The Type 23 Frigate will be deployed amid what the Defence Secretary has called ‘a period of ongoing tension in the Korean peninsula’.

This is the second warship sent to the Asia Pacific region. HMS Argyll will deploy to Japan to take part in exercises in December 2018 following participation in a Five Power Defence Arrangements exercise with Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Malaysia.

Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson said:

“Our already strong defence ties with allies in the Asia Pacific area will be deepened further by this deployment.

At a time when North Korea’s illegal weapons programme is causing global concern, the deployment of these two Royal Navy ships is a clear demonstration of the UK’s commitment to the peace and prosperity of the region.”

HMS Sutherland is a Type 23 frigate, her original design role was anti-submarine warfare, but she can be employed in a variety of roles.

The type form the core of the Royal Navy’s destroyer and frigate fleet and serve alongside the Type 45 destroyers. Originally designed for anti-submarine warfare in the North Atlantic, the Royal Navy’s Type 23 frigates have proven their versatility in warfighting, peace-keeping and maritime security operations around the globe. Thirteen Type 23 frigates remain in service with the Royal Navy, with three vessels having been sold to Chile and handed over to the Chilean Navy.

30
Leave a Reply

13 Comment threads
17 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
14 Comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Steve

The type 23’s cosmetically are really looking their age and look like something from another era compared to the t45’s.

Although if you had a choice which you would prefer backing you up, the reliability of the t23 would always win.

Julian

Such a shame about the T45 reliability because, apart from that, they seem to be superb at what they were designed for, an AAW specialist (I say “seem to be” because they’ve not been tested in a real attack but hopefully they would live up to expectations). Maybe that’s a silver lining for how long it’s going to take us to get everything worked up and enough F-35Bs delivered before the carriers can go operational because that’s when the T45 specialist role really comes into its own for what it will contribute to the CBG. Hopefully the reliability issues can… Read more »

Nick Bowman

I’m surprised we would send one of only eight ships equipped with Type 2087 towed array sonar to facedown a navy with no modern submarines. Surely the eight best anti-submarine frigates should be focused on carrier escort or ASW patrol missions?

Lee H

Evening
They may not be modern but there are many of them.
Good opportunity to test 2087 against Japanese sub and in different water conditions as well.
Hopefully it will deploy with a Merlin, as designed but I am not holding my breath…

Nick Bowman

You have a point, Lee. Given the prolific ASW assets of the JMSDF, Sutherland’s presence will be more valuable as a symbol of moral support than for any great additional capability it might provide.

james

I think that the underlying purpose of the deployment will also be transition of the South China Sea and freedom of navigation, so sending a T45, which might be more appropriate, was out of the question for a warm water deployment until its engine problems are well solved. Better still would be a T23 and T45 with a fleet tanker. That’s not viable though is it. Its also a preparation deployment for a small CBG in 2021. Despite anti american feelings and its none of our business positions or its not in our virtual national interests such a deployment should… Read more »

james

From the photo it looks like she has GK as CIWS? yes?

Paul

Cant see where to be honest ,not aware that they have ever been equipped with any CIWS but happy to be proved wrong.

Steven Kirkland

What are we doing REALLY?

Sky New REPORTING

Defence minister Tobias Ellwood ‘prepared to resign’ over cuts to Army by 12000

Paul.P

The Times is reporting the MOD has to find cuts of £2.1 billion out of a defence budget of £35 billion.

Pacman27

The budget needs to be £40bn to be 2% of GDP as published by the MOD

Paul.P

Maybe the Times knows something that we don’t about the GDP.

Steve

The 12k figure doesn’t surprise me, i have posted multiple times here that if the navy is losing 2 albions and 1k marines, then the army would also lose big. If you put the head of the navy/army/airforce in a room and ask them to work out cuts that are best for the overall, you can guarantee each of them will only be interested in their own service and so the net result would be equal value cuts for each service. Absolute madness to cut the army further, considering how badly numbered they were during 2 recent conflicts (iraq/afgan). I… Read more »

Steve

Lets just hope its not true.

Arran

I’d disagree completely. We’re an Island nation. Our strength has always been our naval assets. Navy and Air force should be before the Army. While I agree with most on this website that cuts are bad we should be looking to what we as the UK need. Protecting our airspace and shipping lanes should be number one. It’s quicker to train infantry then to build ships/planes if the world did go to hell I’d figure.

The Empire is gone, there isn’t much land we need an Army to hold onto. At least alone.

Daniele Mandelli

I totally disagree with your reasoning Steve that the RN is less needed. I would suggest that the RN and the RAF are equally the main power projection assets of a military. Of the three services it is the army most in need of reform or which the UK could use differently. We are an Island nation. As such any military operation oversees by necessity requires power projection of a navy and an air force, either on their own or in putting the army into theatre. Home defence wise the RN and RAF are also prime. ASCS radar providing the… Read more »

Lee H

The Govt. will never get the votes, whilst defence is not always the highest on the agenda of the public within the ranks of the Tory Party it is up there with Europe. More interestingly, who are the tidies in a confidence and supply arrangement with? Pretty sure one of the DUP redlines will be defence of the realm.
Treasury need to recognise – defence matters.
Stand by for resignations and MP’s crossing the floor.
Torrid now leading by 8 and budget is done.
May election anyone??

Lee H

Apologies for spelling – iPhone believes it can spell better than i

Daniele Mandelli

DUP factor a good point actually.
I hope they have noticed!

Geoffrey Roach

Gavin Williamson “shocked” by proposals put before him. Says £2 billion per annum extra is required and wants to meet Hammond ASAP……..Thirty plus Tory MP’S threaten to rebel if cuts go ahead.

WRITE/EMAIL YOUR MP NOW.

Mr Bell

Agree Geoff we all need to write to our MPs immediately if we cannot afford defence why the heck are we sending £13 billion a year on foreign aid. we cannot afford a Brexit divorce bill of £40 billion. The EU do not want to agree a free trade deal so lets just walk away and spend that £40 billion on defence, social care, the nhs, infrastructure, education. Put corporation tax back up by 2-3%, the Torries gave big business a tax cut in 2010! that will yield £7-8 billion a year cut the tax loopholes outlined in the paradise… Read more »

Steve

Putting corporate tax up is a no go, and will need to fall more. For the UK to stand on its own post brexit, we need to encourage big businesses to stay / move to the country and raising corporation tax will do the reverse. The reduction in the corp tax is as a result of lower taxes in committing countries, such as ireland, luxemburg etc. Its not the same as employee personal tax, where we don’t have much choice but to pay it. Same with the tax loopholes, they are there for a reason, they are there to encourage… Read more »

Mr Bell

Back to military matters the north Koreans are using their large fleet of conventional powered old subs as their sole ballistic missile launch platform.
they have such a large sub fleet they could threaten a surface warship group hence why sub hunting with type 23s is potentially going to be the most important factor alongside airpower in any Korean conflict.

Pacman27

You know – we dont have to leave the EU to give Brexiteers what they want. We just say we will remain then refuse to accept those areas of EU legislation we dont like, that is what Germany, France and Italy in particular do. We should also state that the UK will not put a penny more into the EU without a fully verified and audited set of accounts (they have never been able to do this – not once). Net result – we remain in the EU – have a hard border where we want and actually start putting… Read more »

Mr Bell

Paceman you raise a good point. I never voted for Brexit, yet was prepared to support Brexit due to principles of living in a democracy. I think if Brexit is going to cost the UK so much that our armed forces will be so weakened we should remain in the EU. besides which being outside the EU means we cannot moderate the EUs behaviour. The NAO are now reporting that by 2025 the uk will be £70-80 billion a year worse off outside the EU then within. If we as a nation decide that remaining is better then leaving we… Read more »

Ian B57

Brexit campaign was flawed but successful. In Wilshire virtually all I saw were UKIP posters or Leave. Everyone going on about controls we would have. Rubbish as one of our closest allies Ireland threatening to delay Brexit. We will spend more on border controls which could be spent on defence (and will fail anyway because we will have more asylum seekers anyway). We have a declining economy in terms of growth, where manufacturing which is small enough, sees firms indicating long term transfer to Europe. We used to produce likes of home-owned helicopters which are now foreign owned. BAE and… Read more »

Ian B57

Excuse typo – Britain

Paul.P

I see North Korea has just launched another ballistic missile which has overflown Japanese air space. Have to say the Japanese are being very restraimed about this. Would be nice to send a Type 45 and let it have a crack at shooting down the next one.

Daniele Mandelli

I thought it had been discussed already here that T45 cannot do that yet?

Personally I’d keep the hell out of it and concentrate on NATO Europe and combating terrorists throughout the Middle East.

Even if we could I’d doubt the yanks would let us! They’d want the Kudos themselves.

Paul.P

Yeh, your’re right. Just letting my imagination run away with me. MBDA say Aster Block 1 NT can hit tactical ballistic missiles but Kim already has ICBMs so only the US systems will do.