Guto Bebb, the recently appointed UK Minister for Defence Procurement, visited the Clyde today and announced some Type 26 Frigate news after accepting a new OPV.

During the visit BAE Systems he announced the signing of a £5.6 million contract with General Electric to establish an Electrical Integration and Test Facility in Whetstone, Leicestershire, to enable critical de-risking integration tests for the Type 26 propulsion systems.

The agreement, which follows a previous Design Development contract signed in 2016, brings the total committed investment in the facility to around £13 million.

According to BAE in a press release:

“With a cutting edge platform design and the ability to adapt to the requirements of different navies, the Type 26 design has been proposed for the Australian Government’s anti-submarine warfare frigate programme and the Canadian Surface Combatant programme.”

Recently, Bebb confirmed that eight Type 26 Frigate will be built on the Clyde, the fourth time the Government have been asked to confirm this in as many months.

Chris Stephens, Shadow SNP Spokesperson for Trade Unions and Workers’ Rights asked:

“Will the Minister confirm that the eight Type 26 frigates will be built on the Clyde? Will he also remove the ban on Royal Navy personnel addressing the all-party parliamentary group on shipbuilding and ship repair on the national shipbuilding strategy?”

Guto Bebb, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence, answered:

“I regret that I did not hear the second part of the intervention, but the commitment on the purchase of the eight Type 26s was clear, and I will be on the Clyde on Thursday.

The second element of the strategy is design. It is about taking a new approach to design and construction. We want to challenge outdated naval standards and introduce new ones. In effect, I am repeating the comments of the Chairman of the Defence Committee, my right hon. Friend the Member for New Forest East, but it is about forcing through advances in design, identifying new materials and looking at new manufacturing methods to try to make our shipbuilding industry even more competitive, which is part and parcel of ensuring that we have export markets.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Steeper
6 years ago

Hopefully the govt will insist these work in warm water !

Paul.P
Paul.P
6 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

LOL. Someone had to say it.

Pacman27
Pacman27
6 years ago

Its also a great sales pitch for our allies who are interested in purchasing T31/T26. we have invested heavily in de-risking…. could be money well spent

Callum
Callum
6 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

It’s curious though. The idea behind T31 is to produce a cheaper design more suitable for export, and yet it’s the T26 that seems to be generating all the interest abroad.

Elliott
Elliott
6 years ago
Reply to  Callum

Because the USN’s NAVSEA heard budget and cost effective in the same sentence. Usually if it is cheap they don’t want it.
“We are to poor for cheap things.”

David Steeper
6 years ago
Reply to  Elliott

Ouch !

Jack Wyatt
Jack Wyatt
6 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

There is an article late last year confirming LM2500 Gas Turbines are being built in Australia for the SEA 5000 future frigates. It is unclear from BAE comments if critical de-risking includes the LM2500 GT propulsion. Also, is the timing of the de-risking appropriate ie after construction has commenced?

Steve
Steve
6 years ago

the arsene wrenger of the political world. I didn’t hear it.

Ron5
Ron5
6 years ago

Having a brand new Minister responsible for defense procurement every year is part of the problem. By the time they learn how to spell frigate, they’re whisked away to eff something else up.

A quick perusal of Mr Bebb’s background shows a complete lack of anything that would qualify him for this job. Nothing new there of course. None of his predecessors did either.

Chris
Chris
6 years ago
Reply to  Ron5

Ron5 – as I pointed out when the experts here decried the appointment of Williamson as SecDef because he had never served we do not need politicians with deep military skills. That is what Defence Staff are for. Indeed putting Sub Lieutenant Mordaunt as Foreign Aid Sec. was actually a shrewd move FOR defence. She will certainly be watching how her money is spent to avert criticism from down the hall. You can just imagine the jealousies aroused if Mordaunt had been made SecDef… Crabs and Pongos in disarray and the Andrew well chuffed. Great fun but not good politics.… Read more »

Ron5
Ron5
6 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Reading comprehension seems a tad beyond you. I was very clearly talking about Mr Bebb.

Paul
Paul
6 years ago

Calm down, Ron5.