Official documents pertaining to a Royal Navy submarine were reportedly discovered in the restroom of a Wetherspoons pub.

The files, marked “Official Sensitive”, were found in the facilities at The Furness Railway in Cumbria, as reported by The Sun.

The documents are said to reveal the submarine’s inner workings and were allegedly utilised by submariners during training exercises, specifically for isolating and depressurising components of the vessel’s system.

The Royal Navy has stated that no classified information was present in the papers discovered.

An anonymous source informed The Sun here that the pub was bustling when the documents, labeled “official sensitive,” were located in a restroom stall, accompanied by a Royal Navy lanyard.

A Royal Navy spokesman said:

“These are generic training documents that carry no classified information. However, we take all security matters extremely seriously and will investigate the circumstances of their discovery.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

50 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Farouk
Farouk
11 months ago

I see nobody is asking questions about the missing carrier bag those docs were in

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
11 months ago
Reply to  Farouk

Was it a nice bag? Did it have other stuff in it

Gavin Gordon
Gavin Gordon
11 months ago
Reply to  Farouk

Where else indeed – Aloe Vera?

Farouk
Farouk
11 months ago
Reply to  Farouk

It appears my squaddie humour dig at the lack of a carrier bag has gone over the heads of most people. (Theres a clue in that sentence)

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
11 months ago
Reply to  Farouk

Very high over my head.

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
11 months ago

For years various spooks have been allowed to remove classified documents and take them home. Boris Johnson’s flat above 10 Downing Street was said to be full of them, in spite of numerous of his chums having the flat access codes. Security staff at Barrow in Furness should review people who have access to this sort of information and make sure that they don’t have any Russian contacts

Andy P
Andy P
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

David, this stuff really isn’t that sensitive, its the equivalent of the old posters of how to strip down an SLR that were marked RESTRICTED. Its real low level stuff, compartment layout, where valves are, where fire fighting gear is etc. I’ve still got some old documentation like this somewhere in a spare room, some from A boats. Guys take it home to swot up on for their system knowledge to be signed off or for ‘walkrounds’ to get qualified. While its not great someone left it loafing in a pub, its the Sun making something out of nothing to… Read more »

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
11 months ago
Reply to  Andy P

Andy, lets hope what we are being told about the security level of the docs is accurate.

David Barry
David Barry
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

I’ve let the SIB know, they’ll kick your door in circa 03:00, don’t be worried.

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor
11 months ago
Reply to  Andy P

Thanks Andy, don’t deprive the children of an opportunity to get hysterical!

Mark B
Mark B
11 months ago
Reply to  OkamsRazor

😂

Bob
Bob
11 months ago
Reply to  Andy P

It is not so much the level of classification of the documents but the lack of discipline of the carrier.
In my opinion it was a mistake to move away from the old classification system, “Official Sensitive” covers too wide a range of material, while users see it as no worse than “Restricted”

Andy P
Andy P
11 months ago
Reply to  Bob

“It is not so much the level of classification of the documents but the lack of discipline of the carrier.” No, you’ve got that arse about face. It really is about the level of classification. If something more highly classified was left then it would have potentially greater consequences. That’s why all that stuff is locked away with limited access. This stuff left in the boozer is widely distributed and really only ‘classified’ as everything pretty much is, I believe they’ve done away with the old UNCLASSIFIED level so basically anything and everything has the new “Official Sensitive” title. You… Read more »

Deep32
Deep32
11 months ago
Reply to  Andy P

When I first heard this, I immediately thought PT 3 book! If it is and like everyone who’s had one, it will have this persons name in it somewhere. Agree mate, total non story.

Andy P
Andy P
11 months ago
Reply to  Deep32

Every sundodger I know (well in regular touch with) thought the same thing, the story has been passed around on whatsapp chats and penny to a pinch of shit its someone’s BSQ book. I just hope they didn’t have too many systems signed off already as you just know their ‘punishment’ will be getting issued a Harry brand spankers BSQ book negat signatures.

Gavin Gordon
Gavin Gordon
11 months ago
Reply to  Bob

In this case it was mistaken for deluxe toilet paper

Rob N
Rob N
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Spooks and politicians are not the same thing. I am sure the UK intelligence folk are a lot more careful with documents then politicians, who do not come from a security oriented culture.

James
James
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Everyone in the bloody government has access to OS – hell, even students at UOTC/UAS/URNUs and cadet forces have access to it. It’s routine information covering everything from ROE to the itinerary for an AT trip. Assuming these docs were appropriately marked (and it’s much more likely for information to be overclassified than underclassified), this story is absolutely meaningless. Worst case scenario, some rating is going to get a minor bollocking from the boss and rinsed by his mates at the bar.

terence patrick hewett
terence patrick hewett
11 months ago

“Accompanied by a RN lanyard” Golly-Gosh a Clue!…….It’s a not-very-clever set up.

Jonathan
Jonathan
11 months ago

At leat they did not forget and leave their child in the pub.

WSM
WSM
11 months ago

Subsidised drinking for the Working man (or woman) Who can begrudge a shamefully underpaid Jolly Jack a Wetherspoons curry night ? 😁 Methinks the poor unfortunate part 3 trainee is for the chop 🏴‍☠️

Jonathan
Jonathan
11 months ago

I do have to say what arse called the media, what is it with some people, just causing trouble for the fun of it…the poor bugger who left these is probably going to cop it way more now than they would have done. Clearly it was not purposeful and clearly they were just carrying around everyday stuff.Official sensitive is pretty much everything produced by the public sector that is not for public consumption and it’s not going to have any risk impact on national security…because if it did it would be “secret” not “official sensitive”. In truth the issue is… Read more »

Andrew Thorne
Andrew Thorne
11 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Totally agree with what you said. Media do make something out of nothing. Official sensitive is not like showing detailed schematics and data. I do pitty the person who left them as they will be railroaded for this.

Bob
Bob
11 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Therein lies the problem. “If it’s not “Secret” it’s not really that important”.

Jonathan
Jonathan
11 months ago
Reply to  Bob

Well it is important, but you have to be proportional on the level of protection…if your spending a fortune on protecting data that does no harm or if you cause harm by stopping people accessing it then that’s a problem in itself..that’s why they have grades of classification and guidelines around how you protect it.

Rob N
Rob N
11 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

No they should be pulled up for it – they were negligent with classified documents. This may be a wake up call to those working on these subs. He should get a right dressing down he/she deserves it. Next time it might be a secret document because folk are just getting sloppy. He should also have to justify why he took this off site and if he did why he could not have sent it by encrypted email.

Jonathan
Jonathan
11 months ago
Reply to  Rob N

It’s no point beating on the individual, you have to look at the system and why they were using paper copies in the first place..if you don’t want to loss it don’t use paper. It clearly states it was training materials..by their nature they have to be moved around and used…he was probably taking them to study up. If he was given them and told to learn them then actually what are you punishing him for…being a human being…we would run out of people in every position if we punished being a human…instead we should look at what factors can… Read more »

Rob N
Rob N
11 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Agreed it is also about the system and learning from mistakes. However the individual has responsibility too.

Hopefully Secret and above are not taken off site thus preventing their loss due to human error.

Jonathan
Jonathan
11 months ago
Reply to  Rob N

Oh yes, indeed the individual needs a bit of a chat about…well forgetting stuff related to work and leaving them in toilets…just not a mountain dropped on them…which I suspect will happen because of all this media rubbish.

If on the other hand if it was not custom and practice, culture or policy and process that tells people it’s ok to take the papers on travels..then it’s a bit more of a serious discussion with the individual.

Last edited 11 months ago by Jonathan
Jacko
Jacko
11 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Because the Arse saw pound note signs as he knew the paper would pay him for the info🙄

John McKay
John McKay
11 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The “arse” that called the media was trying to expose the numbskull level of military security guarding our country

Jack
Jack
11 months ago

None story of the month.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
11 months ago
Reply to  Jack

Agreed.

Andrew D
Andrew D
11 months ago

Good Lord 😕

Gareth
Gareth
11 months ago

So sensitive documents about a nuclear sub were indeed found in the nuclear sub….sadly we don’t have any battlecruisers to continue the slang with…

Last edited 11 months ago by Gareth
Tom
Tom
11 months ago

Why documents such as these are ‘out and about’ in public, I have no idea. The MOD or whoever is responsible, should take a leaf out of how ‘sensitive’ documents are dealt with at Dyson, where nothing is allowed away from the workplace.

Rob N
Rob N
11 months ago

Official Sensitive would not give away much of detail but it is never good when such things happen. Best practice would be mot to take the documents off site and to send them electronically from A to B and not take them HOME…

Airborne
Airborne
11 months ago

Just a bit of a none story, a group on a course did a bit of group study then went for some grub, few pints and some dipstick left course notes/handouts in the pub. It happens, it shouldn’t but it does I’m afraid.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
11 months ago
Reply to  Airborne

Are you alleging the matelots are human and that humans make mistakes?

I’m shock I tell you, shocked…..

IRL this is a nothing significant happened here moment.

There is always value to an enemy in understanding any element of any platform better. They then understand the abilities and limitation of the some systems and subsystems. It is very possible with a number of such leaks to build up quite a detailed picture of the systems and subsystems.

Very often, intelligence isn’t about stealing the blueprints but about assembling all the tit bits dropped over the years in a picture.

David Barry
David Barry
11 months ago

We’re talking about BAE Barrow where the the bfo doors of DDH were left open because it was a hot day, often, right?

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
11 months ago
Reply to  David Barry

I thought it was to provide viewing for the spectators or even to attract new spectators?

If I remember the story, in the first instance, the union said ‘this is ridiculously hot if you can’t do something we will walk out’. Management agreed it was too hot. That rattled around quite quickly and the OK was received to open the doors.

There ever after…..

Amin
Amin
11 months ago

Be careful RN

DH
DH
11 months ago
Reply to  Amin

Right then! Kit musters all round. Who’s missing a lanyard? You boy, Master, charge that man! One days ones puns to be sure 🙄.

Chris
Chris
11 months ago

Less than ideal.

I hope the culprit has grassed himself up and apologised. No great harm done but it does make you wish you were born a hundred years before.

David Barry
David Barry
11 months ago

Should the errant matelot have any grey matter, he’ll step forward and elect for a keel hauling… should be quick, pretty painless and quite dry.

Marius
Marius
11 months ago

The level of classification plays no role in intelligence gathering. It is the principle, the carelessness, that is paramount.
The on-stag squaddie idiot who lights a fag at night, the cougher in the ambush, the loose talker in the watering-hole, and yes a file in the khazi cubicle of a pub. All are signs of a creeping cancer, of rotten discipline, and in the case of this khazi cubicle, a military ethos in decline.

Robert Blay
Robert Blay
11 months ago
Reply to  Marius

Todays Armed Force’s are more professional than at any point in our history. Recruits are better educated, it’s harder to get in the Force’s. The training is better and more professional, and the drinking culture isn’t as prominent as it once was. The operation in Sudan is a perfect example of the professionalism of our Armed Force’s. Not a one off none story like this. 🇬🇧

Jon
Jon
11 months ago

Anyone considered these were swiped from under a table while the person was at the Bar or getting ketchup. and the little toe rag had gone to the WC to inspect his haul and found some paper. or are just new recruits that thick to leave there Homework behind.

Tomartyr
Tomartyr
11 months ago

Why would you take homework to the pub?

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
11 months ago

Gives a whole new meaning to the word “pub-lishing”!…sorry…groans…lol 😁