Home Sea Rear half of HMS Cardiff rolled out of build hall

Rear half of HMS Cardiff rolled out of build hall

43
Rear half of HMS Cardiff rolled out of build hall

The aft section of second Type 26 Frigate HMS Cardiff was rolled out of the build hall earlier today.

The forward ‘superblock’ will be joined to the aft ‘superblock’ soon. The mast will also soon be added to the vessel.

Here’s some footage.

The Type 26 represents the future backbone of the Royal Navy and eight of the class are planned, starting with HMS Glasgow. The eight ships will replace the eight dedicated anti-submarine Type 23 frigates which will reach the end of their active lives by the mid 2030s. In addition to the Clyde built Type 26, five Rosyth built Type 31 general purpose frigates are intended to replace the general-purpose Type 23s currently in service and also coming towards the end of their long careers.

More information on the drone footage

We have verified the drone footage as being legal, as we always do, but we thought it best to include this section.

In the United Kingdom, drone flights are managed by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), and adherence to these rules is essential to ensure the legal operation of drones. For the footage captured, the operator used a sub-250g drone.

Under UK legislation (Article 95 of the Air Navigation Order 2016), drones of this weight are exempt from minimum distance requirements from people, vessels, vehicles, and structures. Despite this exemption, the operator maintained a prudent distance from the shipyard and the ship, focusing the drone’s flight path over the river and nearby grassland as an added safety measure.

In addition to these legal requirements and precautions, the operator also followed several best practice guidelines to ensure the safe and legal operation of the drone. The operator was registered with the CAA and had secured the necessary Operator ID for the drone. Thorough pre-flight checks were conducted, including checking the weather for safe flying conditions and reviewing Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) for any temporary airspace restrictions. During the flight, the operator actively monitored for nearby aircraft to avoid any risk of interference.

These thorough measures, while not all mandated by law, demonstrated the operator’s commitment to safety and regulatory standards, further ensuring the legality and safety of the drone flight.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

43 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ABCRodney
ABCRodney
9 months ago

Just comparing her to the same stage when Glasgow was rolled out 2 years ago. Is it me or does the rear end look a lot less finished than when Glasgow was rolled out. Far more red Primer and the back acoustic section isn’t visible.

Great pictures George as always.

Paul42
Paul42
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

Indeed, it is a lot less finished – why?

Bringer of Facts
Bringer of Facts
9 months ago
Reply to  Paul42

They need the indoor spaces for Belfast and Birmingham ?

Last edited 9 months ago by Bringer of Facts
PhilWestMids
PhilWestMids
9 months ago

Possibly after the build of Glasgow it was determined that certain stages of the build could be done differently/more efficiently.

Last edited 9 months ago by PhilWestMids
SMSgtMac
SMSgtMac
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

Or, it is just as finished as it needs to be, in ways that need to be, leveraging lesson learned from hull number 1

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

Actually impressed that there were active operations on a Sunday. Typical, or has someone increased the pace dial? ,🤔

ABCRodney
ABCRodney
9 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

If I were a betting man I’d guess they have turned the dial up, but that can only happen if the treasury has sped up the staged payments.
One of the major criticisms of the T26 build has been the snails pace of work which was caused by how the treasury pays its bills.
On the other hand it could just be that the weather is lovely, they knew George was out with his drone and they are all on Double Time.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

😁

Jim
Jim
9 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

They’re are now employing Ferguson marine to carry out work which suggests the dial has been turned up.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
9 months ago
Reply to  Jim

There are a range of speeds marked on the engine telegraph:-

Full Ahead
Cruise
Dead Slow
Ferguson Ferry Production Speed
Stopped
Astern
Ferguson Ferry Speed Rework
Full Astern

That might suggest the dial has been turned down below zero?

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
9 months ago

😁

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
9 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Things are clearly a bit behind.

The best day to do these mega operations is a day not too much is going on.

That way it doesn’t impact all the other activities in the yard as the area of the shift will be closed to vehicular and foot traffic for safety reasons.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
9 months ago

Quite a plausible alternative explanation.

Paul T
Paul T
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

In terms of paintwork it might just be the case that they are confident of making use of the remaining summer months to finish the work outside, freeing up the shed for Belfast.

ABCRodney
ABCRodney
9 months ago
Reply to  Paul T

Painting outside in Summer in Scotland, not good. I once tried touching up the paint on my 1st mini in September. It looked like it had been micro pebble dashed ! Midges in the paintwork 🤭

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

More about humidity and salt control than anything else.

If you are painting outdoor it is pretty inevitable that you end up with salt inclusions in the paint.

ABCRodney
ABCRodney
9 months ago

Bearing in mind how the 2 hull sections Of Glasgow looked on rollout, are you surprised by the state Cardiffs stern is in ?

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

Yes.

They are clearly behind schedule and to make sure this build did not impede the next two: it had to be moved out of the shed.

ambvalent lurker
ambvalent lurker
8 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

TBH I’d reckon Cardiff’s stern section is far more complete now than HMS Glasgow was as it should have the main gearboxes already fitted (after the stern and bow sections were fully integrated, Glasgow had to have its hull cut open during late summer/autumn’21 to have the delayed gearbox installation done)

maurice10
maurice10
9 months ago

Where’s the missin bit?

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
9 months ago
Reply to  maurice10

That’s the “stealth” section.. 😆

Andrew
Andrew
9 months ago
Reply to  maurice10

Due to treasury restrictions, she is fitted for, but not with a middle bit!

maurice10
maurice10
9 months ago
Reply to  Andrew

Typical!😥

Jim
Jim
9 months ago
Reply to  maurice10

It’s Glasgow so the middle bit is taken away at night and stored separately in case anyone try’s to Knick it. 😀

maurice10
maurice10
9 months ago
Reply to  Jim

Solved!😄

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
9 months ago
Reply to  Jim

😄

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
8 months ago
Reply to  Jim

Love it Jim! Aye, you’re sounding like a bit of Billy Connolly there!

Geoff Roach
Geoff Roach
9 months ago

How refreshing. The frigate with the hole.🍩Couldn’t find a mint !!!

ABCRodney
ABCRodney
9 months ago

This isn’t exactly good news, when you do the maths this is 2 years and 2 months since HMS Glasgow was at the same stage !
I know they are hampered by the way they are having to build them, which is in 2 halves, then joined together, masts and funnel added and then barged out.
But it is incredibly slow progress, the T45 are bigger and we’re mega block built and assembled outside on the slipway and on a yearly drumbeat
I just hope the new Frigate shed gets them back up to speed.

Bringer of facts
Bringer of facts
9 months ago
Reply to  ABCRodney

I think the pace is picking up, construction on Belfast started 2 years ago. First steel was cut for Birmingham in April this year, lets hope those new buildings will create more capacity in a few months time.

John
John
9 months ago

Can’t understand the logic of not painting the external hull while it’s indoors it would have been completed in less than a week in controlled conditions ,seems todays planners don’t know what they are doing

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
9 months ago
Reply to  John

They are about to do a shed load of welding midships. After that it will need blasting either side of the welded area and the paint system applying which is probably a 3 coat above the waterline and 4 or 5 coat below the water line. For the below the waterline especially you have max/min times between coats which for the minimum time is measured in a hours to a couple of days. Once you start application you dont want to stop. Total time to apply a 5 coat system probably 72 hrs. They will plastic sheet the external hull… Read more »

John
John
9 months ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

I know exactly how hull painting is done with prefabricated assemblies , I worked 3 years in Hyundai in South Korea where they churn out ships of all sizes and types like a production line , many lessons could be learned from there including warship building indoors where you should maximise your completions including paint systems

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
9 months ago
Reply to  John

Exactly so.

There is fully optimised efficiency – climate controlled build halls.

And there is make-do by using plastic sheeting round scaffold which never works as well.

Jonathan
Jonathan
9 months ago
Reply to  John

Unfortunately one of the banes of the British ship building industry has always been an unwillingness to invest in infrastructure that creates efficiency and was one of the three nails in the ship building coffins and was actually the first one ( it was the trigger to the loss of market share in 1945-1955, due to an inability to meet increased demand)..the second was labour relations (1960s to 1980s) and the third insurmountable one was labour costs.

John
John
9 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Exactly everything was to suit the yard owners who would not invest in infrastructure or equipment as there was no guarantee of continuous work and hence the whole industry collapsed due to overseas competition , the yards at the moment are still in catch up mode to be more efficient and able to compete in the open markets

Andrew
Andrew
9 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Another issue is the size and location of the remaining British yards…. They are smaller and in more cramped locations generally that the Asian yards, which just seemed to be much larger/purpose built for the larger ships of today…

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
9 months ago

Maybe from this photo we can imagine the potential length of a “stretched T26” T83 here if another section was added in the gap?

Last edited 9 months ago by Quentin D63
Pacman27
Pacman27
9 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

We don’t need a stretched version for AAW. Do away with the mission space and add loads of vls.

T26 AAW is a no brainer and we should leverage the hull to maximum potential by ordering another 8. This would give us a very good escort fleet and allow us to fully kit out the CSGs and LSGs with required high end escorts it also extracts maximum value out of this design.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
8 months ago
Reply to  Pacman27

The ships body of the BAE AAW proposal for the RAN does look a bit like a join of the front end of Australian T26 with the mid-back end of the T45, minus the mission space and muscled up with lots of vls. They seemed to have knocked that up on the quiet. And I’d imagine with a much heavier tonnage the ship will need an extras GT to push it along?

Paul T
Paul T
9 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Posters on here with knowledge of Naval Architecture have explained why a stretched T26 won’t work.Whatever the T83 ends up being the consensus is it will not be based on T26.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
8 months ago
Reply to  Paul T

Will the “real T83” please stand up! 😁

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
9 months ago

Many thanks for the up date George. Moving ahead.