The recently concluded sinking exercise (SINKEX) called Atlantic Thunder 22 allowed an American P-8 maritime patrol aircraft to execute a coordinated time-on-target using Harpoon anti-ship missiles from the Royal Navy’s HMS Westminster.

The target was decommissioned Oliver Hazard Perry Class frigate ex-USS Boone.

Coordinated time on target shots such as the one conducted by HMS Westminster require precise multinational cooperation via detailed planning, communications, and tactical data link employment from multiple nations and services.

The U.S. Navy say that successful coordinated shots are remarkably effective in overwhelming a potential combatant’s defences by delivering rapid amounts of ordnance on target simultaneously and from multiple trajectories and domains.

The U.S. Navy say that a “time-on-target strike” is when all munitions arrived on the target nearly at the same time. Using Naval Integrated Fires (NIFE), the target coordinates were transmitted to HMS Westminster for the warship to launch two Harpoons passively. That was the first time NIFE has been used to carry out an attack on a real target in a multinational environment.

“Various joint and multinational assets collaborated on the Hebrides Deep Sea Range off Scotland’s northwest coast in order to achieve the exercise’s main tactical objective, sinking the decommissioned USS Boone. Combat Air Crew Six (CAC-6) was selected to carry out the coordinated time on target strike portion of the exercise with the AGM-84D Harpoon, an anti-ship missile developed by Boeing.

Atlantic Thunder 2022 proved to be a rousing success for all participants, as it not only accomplished all of its primary objectives and sunk the decommissioned USS Boone, but according to the UK’s after-action report, the process ‘achieved several firsts for the U.K. and U.S. in terms of advanced warfighting techniques and delivering complex weapon effects against a realistic target.’

Ultimately, the ship formerly known as the USS Boone stood no chance against the ‘remarkable amount of combined firepower within a short period.’ First to hit the ex-Boone were two SM-6 missiles, courtesy of the USS Arleigh Burke. This was followed in short order by the coordinated Harpoon shot conducted by CAC-6 and HMS Westminster.

At precisely 1521Z, the AGM-84D Harpoon launched from the P-8A had a rendezvous with two surface launched AGM-84D Harpoons via the HMS Westminster into the hull of the ex-Boone. HMS Westminster’s portion of coordinated time on target strike included passive over-the-horizon-targeting generated by U.S. Naval Integrated Fires (NIFE), marking the first time this type of targeting has ever been accomplished against a real life target with multinational collaboration.

The U.S. Navy also stressed that the decommissioned USS Boone was prepared and configured specifically to meet stringent Environmental Protection Agency standards.

“This was done to mitigate potential adverse effects and keep risk to the environment as low as practicable. In addition to the ex-Boone’s configuration, strict acoustic and visual monitoring from multiple sources on the range ensured that the risk posed by the exercise to marine mammals was extremely low.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Bloke down the pub
Bloke down the pub (@guest_674656)
1 year ago

The Perrys are tough old birds. Pity the Navy didn’t get to add Sea Venom to the mix.

SteveP
SteveP (@guest_674661)
1 year ago

They were great ships. One survived a hit by a mine and one a hit by Exocet so they were tough ships as you say.
Very capable for their time as well (particularly the ones with the lengthened hulls). A good ASW helicopter backed up by decent ASW sensors on the ship, SSM’s and (unusually for a frigate), an area defence SAM with a medium gun and CIWS back up.
It’s a testament to them that they’re still in service with a number of navies.

Last edited 1 year ago by SteveP
Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_674664)
1 year ago

Looks like OHT info came over Link 16. Dog legging a Harpoon is pretty much standard practise. You always want multiple missiles coming in from multiple bearings at the same time. The mission planning suite for Harpoon allows you to do that and does all the calculation of missile course, flight times, homing head activation and launch times to achieve a time on target strike One problem is that dog legging missiles reduces the straight line target to shooter engagement range . Missile flight range in a straight line may be 100Km but by adding dog legs then drops that… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_674667)
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

Given that we also have a fleet of P8 this would seem like a Harpoon upgrade trial.

The way it is written is that the P8 had real time control of the Harpoons. I don’t think this would work with the older blocks.

The P8 being in the loop gets round the RoE wrt target identification.

IRL wouldn’t the P8 launch a Harpoon from one direction and the other platform(s) launch from different direction(s) thus solving the dog leg conundrum?

Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_674693)
1 year ago

UK harpoons dont have a data link so once they fly thats it…(and you hope a car ferry with 3000 persons onboard doesnt wander into the seeker head basket!) The P8 wouldn’t have had control. It could have provided OHT data via Link 16. However the ship needs to input the flight data into the harpoons via the console in the OPS Room. There is no other way of doing it that I know of. Even when you use the ships own radar info to go for a target you still have to plan and input the flight data via… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_674696)
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

I’m implying that it wasn’t the RN sticks being used.

There is a newer system than the old targeting consoles…..

It is a guess. Otherwise why do the test?

Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_674755)
1 year ago

I cannot see how you get the info into Harpoon without a console. It needs to know a certain amount of info before it flies. That info comes via the console from various ships systems .There may have been a special trials black box on the console taking data from the P8 Link 16 connection but the range safety and weapon safety implications of that would be huge and I am pretty sure a none starter.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_674697)
1 year ago

If the latest Harpoon is not dead yet then maybe the RN could now get upgraded Harpoon’s across the whole T23/T45 fleet, plus the l P8s and maybe even sub launched versions in addition to the TLAM V5s? Or maybe this latest Harpoon tech is already with the LRASM/NSM/ JSM? Anyway it’s good to see some anti-ship action. We sure need all our own ships to also have more than adequate anti-ship defences to repel these level of attacks including supersonics and hypersonics.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky (@guest_674728)
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

👍🙏