British F-35 jets have landed in Estonia as they prepare to undertake air patrols over Eastern Europe to deter Russia from taking any aggressive actions against NATO members.
According to a statement from NATO here:
“The F-35 Lightnings from RAF Marham, UK joined other Allied 5th Generation fighters provided by the US Air Force and the Royal Netherlands Air Force who are taking part in air patrols over Eastern Europe. This activity provides air policing of NATO airspace ensuring a robust and integrated shield for Allied airspace and contributing to the security of Europe.
This new deployment will see the aircraft based alongside Belgian F-16s where they will be better postured to support the ongoing NATO mission. They will join other Allied 4th and 5th Generation fighters carrying out patrols over Polish and the Baltic States’ airspace.”
Group Captain Philip Marr, Station Commander, RAF Marham, was quoted as saying:
“The F-35 is an incredibly capable and versatile aircraft. Operating alongside the Typhoons they are maintaining the integrity of the European airspace and contributing to the NATO Mission,” said Group Captain Philip Marr, Station Commander, RAF Marham. “The 5th Generation Fighter is a world beating aircraft which can simultaneously provide Information Warfare, Intelligence gathering and Air-to-Air missions.”
Earlier I reported that British F-35Bs were also joining British Typhoon jets in an effort to reinforce NATO air policing efforts in Eastern Europe.
British F-35 stealth jets deploy in effort to reinforce Europe
The Royal Air Force say here that the Lightnings from RAF Marham also joined the Typhoon jets taking part in pre-planned Enhanced Vigilance Activity, “a NATO led Operation initiated due to the unfolding events in Ukraine. This activity provides air policing of NATO airspace ensuring a robust response to the Russian aggression seen in Ukraine and further contributing to the security of Europe”.
Considering we have 24 in the UK what do you reckon? Total of 4 for this deployment?
Four would be the absolute minimum, depending on the length of the deployment there may be 8.
You know the Netherlands only deployed two I believe.
In April and May unless that has changed?
https://english.defensie.nl/latest/news/2022/01/26/netherlands-provides-f-35s-and-land-based-units-for-nato-defence
I’snt it rather odd that they never seem to mention the actual numbers being deployed?
Not really, as things stand why do a potential enemies intel gathering for them?
We have announced the amount of Typhoons after all and Holland announced 2 F35
Spot on
We mentioned the additional Typhoon numbers so why not the F-35? It would send a very clear message to the Russians surely.
“Four additional UK Typhoon jets have landed at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus as part of efforts to deter Russia as tensions mount.”
https://www.forces.net/news/britain-deploys-more-fighter-jets-cyprus-amid-russia-tensions
I am sure not knowing how many F35s we sent would concern Russia more then knowing exactly. The F35 is a more sophisticated asset then Typhoon and capable of stealthy strike missions… more of a threat to Russia. The fact is we the public do not need to know how many were sent and the Russians by extension do not need to know.
“The F35 is a more sophisticated asset then Typhoon and capable of stealthy strike missions…”
No longer the case, fortunately.
Digital Means Adaptable
“Importantly, the Typhoon’s advanced, reprogrammable EW suite allows the aircraft to react to a constantly-changing threat environment in ways that physical stealth cannot.
Consider today’s threats. The latest surface-to-air missile systems are having their hardware regularly upgraded, are being networked and can change their behaviour almost instantaneously via software reprogramming.
In short, they are constantly evolving, creating a dynamic and challenging threat environment.
This means that the advantage of aircraft which use traditional physical stealth technology, which is designed to make the aircraft hard-to-observe by threat radar systems, is eroding. Counter-stealth techniques are on the rise and have been successfully employed as far back as 1993.
“These threat systems are being updated more regularly and are frequently networked, allowing them to share intelligence of the air situation.
EW systems are able to evolve to deal with this dynamic and rapidly changing threat, in a way that fifth-generation stealthy aircraft cannot. While stealth aircraft are hard to detect, they are not invisible, and counter-stealth technology is developing rapidly.
Moreover, the skin, internal structure, and configuration of an aircraft cannot be easily altered. “You cannot easily modify a stealth platform to counter new high-end threats,” Hewer said.”
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2019-06-19/typhoons-digital-stealth-can-evolve-meet-changing-threat
There is no comparison , F-35 is in another category altogether . Typhoon is an public works program pushing out antiquated irrelevant decoy targets that are too expensive and you would be better off with some cheap Loyal wing man craft .
“There is no comparison, F-35 is in another category altogether”
Correct, It will be of little use to us until the delivery of Block 4 software which is now scheduled for delivery in 2029 hence the reason the US is looking for a new 4.5 gen aircraft.
The Russians know how few we have just like we do; I don’t think this will bother them too much.
There again, they’ve made a royal pig’s ear of their air campaign thus far so maybe they will sit up and take notice!
Any 5th gen platforms will worry them as Ukraine has actually showed to the world that the modern Russkie mil is just as shite as the Cold War 80s lot! Most of their “new” and modern assets don’t seem to be what they claim!
Yes you only need a few 5th generation platforms to provider sensor synergy and information sharing nodes for all your 4+ plus aircraft to destroy an all 4th generation airforce before it really has the situational awareness to fight back.
In fairness the 80’s lot were probably better.
They are using mostly 80’s kit and are wondering why when they have an iPhone in their pocket……
Agreed 👍!
Good. Just good.
On a side note, i see that the French have withdrawn their engineers from the European 6th Generation fighter jet project n a row over work share. Geez, no-one saw that coming 😆
Hi Jack – shades of the original Eurofighter in the 1980s all over again!
And Concord(E)?
nice one SB!
What the French wanted most of the work load and manufacturing, that must be a huge departure for usual French negotiations.
Time to invite the Germans into Tempest ! cash to spend……..sorry…dont know what came over me.
No. The Germans join programmes wait until the design is ready to enter production then dont order the numbers they promised. Result= unit price increased for other partners. Keep Germany out of Tempest. We can sell them some as long as made in UK when the programme reaches fruition.
German defence is a mess. They are having to spend massively just to catch up.
My comment was a feeble attempt at humour but the behaviours you list sound very much like the UK MOD over the past 20 years. Eurofighter, F35 , T45, T26, a400, Wildcat… At this stage a contribution to development costs is a contribution to development costs. If we work on premis that UK wants to proceed then any German need for XX volume of units would still be XX units above what otherwise would have been ordered. A contribution to scale.
Agreed!
Thats hillarious. The French will screw the Germans over. Take the technology out of the programme and design their own new Rafale2 to sell internationally.
They have form for doing this.
What is so frustrating is that NATO as such an advantage it could stop the Russian armed forces in there tracks and allow Ukraine to remove the invader.
In really the is not about NATO not wanting to help or not being able to simply stop Russia in its track. NATO could and everyone would support it as justified. It would also re instate western geopolitical loss of influence and make China a lot more considered in any future aggression.
But this is not about NATO conventional power it’s all about Nuclear Weapons and a conflict between nuclear powers. It’s about resolve and the west is just not ready for this. It’s a long time since the Soviet Union knew in its bones that NATO would end it all if pushed. We somehow need to return to that shared undertaking or Putin will continue to push, make a mistake and force a conflict.
From a NATO point of view the problem is Putin has played the Nuclear blackmail card and at present it seems like it worked….that’s a problem.
I think the issue at the beginning was that NATO didn’t really believe just how useless Russian forces were.
After long drawn out wars in Sandy places belief in shock and awe had evaporated.
If the reality of the whole thing being totally blow in 12 hours or less had sunk in then a more aggressive approach might well have followed.
The loss of Russian conscript kids would have been colossal and terrible.
you may be right that the western decision makers just did not figure the qualitative difference in western military compared to Russia. We maybe need more faith in our own power and ability. After all the west was shocked just how behind Soviet hardware was compared to the Western forces in the early 1990s, Our own equipment has improved significantly since then T45 vs T42. Our SNN fleet of trafalgars were better than anything the Soviets but in the water and the Astutes are a step change above the trafalgars, all the Russian boats are either Cold War relics 30-40 years old, even for the new subs started as Cold War programmes. It’s the same with the airforce.
Our error was lack of confidence and political will in the last five years which seems to have been causes by to much confidence in 1990-2015, ( the whole end of history shit) which lead us to almost loss our military edge and which has drained down to public will to fight. It’s probably becuase we have not had a western leader who’s been able properly handle an aggressive totalitarian leader of a pear state since Reagan and Thacher…That’s what has allowed Putin to do this and use Nuclear blackmail to keep NATO in the back foot. We need to somehow get the initiative, without tipping the possible mental case into nuclear war as well as somehow allow Ukraine to survive as well as stop all the civilian casualties….Shit hard times.
I do feel for the Russian conscripts, as I would imagine most would want to be anywhere else and are powerless to change their position ( I may be wrong, but I would imaging desertion would potentially be a capital crime in the Russian military) but I still feel a lot more for the Ukrainian civilians and military. In the end it’s always normal people who ( be they solders or civilians) who suffer for the decisions of the powerful, at lest in the west the powerful are moderated by elections and so take care to not risk lives without significant cause.
Is the UK deploying F-35s to Estonia and on-board HMS Prince of Wales at the same time?
No. There are no fixed wing aircraft on any UK aircraft carrier at the moment.