Aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth will soon depart Portsmouth to conduct training in UK waters with F-35 jets.

Aircraft from 207 Squadron, the UK’s F-35 Lightning training squadron, will join the carrier in UK waters within the next week or two.

It hasn’t been revealed where in UK waters the latest round of fixed wing flights will take place, but we’ll do our best to keep you updated! The purpose of the training, according to OC 207 Squadron is full Carrier and LSO Qualifications for 207 Squadron instructors – and the first F-35 CQ in UK waters.

Next year, HMS Queen Elizabeth will deploy operationally with two frigates, two destroyers, a nuclear submarine and support vessels.

Commodore Michael Utley, Commander United Kingdom Carrier Strike Group, is reported by Save The Royal Navy here as saying that HMS Queen Elizabeth will be escorted by two Type 45 destroyers, two Type 23 frigates, a nuclear submarine, a Tide-class tanker and RFA Fort Victoria.

The ship will also carry 24 F-35B jets, including US Marine Corps aircraft, in addition to a number of helicopters.

 

Prior to the deployment, it is understood that the Queen Elizabeth carrier strike group will go through a work-up trial off the west Hebrides range sometime in early 2021.

When asked about whether or not the UK has enough escorts to do this without impacting other commitment, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said:

“The size and the scale of the escort depends on the deployments and the task that the carrier is involved in. If it is a NATO tasking in the north Atlantic, for example, you would expect an international contribution to those types of taskings, in the same way as we sometimes escort the French carrier or American carriers to make up that.

It is definitely our intention, though, that the carrier strike group will be able to be a wholly UK sovereign deployable group. Now, it is probably not necessary to do that every single time we do it, depending on the tasking, but we want to do that and test doing it. Once we have done that, depending on the deployment, of course, we will cut our cloth as required.”

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
maurice10

Maybe it might make more sense to concentrate the future naval structure around the two carrier groups and less on Singelton global patroling. The only issue I have with that plan is in our post Brexit existence, we will be under growing pressure to roll into any trade deal some form of defence support? However, monitoring and protecting trade routes from major power abuse, with carrier groups would be exactly the right strategy. Whatever scenario is deployed, more hulls will be required going forward.

BB85

Any meaningful trade deal will be with countries who can look after themselves.

maurice10

Some Middle Eastern countries are meaningful, but tend to link some military factors into their deals. However, significant states can also include an element of mutual defence into agreements.

ChariotRider

There’s that phrase again, ‘cut our cloth as required’.

The cynic in me notes that usually means cuts, but I also note that Ben Wallace has used the phrase twice now in the context of our armed forces being too small. So the optimist in me is wondering if we might at least see some small improvement in the situation. Perhaps, Ben Wallace is going to be good for the armed forces?

It’s only a small flicker of optimism, honest.

QEC programme is one bright light anyway…

Levi Goldsteinberg

I initially had a dim view of the future of our armed forces under another apathetic Tory government but Wallace’s language while speaking under CCR has given me a glimmer of hope. Particularly so when he wrote I think in The Times about how the UK can no longer rely on the US as a steadfast ally and must be able to support itself militarily

ChariotRider

Hi Levi,

Yeh, I noticed that quote doing the rounds as well. I think it was even reported on the BBC News..!

Frank62

We’ve had positive language from defence secrataries before but cuts still came. Let’s see increases in the fleet rather than fine words to deceive the public.

Steve R

Problem is that it’s not Wallace who is the problem, same as it wasnt Penny Mordant or Gavin Williamson before.

The problem is with the Treasury. Is Sajid Javid likely to allocate more money for defence? Sadly I suspect not.

Mike

Hopefully Ben Wallace will remain in post after the next Cabinet reshuffle.

ChariotRider

If he lasts more than 6 months he’ll be doing better than too many of his recent predecessor.

Nigel Collins

Not looking very promising is it?

“Johnson calls off meeting on defence review after policy split”

https://www.ft.com/content/07143b64-3948-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4

MT

You will have to give us some detail of the article’s content as it’s subscribers only. Thanks

Nigel Collins
ChariotRider

Hi Nigel,

Reading the article is rather depressing, so much for my earlier optimism, but it seems nothing is yet decided.

Levi Goldsteinberg

Summary for those of us without a subscription to FT?

ChariotRider
rfn_weston

I read the article myself earlier… Yet again it seems that QEC Class is in the firing line… Strap in for SDSR 2010 Cer 2.0 chaps, I don’t think it will be pretty. Colourful yet empty words again I’m afraid from the DefSec.

James

Little help: why does the QE Class sit what appears to be much higher in the water than either the Nimitz or Ford Classes? Is it a simple design choice – e.g. to fit another deck in the hull?

ChariotRider

Hi James,

From what I’ve read I think the QEC are designed with a quite a bit of future growth built in, so I guess they ride higher in the water reflecting the 5,000 tons or so of spare capacity.

James

Ah. Jam tomorrow? ;o)
Thanks.

Herodotus

Not carrying much in the way of ordnance and aviation fuel I would guess!

the_marquis

“It is definitely our intention, though, that the carrier strike group will be able to be a wholly UK sovereign deployable group.” I would say this is an interesting departure from previous announcements from various figures in the RN, MOD and HMG that repeated the assumption that NATO/allied ships would routinely deploy as part of the UK CSG. Blithely relying on our allies to cover our own inadequacies is a recipe for disaster: after all, as the 2nd largest defence spender in NATO and one of the few to meet the 2% target (albeit with a healthy dose of creative… Read more »

John Stevens

I thought the original plan was to have a Royal Netherlands Navy Air warfare destroyer as part of the escort for the 2021 carrier deployment ?

andy reeves

looking forward to a picture of her with a deck full of aircraft.

Frank62

Short answer: Everybody with knowlage of defence matters knows we’re way short of the escort numbers we need for the commitments we have even before the QEs are considered.
Plus there’s nothing yet in the pipeline to alter that!

Ron

Just been reading that this has been cancelled, anyone know if that is correct and if so why?