Throughout August, P-8 Poseidon aircraft have been conducting maritime surveillance missions in collaboration with the Royal Navy.

These efforts focused on monitoring Russian vessels in the North Sea and North Atlantic, contributing to the ongoing role of protecting UK waters.

The aircraft flew continuous sorties, operating “24 hours a day for multiple days,” according to the press release. This high level of activity was made possible by support personnel at RAF Lossiemouth, who are part of Team Lossie.

The aircraft worked in close coordination with HMS Portland, allowing for continuous monitoring from both sea and air.

During these operations, Poseidons tracked and photographed a range of Russian naval vessels. Among these were Corvettes Boikiy and Grad, Cruiser Marshal Ustinov, and the Udaloy-class Destroyer Severomorsk. Some of these vessels were part of the Russian Navy Day celebrations held in St. Petersburg on July 30th, while others had joined from the High North.

Wing Commander Livesey, Officer Commanding 120 Squadron, expressed pride in the team’s efforts, stating, “The deterrence we have enabled in recent days is important to the UK and NATO, with this a key reason for why Poseidon hold operational readiness 365 days a year.”

The Poseidon’s are multi-role maritime reconnaissance aircraft equipped with advanced sensors, including acoustic tracking. For this function, sonobuoys are dropped from the aircraft, creating a network of sensors that relay data back.

In addition to the P-8 Poseidon missions, RAF Typhoon aircraft were launched to intercept Russian aircraft believed to be operating in conjunction with the Russian Navy vessels.

You can read more by clicking here. Episode 3 of the Channel 4 documentary ‘Top Guns: Inside the RAF,’ airing on 4th September, will provide a behind-the-scenes look at the P8 Poseidon squadrons.

Tom has spent the last 13 years working in the defence industry, specifically military and commercial shipbuilding. His work has taken him around Europe and the Far East, he is currently based in Scotland.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

48 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brom
Brom
7 months ago

Insert “we need more of these” comment here

Because we really do

Marked
Marked
7 months ago
Reply to  Brom

And insert comment “we need the capability to do more than watch”

Because we really do.

Frank62
Frank62
7 months ago
Reply to  Brom

Agreed. More weponry too. We need an AShM carried. They can shadow & moniter enemy ships beyond SAM range &, if ever needed, eliminate them too.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

P-8 is integrated with Harpoon Block1C , which is supposed to be the version UK has

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

As I post every time this comes up – it was announced that there was a common stockpile of weapons for the P8 which is on a pay when used basis.

But that is only an official announcement. Speculation, ignoring that, is so much more useful!

Duker
Duker
6 months ago

I checked and the Block 1C was the existing UK harpoon stocks. Its being phased out for the ship launched but doesnt mean it still still cant be used for P-8, unless they are being adapted for the NSM too

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
6 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Common stockpile…..

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
7 months ago

lots of wear and tear on the airframes- we need to distribute this workload by having more airframes. Quantity has a quality in its own rights.
Another 5-6 aircraft are needed and whilst we are at it fit JSAAMER or LRASM.

Marked
Marked
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

For work like this where all that is being done is monitoring, no heavy weapons load required, surely the best option is a drone not a huge complex expensive manned aircraft.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
7 months ago
Reply to  Marked

I wonder whether the Protectors will play a role here?

Marked
Marked
7 months ago

I would hope so. Using an aircraft like the Poseidon to just watch them seems excessively costly, it’s also not an effective use of a scarce anti sub platform.

Mark Franks
Mark Franks
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Whilst I agree we need more, wear and tear is not an issue. It is a converted 737 designed to spend more time in the air than on the ground.

jjsmallpiece
jjsmallpiece
7 months ago
Reply to  Mark Franks

Disagree, wear and tear is an issue. Not designed to spend a large proportion of its time at relatively low level, which passenger 737s don’t. So more corrosion is likely due to the maritime air at low level, greater mechanical stress/fatigue expenditure at low level.

Mark franks
Mark franks
7 months ago
Reply to  jjsmallpiece

The p8s taxi through a daily wash on return. There is no change on airframe hours or fatigue life as to thier civilian counterparts.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mark franks

Yes. The RAF may do 800 hrs per year , while an airline would do that in 6 weeks and more at low level because of the takeoffs and landings are far greater. 5000 ft is low enough and not too hard on airframe

jjsmallpiece
jjsmallpiece
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Was it the old Valiants that quickly failed, contributed to by a change from high level to low level operations, hence greater fatigue loading.
We’ll see with the B737s, I guess.
Have you done an SN curve calculation?

Last edited 7 months ago by jjsmallpiece
Duker
Duker
6 months ago
Reply to  jjsmallpiece

That would be a different sort of low level- high speed at under 500 ft
The P-8 is going to be lower speed at 5000ft with occasions a bit lower.
Like I said all the commercial airliners landings at lower levels after 1 -2 hr flights isnt how the P-8 would operate so they gain there.
Im sure they have looked at how a plane designed for high number of hours and high numbers of cycles will be Ok for a different spectrum over 25 years

jjsmallpiece
jjsmallpiece
7 months ago
Reply to  Mark franks

Thats doesn’t stop internal corrosion, where the spray doesn’t get to.

Mark franks
Mark franks
7 months ago
Reply to  jjsmallpiece

P8s like the Nimrod have anti corrosion applied. Believe me if after a week of ops over the ocean you would know about it if they didn’t.

farouk
farouk
7 months ago

Maybe Twitter should fact check Greg Shapps:
https://i.postimg.cc/Qdznzc8g/Opera-Snapshot-2023-09-03-115715-www-mailplus-co-uk.png
‘Though I might be new to defence, defence is in the DNA’, We are upping our game. Next year, we will spend more than £50 billion on defence for the first-time in our history. And we have the largest defence budget in Europe. In fact, this Government has committed to increase spending over the longer-term to 2.5 per cent of GDP as we improve our fiscal position and grow our economy.’

Last edited 7 months ago by farouk
Andrew D
Andrew D
7 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Own really 😀

Mark Franks
Mark Franks
7 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Anything to show for it?

Frank62
Frank62
7 months ago
Reply to  farouk

That all means nothing at all until we see forces actually increasing again after decades of decline.

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  farouk

“This government has committed to increase spending over the longer-term to 2.5 per cent of GDP as we improve our fiscal position and grow our economy.’”

I love the way they can use such an affirmative and decisive word ‘committed’ and follow it up with

‘At some undetermined future point’, without any specifics of absolutely anything whatsoever!

Such utter, utter, horse shit, typical political verbal diarrhoea…..

Paul.P
Paul.P
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

It’s a skill…..you can’t see his lips move 🙂

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

How true mate …. I hate politicians I really do….

Jonathan
Jonathan
7 months ago
Reply to  farouk

They always use the “we are spending more than ever before BS…….it’s called inflation everything this more expensive every year….your not investing more if your only keeping up with inflation in that sector…….

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

How true, it’s a bloody mess…. I still can’t see how they intend to fund the new SSN’s, GCAP and all the various re-equipment plans underway on the current budget, that’s in the red! Tempest/GCAP alone is going to take 15 billion, with the bulk spent in the first 8 years…. The money simply isn’t there, I certainly wouldn’t want to be the next governments defence secretary, SDSR 2025 is going be like trying to hammer a square peg into a bloody round hole! I suspect the Tories are setting Labour up for a massive fall with defence, so they… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

I’d read 10 billion is already allocated from the 10 year equipment budget for Tempest.

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago

That’s interesting mate, I thought it was only 2 billion allocated to 2025, for initial development.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

The exact budget allocation and how it works is not my strong point. All I know is what I’d read on UKAFC when he was looking through the latest 10 year plan.

Serious money.

Paul.P
Paul.P
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

It’s not just defence. School buildings and other public buildings need a massive building program. Ditto housing. I’m investing in post war prefabs! Generation and the electricity grid needs to increase x2 or 3 to support electrification of heating and transport. The NHS needs taking apart and re- assembling to a new model. The infrastructure of the country needs renovation, starting with the Act of Settlement, the Union and the devolution legislation. Money will have to come from the pension schemes + Liverpool can chip in when they sell Mo Salah to Saudi Al-Ittihad..£200m….isn’t that £40m in VAT?

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Very true, I honestly think the next government will be in a financial straight jacket for the entire Parliament.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

Like having to do austerity because of the previous incumbents where profligate rampant spenders… Nahhh…that will never catch on…

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

That’s true mate, if Labour get in, it’s going to be a very unstable time.

One side of the party and all the unions will be absolutely screaming for social spending increases right accross the board and public sector pay rises….

I would expect a lot of in fighting and a whole series of fresh strikes…

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
7 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Cant Mo claim the VAT back at the airport with the correct forms…😏

Paul.P
Paul.P
7 months ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

I’m sure they are working on it 😉

Roy
Roy
7 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

What matters most in the politics of most western countries is the appearance of doing something. Whether you actually do anything is quite beside the point.

I can say that in Canada, we have become experts at talking an awful lot, but doing as little as possible.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago
Reply to  Roy

Perhaps Canada could do the U.K. a favour and take the immigrants. It has lots of space and for its size has a small population. It could increase there tax take which in turn could fund its government more. The Rwanda of the north. Sorted😂😂😂😂

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Canada is already taking 500,000 new migrants per year- 20% of their population is ‘permanent residency’ only

Mark Franks
Mark Franks
7 months ago

No different to the days of the Kipper fleet and we had many more. Always on patrol including holding dinghy and nuclear watch.

Chris Webb
Chris Webb
7 months ago

It’s well known that Russian aircraft are typically tracked by the RNoAF who hand them over to the RAF, then the French etc. Are ships tracked in the same way?

Paul T
Paul T
7 months ago
Reply to  Chris Webb

Ships and Submarines to a lesser extent can be tracked in and out of Port yes.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago

An astute boat left faslane today or yesterday. I wonder where it’s going and what boat it was. In fact I don’t want to know.

Dern
Dern
7 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

HMS McSinky boat off to sink the Russians in the channel if the comments section is being listened too XD

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago
Reply to  Dern

I await the return with a jolly Rodger flying with 3 Russian ships and 10 dingys painted on it.
Some folks would be delighted.
Until 15 mins later when an ICBM blows them to pieces 🙈

Dern
Dern
7 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Yes! Spearfish are perfect for halting migrants. Anyone know what those go for these days? Has to be for less than a migrant dinghy!
While were at it lets invade France and occupy the beaches, because why start 1 Nuclear War when we can start 2!?

Andrew
Andrew
7 months ago
Reply to  Dern

HMS McSinky….. now was that the top secret final Swiftsure class SSN no one knows about or is part of the new Mc/Mac class?