A defence company in West Sussex developing counter-drone and air defence technology has been left on hold since last year awaiting clarity on the UK Defence Investment Plan, a Liberal Democrat MP told the House of Commons during Treasury questions on 28 April.

John Milne, MP for Horsham, raised the case of Chess Dynamics, part of the Cohort group, which he described as a world-leading developer of exactly the capabilities the armed forces need. Without clarity from the DIP, Milne said the company cannot commission new air defence systems, leaving the next generation of Royal Navy frigates potentially exposed. “It needs to know now,” he said, asking the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to meet him and Chess Dynamics to provide the certainty the company required.

Chief Secretary James Murray defended the government’s record on defence investment, pointing to over a thousand contracts signed since the general election including a billion-pound contract for medium helicopters in Yeovil, half a billion pounds invested in radar systems, and £100 million to support submarine-hunting aircraft. “This Government are raising investment in defence to the highest sustained level since the cold war and it is at the core of ensuring that we are protecting our nation’s security,” he said, without directly addressing the DIP delay or agreeing to the requested meeting.

The exchange reflects a pattern of concern emerging across the UK defence industry over the delayed Defence Investment Plan, which is intended to set out the MoD’s funding priorities and programme commitments for the coming years. The plan’s finalisation has been cited in recent parliamentary correspondence as a blocking factor for a number of capability and infrastructure decisions. The collapse of Aeralis, the modular jet aircraft developer that had positioned itself as a potential Red Arrows replacement, was directly attributed by its administrators to cashflow pressure caused by continued delays to the DIP.

Conservative shadow minister James Wild pressed Murray on whether the Chancellor was blocking the investment plan, citing former Defence Secretary and NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson’s warning that “we cannot defend Britain with an ever-expanding welfare budget.” Murray dismissed the challenge, pointing to the previous government’s welfare spending record and reaffirming the commitment to raise defence spending to 2.6% of GDP by next April.

Dame Meg Hillier, Chair of the Treasury Committee, also asked whether the government would consider joining the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank to accelerate defence investment. Murray noted the UK had already signed up alongside Finland and the Netherlands to a multilateral defence budget.

8 COMMENTS

    • Why can’t the PM just get DIP v.1 out nowish and a finalised one later? Ridiculous behaviour isn’t it? We all want to see their homework and give them a mark….LOL.

      • What you’re advocating is an aspiration list which is exactly what the last government did and it was a disaster. That’s why defence is in such a state now. Defence should not be an aspiration.

        I agree the DIP should have been produced last year and there is no excuse for the delay but having a fully funded ten year equipment plan should be a basic standard. Unfortunately the last government didn’t do this and started building up aspirations that were in effect vital military equipment.

  1. Isn’t it time the the “highest sustained investment since the Cold War” rhetoric was changed? There is no increased investment in conventional military capability. Nor have we even returned the twisted headline measure to where the old and better-measured headline number was in 2010. Yet.

    • Can you share your numbers on that as you math doesn’t seem to fit with the numbers I have seen.

      why are you making a distinction between conventional and nuclear forces?

      Are you keen on running a colonial police force again? Do you think the Russians and Chinese make a distinction?

  2. Will he release it or hide behind this leadership rubbish and then if he looses let it get licked down the line. For once he needs show real leadership and get on with it, enough of the warm words and hinted at prommises, get on with it. Labour talked a good defence but really have not done what they said they might/could/should do

    • The extra funding is being announced this week, its £18 billion over four years. it’s being delayed because of the media frenzy over a leadership contests that doesn’t actually exist. No one in labour has supported a leadership challenge. No one in labour will ever support Wes Streeting

      Andy Burnham may well not even get to parliament.

      • The leadership contest may not have been triggered yet but we all know it exists. Yes of course it initially relies on Burnham getting a seat, failing that another challenger will show his hand. I personally would love Starmer to stay, he’s doing a great job destroying Labour.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here