Beneath the vast, unforgiving ocean, hidden from the world and far removed from everything we take for granted, a small group of men and women carry out one of the most demanding and least understood duties in the Armed Forces.

The Royal Navy’s Submarine Service, known as the ‘Silent Service,’ exists in the shadows, unseen but always present, maintaining the country’s nuclear deterrent—a duty that has never been interrupted since 1969.

Submariners operate in total isolation. Their world is a labyrinth of steel corridors, narrow bunks, and artificial air. They work, sleep, and eat in a relatively small space, far beneath the ocean’s surface, where even the passage of time feels distorted.

A recent patrol has pushed the limits of endurance even further. The current submarine on deterrent duty will soon spend longer at sea than any previous patrol of its kind.

This is not a planned milestone; it is a necessity. The relief boat, which should have taken over, has been delayed for reasons irrelevant to this article, meaning the current crew has had to remain on station a bit beyond what would typically be expected.

There is no option to step away, no backup plan, no choice but to continue. And so, they do.

Isolation and Discipline

For those serving on board, life follows a strict and unchanging routine. There is no sunrise, no fresh air. The weeks blend into months, punctuated only by the relentless cycle of watch rotations, maintenance tasks, drills, and meals. Their bodies adjust to artificial time, their minds learn to function in a world without seasons, and they live entirely cut off from their families and the outside world.

Once the fresh food runs out in the early weeks of a patrol, there are no resupplies. The luxuries of fresh fruit, vegetables. Meals are carefully planned, designed to last, but monotony is unavoidable. Even the smallest pleasures are things submariners must learn to live without for months at a time.

More than the physical conditions, it is the mental strain that takes its toll. They miss birthdays, anniversaries, the birth of children, the loss of loved ones. And yet, they carry on. Because they have to. Because the mission demands it.

Endurance Without Recognition

What makes this latest patrol even more extraordinary is that it is being carried out by a submarine at the very edge of its service life. These boats were designed to operate for a set number of years, yet they continue to push on, because there is no alternative until the Dreadnoughts come into play.

Every additional day spent at sea is another test of the crew’s resilience, another test of the boat’s ageing systems, another challenge that must be met without question or hesitation.

New British nuclear missile submarine on track for 2030s

It is easy to overlook the scale of commitment required for this kind of duty. The crew disembarks quietly, slipping back into their lives with no fanfare, no parade, no recognition beyond those who understand the reality of what they have done. And yet, their work is among the most crucial in the defence of the nation.

The Toll of Service

Life as a submariner is not for everyone, I’m not brave enough to do it. It takes a certain kind of person to commit to months of isolation, confined within a steel tube, surrounded by the same faces every day. The pressure is constant—both literal and psychological. Mistakes cannot be afforded, as the environment is unforgiving. The knowledge that, at all times, they are the last line of defence for the nation weighs heavily on every member of the crew.

It is a life that demands resilience beyond measure. Physically, the body adjusts to the artificial conditions—limited exercise, carefully controlled oxygen levels, the absence of natural light. Mentally, the strain is immense. The mind must endure the monotony, the repetition, the sense of disconnection from reality. A submariner could emerge from patrol to find their world entirely changed. Yet, despite all this, they serve. Not for glory, not for fame, but because the job needs to be done.

A Debt

It is often said that those who serve in the Submarine Service are invisible by design. Their very existence is based on remaining undetected, their mission unspoken, their achievements unheralded. But that does not mean they should be forgotten.

Right now, somewhere beneath the ocean, a British submarine is maintaining its silent vigil, its crew cut off from the world, ensuring the security of the nation. They have endured without complaint, without question. And when their patrol finally ends, they will step ashore, return to their families, and prepare to do it all again.

They ask for nothing. They expect no thanks. But they deserve it all the same.

To the men and women of the Silent Service: your country may not see you, but we know you are there. We may not hear from you, but we know what you give. Your sacrifices are not forgotten.

You keep the watch so that others may live in peace. And for that, we owe you more than words can express.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

43 COMMENTS

    • [ 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐃𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐔𝐬 ]

      Start your career with us today and work from the comfort of your home! No skills or experience required—just your dedication and a desire to succeed. Receive your payments weekly or monthly, depending on your preference. It’s a great opportunity to kickstart your career, earn a steady income, and enjoy the flexibility of working on your own terms! So Hurry and

      Get Started Now.”….. 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝟏.𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞/

    • Why why why? I’m interested to know why we put ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads into submarines? The sea is hostile and unforgiving to engineering which means submarines need replacing regularly at a cost of billions let alone the mental toll being cooped up must have on submariners. Why not use silos or planes or if it’s a case of secrecy put them on mobile trucks that would be so much cheaper.

      • With a submarine a Country can project power anywhere around the World. Not all of the weapons on board have nuclear capability, a cruise missile can be launched from the sea 100 miles off your coast and you’d know very little about it until it was already nearing it’s target. You can’t do that with a silo, and a mobile launcher has to stay on your territory, even then you can’t just park it anywhere! A submarine slips out of dock, and just disappears for months, is it sitting in the Atlantic or Pacific? No-one will ever know.

      • Because the UK could be completely wiped out within on a minute planes, silos, trucks an all in a nuclear attack. SSBN guarantee we can retaliate to any nuclear attack in kind, Which makes us a much more unpalatable target.

      • The argument has always been that a nuclear capability that isn’t vulnerable to a surprise all out first strike is the most effective deterrent. Not only are other systems theoretically vulnerable, especially for a small country like Britain, but they would need to move to a launch on warning posture, increasing the risk of a mistake.
        Yet the biggest nuclear powers, the USA and Russia, still maintain their nuclear triads- sub, land and air launched- rather than rely wholly on the relative invulnerability of SSBNs.
        As satellite surveillance has iicreased, the ability to locate and target static systems has improved considerably, strengthening the case for SSBNs.
        But whether a single boat with a dozen missiles is really an effective deterrent to countries with larger arsenals and some ABM defences, I’m not sure.

  1. if I recall the previous patrol stayed out way longer than planned and set records as well. Doesn’t speak well for the current state of the Submarine fleet.

    • Yes it does make you wonder about the mental stress these extended patrols exert on the crew. Given the recent issues with maintenance facilities (now resolved I think?) Do the crews not get swapped out if a ‘replacement sub’ is not available or is it more difficult than that? If not then surely the risk of crew burn out shouldn’t be understated?

  2. Although being a (retired) civil servant I have the utmost respect for submariners. This comes from my experience when working with them during the build, running and refit times.

    • Yes as a retired ex SDA civil servant I dealt with SSNs on a daily basis and was always impressed with their professionalism and their sense of humour, we all owe these men and women a debt of gratitude for keeping us safe from the likes of Putin

  3. I g­e­t p­a­i­d o­v­e­r $­2­2­0 p­e­r h­o­u­r w­o­r­k­i­n­g f­r­o­m h­o­m­e w­i­t­h 2 k­i­d­s a­t h­o­m­e. I n­e­v­e­r t­h­o­u­g­h­t I w­o­u­l­d b­e a­b­l­e t­o d­o i­t b­u­t m­y b­e­s­t f­r­i­e­n­d e­a­r­n­s o­v­e­r $­3­5­,­0­0­0 a m­o­n­t­h….➤➤➤ CLICK ON PROFILE

  4. The job they’re doing is more important than ever. Upmost respect the service and sacrifice these sailors are giving.

  5. “…miles beneath the ocean’s surface.” Slight hyperbole for submarines (though not research vessels), at least w/ 2025 technology. Nevertheless, all honors should be duly accorded to those who have, are, and will serve in that capacity. Have to admit, the thought of serving inside a confined metallic tube beneath the ocean’s surface, never seemed to be even remotely appealing personally. Not even after drinking a pitcher of beer or margaritas.

  6. I am making a good s­al­ary from home $4580-$5240/week , which is amazing und­er a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now its my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone, Here is I started_______ ­W­w­w­.­­E­a­r­n­5­4­.C­O­M

  7. 201 days and still on patrol.
    174, 201,195, 154,165, 161 days for the previous 6 patrols.

    May I suggest to the Minister / Treasury Sir Humphrey that they go on the next patrol and when they come back explain to the Sailors, their families and this Nation why we don’t need a 5th Dreadnought ordering up. And that they take personal responsibility for any future issues !

    For once I ashamed to be British 😞

    • To be safe I’d double the order. The world is going off the rails atm, better to have them and not need them. Than to go without when we really do need them.

      • We can’t support / crew more than 5, just remember that’s 2 crews per boat. Besides which between us and the French we petty we’ll match Russia you can over do these things and I doubt the US would be able to supply more of one vital material than they are.

    • Don’t know where you got your figures Rodney but if true that sounds horrendous. I started in diesel boats and ended up in V boats. I did 8 patrols the longest of which was about 90 days and that was bad enough. I felt like a stranger coming home to my family because there’d been no communication between us all that time. How can they possibly retain volunteers for that sort of a life? I would feel that it was being stolen from me.

    • I thought patrols of this length would be finished with the return of Vanguard to the fleet. Given the high priority of CASD to the military, we need to do better by our submariners.

  8. Wearing my researcher hat, I’d be interested to know how that translates into rates of relationship breakdown, quality of close relationships with friends and family, well-being and mental health, fitness levels, and physical well-being. I’m sure these are all known but probably not shared with the general public.

  9. As an ex (Resolution class) submariner, thank you for writing this superb piece of journalism. Greatly appreciated.

  10. Denis Healy cancelled the 5th R boat in the late 60s , the V boats were expected to have a much higher availability that we could deploy 2 V boats on patrol 75% of the time , this was never achieved, the delay to the decision to procure the Dreadnought class has meant the V boats have been in service longer than anticipated, the delays in Barrow on A class build and with Babcock on in service maintenance has meant we will not fully recover for some time yet , the burden of these issues will fall on our submariners

  11. My concern is for the Tridents, which we lease from
    the Americans, albeit with our own warheads.
    With the US now going through a period of unreliability,
    perhaps the time has come to joint-venture with our
    French allies, who have their own fully developed
    and in-service sub launched ICBMs.

  12. The Americans have proved themselves selfish and unreliable. Led by a man with the morals of a Junkyard Dog. It is time to be fully independent of the US. We share a common language, but they are not our friends anymore. In fact, they seem to have more in common with the Russians now. To end a hundred year partnership with such a betrayal stinks, but that is the nature of the beast. We’ll just have to rely on our partners this side of the Atlantic.

  13. Beautifully written piece. Those that know the sacrifices of those brave men and women, truly know the meaning of serving one’s country.

  14. Imagine over 200 days away, getting excited about meeting the family and then you have to clean yourself and the boat for a photograph session and self promotion from a labour prime minister who under his old boss, supported by Starmer, would have scrapped the boats. I’m an ex submariner from conventional and nuclear boats; he would have got his horoscope read if he would have pulled that self indulged act with us.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here