Tanker RFA Tideforce rendezvoused with Canadian and Portuguese warships in the narrows between Denmark and the Scandinavian peninsula to support ongoing NATO operations.

HMCS Toronto and NRP Corte Real are attached to the alliance’s Standing Maritime Group 1, which patrols the waters of northern Europe from the Baltic to Atlantic carrying out collective training and championing NATO’s work and peacekeeping mission.

According to the Royal Navy in a statement:

“Fresh from working with HMS Mersey in these same waters, the NATO duo stationed astern of the 39,000-tonne Royal Fleet Auxiliary in near-perfect conditions in the Skagerrak to take on their black gold from Tideforce’s cavernous tanks. The tanker called the warships forward and then conducted the replenishment at sea largely by visual signaling such as flags and Morse code by lamp as the sun descended.”

“It was a privilege for RFA Tideforce to be able to support Maritime Group 1,” said Captain Simon Herbert, the tanker’s commanding officer.

“Both ships were able to benefit from our state-of-the-art replenishment at sea capabilities and remain on their tasking conducting NATO missions as part of the NATO Maritime Response Force. The replenishments clearly highlighted the integrated and flexible capability of the newest of the RFA Tide-class tankers.”

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cam
Cam
1 month ago

These tankers were a bargain. You couldn’t even buy 1 type 26 frigate for the cost of 4 of the tide tankers! 550 million for 4, but then fitting out With the electronics ect in the UK bumped that up a bit.

michael
michael
1 month ago
Reply to  Cam

Not to mention the faulty wiring and firefighting system that all had to be fixed. No wonder the MOD have twice refused to release details of this contract even after two requests under the FOI act.

Paul42
Paul42
1 month ago
Reply to  michael

Things had to be fixed, as is always the case no matter what you are building. But at the end of the day these ships were bargains.

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Paul42

Doesn’t sound like a bargain to me, considering a commercial oil rig would cost in the millions not hundreds. Ok these are a little more complex as they can refuse at sea, but hundreds of million more seems unlikely as they are not build to warship spec.

Darren
Darren
1 month ago
Reply to  Cam

550 million quid with no tax back means between 800 to 900 million quid plus the UK protected bit means around one billion pounds. The worst deal in UK history and you kill your own industry potential for it. Mugs!

Joe16
Joe16
1 month ago
Reply to  Darren

I think £550M with no tax back is still £550M, if I’m not mistaken…? Unless you mean any taxes we may have been obliged to pay getting them from Korea to here, but I’d expect that to be covered within the contract price- it normally is. Even if you’re right and it was £1B for 4 vessels, that’s £250M a pop for critical connectors and enablers that set us apart from most navies in NATO when it comes to the real unsung hero of logistics. I don’t think that’s at all bad. Where you and I both agree: They should… Read more »

David
David
1 month ago
Reply to  Joe16

USNS John Lewis: a little larger, but the contract sum is $649 million for one ship. On that basis, the Tide class were definitely a bargain………

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
1 month ago
Reply to  David

Never knowingly under sold ! 😊

Herodotus
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

Lovely 🙂

Fedaykin
Fedaykin
1 month ago
Reply to  Darren

Point me towards the UK yard that could have delivered four tankers at the price and within the time-frame that the MOD had specified. People here forget that no UK yard bid for this contract. The UK lost it’s world leading ship building industry decades ago due to a host of issues. The failure to consolidate leading to a large number of yards competing against each other. The majority of yards being in estuary rivers seriously hampering the efficiency of production. Failure to modernise after WWII exacerbated by a glut of surplus war built commercial shipping. Yard owners who saw… Read more »

Darren
Darren
1 month ago
Reply to  Fedaykin

No UK yard bid for the contract because they were not welcome.

Fedaykin
Fedaykin
1 month ago
Reply to  Darren

Utter nonsense Darren! What do you mean ‘Not Welcome’?

No UK yard bid because they were already busy with work for the QE class and the delivery schedule and price point expected by the MOD for the project was not achievable or profitable.

Jason Holmes
Jason Holmes
1 month ago

Great looking vessels

Darren
Darren
1 month ago

Like to see these commercial ships doing a little bit more commercial shipping.

David
David
1 month ago
Reply to  Darren

They would be hopelessly uneconomic as commercial tankers: relatively small oil capacity with large engines designed for a top speed of some 26 knots.

Dern
Dern
1 month ago
Reply to  David

I was going to say… they’re not really “commerical ships.”

Fedaykin
Fedaykin
1 month ago
Reply to  Darren

No shipping firm that operates Tankers would buy a UK built tanker, it would be commercially insane! No UK yard has a hope of building one at a price point that the industry would be prepared to accept!

No if I was a shipping operator I would be placing my order in Vietnam like every other company in that sector is at the moment!

http://sbic.com.vn/default.aspx/?lang=2

TopBoy
TopBoy
1 month ago

I’m obviously pro Royal Navy and pro British ship building but these where a bargain! Great looking boats too!