Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told Parliament how the government will fund the £15bn Defence Investment Plan, reallocating capital budgets across Whitehall, with roads and energy spending among the areas reduced and £4.7bn still to be confirmed at the autumn Budget.

Opening her written statement with the line that “the first job of any government is to keep people safe,” Rachel Reeves confirmed the additional £15 billion for defence between 2026-27 and 2029-30, which she said would take the Ministry of Defence’s budget to almost £298 billion across the four years and amount to more than £60 billion more on defence over the period than under the previous government’s plans, framing the increase as proof that national security is “central to our economic security.”

The Chancellor said the package amounted to “more money for UK defence, spent more effectively,” and that it had been funded by reprioritising public spending within the government’s fiscal rules and, she said, without taking resources from day-to-day spending on frontline services, drawing primarily on a reallocation of capital budgets from across government departments.

Of the total, £10.3 billion has been identified now, with a further £4.7 billion to be confirmed at the autumn Budget, and the Treasury said departments would look for efficiencies, cancel or delay lower-priority programmes and sell off underused land and buildings, while remaining, in the Chancellor’s words, “ruthlessly focussed on value for money for the taxpayer.”

Two departments with large capital budgets have been asked to contribute the most, with the Department for Transport providing up to £700 million of savings from roads funding and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero finding a further £2 billion, which the government said it would deliver while continuing to “protect the clean power mission” and to fund renewable and nuclear construction. A one per cent reduction in departmental capital budgets across Whitehall accounts for a further £4 billion of the package over the four years.

Alongside those savings, the government said £3.4 billion of additional spending power had been generated by removing burdens from the defence budget, including the Treasury taking on £2.4 billion of costs for ongoing international commitments such as Ukraine security guarantees in the event of a ceasefire, together with income from rationalising the Ministry of Defence estate and from the department reprioritising its own spending. Taken with £11.6 billion of new cash, the Treasury said, this brought the total to £15 billion.

The statement set out what the money would buy, restating the headline commitments in the plan, among them more than £5 billion for drones and autonomous systems, £8.6 billion for the Global Combat Air Programme with Italy and Japan, £11 billion for munitions and at least six new energetics factories, £3.2 billion for space and £64 billion for renewing the nuclear deterrent.

The government said the investment would take Britain to 2.7% of GDP on core NATO defence spending from 2027-28.

The Chancellor also announced what she described as a reset of financial management at the Ministry of Defence, with budget-holders made accountable to the department’s permanent secretary, a commitment to recover £250 million of fraud by the end of the decade and annual updates to Parliament on how the plan is being delivered. Reeves said the government was “committed to fiscal sustainability” and acting within its “iron-clad fiscal rules,” and with £4.7 billion of the funding still to be confirmed at the Budget and the steeper climb towards 3.5% of GDP resting on decisions at a future spending review, the statement fixes the immediate four-year total while leaving some of the longer-term funding to be settled later, with NATO allies due to review the trajectory of their spending in 2029.

Tom Dunlop
Tom brings over thirteen years of experience in the defence sector, with deep expertise across both military and commercial maritime industries. His work has taken him across Europe and the Far East, and he is currently based in Scotland.

21 COMMENTS

  1. We need to stop talking about money & percentages. The only metric that matters is:

    Is our nuclear deterrent secure and working?
    Can we close the GIUK gap to Russia?
    Can we deploy a full armoured division to eastern Europe?
    Is our air space secure & our aircraft able to support our allies?

    I suspect the answer to these questions is 0 out of 4.

    • The constant talk of a percentage of GDP is pointless as it always depends on what the GDP actually is. GDP flatlines, so does spending. Your other comments are spot on.

    • Percentage of GDP is the only way of comparing different sized economies military spending. Poland is spending ~ £36 billion on defence but that’s 4.8% of gdp.

  2. Here we go again with the under used land nonsense. The if the land was purchased under covenant in ww1 and ww2 that if would be offered to the original owner at market value. Crichel Down Rules also state that land compulsory purchased also has to be offered to the original owner at the market value for the original use of the land. The state won’t see any uplift in value. This comes around every 10 years or so and each government discovers why it hasn’t been sold for 80 years.

  3. So after all the turmoil they picked the middle options at £15 billion vs £12 or £18 billion.

    I bet Sir Kier wished he got here several months ago, might still have a job.

    The MoD has got a pretty decent settlement at the end of the day. If they don’t piss it up the wall they can do a lot with it, so far all the cut capabilities seem to be sensible. Just have to wait and see if there is anything bigger but I suspect we know most of it now.

    My only real disappointment is no ABM GBAD, Not enough F35A and as yet no more E7’s.

      • The forces housing cuts/delays just don’t make sense, recruitment and retention is already an issue, this was a major step forward to helping with the retention issue. If it was social housing they wouldn’t struggle to find the funding.

    • It’s still hard to see what has taken so long in producing this DIP, the majority of the stuff was in the works already, so many the key aspects were in the works prior to this government.
      I don’t think people would have seen it as particularly bad DIP if it had have come out 18 months ago near the start of labours term, to commit and order what conservatives had delayed, but two years after they entered power, over a year after the SDR it clearly doesn’t live upto and after a bunch of cuts which clearly aren’t being replaced it just makes it all a bit ridiculous, so much drama over so little, but that is the ruling class in general now, regardless of who people vote for.

    • I found this on page 45 “75. Next decade we will invest in additional aircraft to increase the mass of the RAF’s
      combat air force” Guessing more F35’s? then E7’s when they can free up more funds?

  4. ‘…the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero finding a further £2 billion’

    And there is plenty more where that came from!

    No excuse now for the defence funding shortfall…armed forces personnel paying the price in sub standard accommodation as usual.

    What an absolute disgrace!

    • Not while Miliband is there, for someone who never took Labour to win an election it’s crazy the power he has within the party, seemingly more power than the guy who actually brought the party back to power after 14 years.

  5. where we are today is unthinkable from only a few years ago, this all dates back to the US inspired ukraine revolution in 2014, massive mistake, millions will die unles the west finds a solution acceptable to russia

    • Re your ‘US inspired ukraine revolution in 2014’. There was no such thing Boris.
      I think millions will die unless the West stands up to Russia.
      I think this should mean the restoration of Ukraine’s 2014 borders and restoring democracy in Belarus (the current legitimate government is in exile in Lithuania).

  6. Two numbers to note: £11b to replace what we have gifted to Ukraine – ammunition I presume replacement army vehicles.
    Army numbers to be increased to 76,000

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here