers.

Jay
Jay (@guest_742088)
9 months ago

Okay cool. Now what does “moving into red” actually mean?

Last edited 9 months ago by Jay
Ben
Ben (@guest_742098)
9 months ago

Start advertising salaries higher than middle management, in the 100Ks, for engineers who are currently paid average 50-60K, and you’ll get the staff you want.
Nobody wants to touch defence work because of the security hoops to jump through, high pressure, middling salaries and potential moral grounds of (offensive) weaponry being used by the PM du jour choosing to ignore (lack of) WMD advice.
Why do that work when for the same pay other companies offer the same or better pay, less hours, and potentially more fun work?
Source: Me and other engineer mates.

mugofjava
mugofjava (@guest_742232)
9 months ago
Reply to  Ben

Spot on. You have this right on the nose.