Shipyards, including Ferguson Marine in Port Glasgow, have been contracted for steelwork fabrication for a limited number of units to support the delivery of the Type 26 programme.

The Type 26 frigate project is creating significant work opportunities across British shipyards.

On May 19, a tender was issued, signalling plans to award a £500,000 contract for the sea transport of blocks and units related to the Type 26 programme. The delivery contract is slated to begin in October 2023 and will continue until May 2024.

“BAEs Naval Ships are outsourcing a scope of steelwork fabrication to build yards across the UK. These will range from three single units to a consolidated block. Due to the size and weight of these, seaborne transportation will be required. BAEs Naval Ships are looking to hear from any transportation subcontractor’s that would be interested in undertaking this scope of work. The three single units will be transported to a quayside where they will then be required to be loaded out to a suitable vessel prior to onwards shipping to BAEs Naval Ship’s Govan site. The units will then be required to be discharged at the Govan site.

The consolidated block will be built in a number of build cradles. It will require transportation to the quayside via SPMTs. The block will be required to be loaded out to a suitably sized barge and then be secured for onwards transportation to BAEs Naval Ship’s Govan site. Upon arrival, the block will be required to be loaded in at Govan and transported to its final location within the yard.

The Supplier is to provide the assets, suitably qualified labour, supervision, inspection engineering and project management to undertake the transportation scope as detailed above. The supplier is expected to be able to work flexibly, proactively and innovatively, recognising opportunity to improve efficiency and re-prioritise where appropriate. This includes particularly close working with a number of stakeholders.”

The tender announcement revealed that BAE Systems is engaging several local shipyards for steelwork fabrication. The work parcels range from constructing three individual units to a consolidated block. Due to the sheer size and weight of these fabricated sections, transportation to the Govan site is only possible via sea routes.

Below is an image of a section being delivered from the Tyne via ‘crane ship’.

BAE Systems told me:

“We have outsourced steelwork fabrication for a limited number of units to support delivery of the Type 26 programme. While the majority of the steelwork is manufactured in Glasgow, in this instance A&P Group and Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd have been contracted to supply a total of seven units. This is typical for a programme of this scale and offers an opportunity for UK companies to play their part on this national endeavour.

For transportation, the successful bidder will provide seaborne transportation services to carry these units to Govan, Glasgow. The tender will also give us competitive pricing detail for any future shipping transportation contracts required to support the programme, and ensure we continue to deliver value for money.”

You can read more about the work being done by other shipyards here.

Ferguson yard starts work on sections of Type 26 Frigate

 

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

30 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

maurice10
maurice10 (@guest_733578)
10 months ago

I think it’s called the snowball effect. Certainly very good news for UK shipbuilding. I do hope the SNP embrace just how beneficial this business is for Scotland’s economy.

Patrick
Patrick (@guest_733580)
10 months ago
Reply to  maurice10

With any luck the SNP are consigned to the political dustbin after all their scandals.

Jim
Jim (@guest_733595)
10 months ago
Reply to  maurice10

No one gives a crap about the SNP anymore. Everyone has realised just how full of shit they are, it is a Scottish version of the Tory’s and Brexit, hopefully all coming to and end soon.

maurice10
maurice10 (@guest_733637)
10 months ago
Reply to  Jim

Come on Jim, it’s wishful thinking to think the SNP is much diminished. It will still hold a significant number of votes at the next general election and the indy is only delayed not consigned to the bin. I’d like to see a spiritual reunification between all UK nations, which has been somewhat torn apart by politics in recent decades.

James
James (@guest_733809)
10 months ago
Reply to  Jim

Lol yeah great get Labour back in and re-join the EU, great idea.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_733587)
10 months ago

Love to see a 9th T26 while good value at sub £1bn and strengthen RN’s ASW further. Still lots of money but it wouldn’t be wasted. Rule of 3, 6 can be out and about at a pinch. More availability for CSG too. And an extra full fat T31!

Last edited 10 months ago by Quentin D63
Paul Bestwick
Paul Bestwick (@guest_733592)
10 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Quentin agreed, I would like and additional T-31 for the same reasons. The next thing then would be plans to restructure of the frigate refit facility at Devonport to be able to accommodate the new larger frigates.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_733605)
10 months ago
Reply to  Paul Bestwick

Hi Paul, yes, an incremental increase up to 20-24 and then if the 6*T32s ever come the RN might even get to 30. Here’s hoping!

Challenger
Challenger (@guest_733604)
10 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

The latter point of the Future Surface Combatant plan calling for 10 C1 high-end ‘full fat’ frigates, 8 C2 simpler ‘patrol frigates’ and a dozen or more C3 corvette sized vessels to replace the OPV, MCM and survey fleets was very suited to the Royal Navy’s needs until the 2010 SDSR and subsequent austerity utterly butched any long-term plans.

I’d still happily take 10 T26 and 8 T31 instead of pursuing whatever the T32 becomes as a resurrected form of the above.

Bulkhead
Bulkhead (@guest_733606)
10 months ago
Reply to  Challenger

🖕

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_733609)
10 months ago
Reply to  Challenger

A dozen corvettes! Is that still the thinking?

Ron
Ron (@guest_733622)
10 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Not sure if it is still in the pipeline but why not. I was looking at the South African Valour Class light frigate/corvettes based on the MEKO A200. A reasonable ship, well kitted out and cost about £120 million each in 2006. Which could be a good option for UK home waters, Baltic and Med operations. Trans Atlantic convoys escort would also be a good tasking for this type of ship. This would free up the T26s/T45s to carry out blue water operations which is what they are designed for.

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_733722)
10 months ago
Reply to  Ron

Agree with a lot of that. I see the Valour is described variously as a multi- purpose light frigate or as a small guided missile frigate. I wonder if something like it wasn’t considered for T31. I’m not sure the RN does green water ‘ light ( 3750 tons 120m ) multi-purpose’ frigates. It chose the Arrowhead 140 – blue water, nigh on 6000 tons, global, GP now to have Mk41 vls. Also T31 crew requirement looks to be about 1/3rd less than Valour. As things have turned out the 12 corvettes idea has become 3 River batch 1 fisheries… Read more »

Ron
Ron (@guest_733739)
10 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Totally agree and that is the issue. Th UK does not do Green Water operations but uses high end blue water ships for green and brown water ops. An example is a T45 going to the Caribbean for anti piracy patrols. I like the Batch 2 OPVs, I just wish that they would have a containerised RUAV, possibly two RUAVs. Very useful vessels for policing duties in the Caribbean, Pacific Islands etc. The Batch 1 ships are good in the Fisheries role. However the T26 does confuse me, its main task is ASW; yet they are to escort the carriers… Read more »

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_733748)
10 months ago
Reply to  Ron

Agree, but this does mean that T32 is more like Arrowhead 120 than Arrowhead 140. I wonder if that’s why BAe proposed the 117m stretched River hull Leander for T31. While a larger fleet is the longterm solution we do need to do something in the short term. I agree we should look at getting more out of River 2; and the just laid up Echo and Enterprise; and the Waves. For example; how much effort would it be to convert a couple River 2s to corvettes to do T23 GP duties? Add a 40mm gun, a telescopic hangar, containers,… Read more »

Challenger
Challenger (@guest_733693)
10 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

No, i was referring to pre 2010 when it was envisioned that the OPV, MCM and survey fleets could be replaced with a class of 2-3,000 ton vessels using modular payloads of autonomous kit. It sort of morphed into to the MHPC (mine hunter patrol capability) study but never really went anywhere due to dithering, a lack of funds and then the picture being fudged by ordering the batch 2 River’s The current plan is to procure a hodgepodge of 4-5 commercial vessels to act at MCM mother-ships. The future of hydrographic survey is still very much up in the… Read more »

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_733733)
10 months ago
Reply to  Challenger

Right, thx for the MHPC reminder. I had forgotten that.

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_736896)
10 months ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Weren’t the Archers meant to attract undergraduates into the RN…University naval squadrons or something? Teach basic seamanship skills? I think a couple of them are used for force protection in Faslane.

Robert Billington
Robert Billington (@guest_733793)
10 months ago
Reply to  Challenger

Did you not read the subcommittee minutes?? The Navy has been stealing money from the other services to pay for budget overspend!!

maurice10
maurice10 (@guest_733641)
10 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63
  • An increase is possible one would think, however, if the RN were to be offered say, ten T83s I doubt we would see more T26s. Why do I think we may get ten T83s? My thoughts are based on the admission that more T45s should have been built and in hindsight having more hulls would have allowed more flexibility during the type’s engine upgrades.
Frost002
Frost002 (@guest_733625)
10 months ago

what goes up…..

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_733627)
10 months ago

T-26 program(me) apparently progressing well, but privately wish the programme had been authorized earlier and had progressed further and faster, in order that it could have qualified participated in the USN FFG selection competition. Can’t prove this, but believe full and open completion tends to improve/sharpen everyone’s game, via the ‘invisible hand’ postulated by A. Smith. Oh well…🙃

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_733628)
10 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

… qualified to participate…🙄

Clive Cartey
Clive Cartey (@guest_733629)
10 months ago

Crumbs from the Scottish ship building table of plenty for an English shipyard.

Peter Crisp
Peter Crisp (@guest_733631)
10 months ago

This may be a stupid question but why aren’t we seeing more catamaran and trimaran ships?

I thought they were supposed to have loads of advantages? I know the US has had to scrap the freedom class due to them being a bit pants but is the entire idea for 2 and 3 hulled warships dead?

They look so cool which I realise isn’t a great reason to choose a design of warship.

Paul T
Paul T (@guest_733646)
10 months ago
Reply to  Peter Crisp

You’ve answered your own question 🙄

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_733651)
10 months ago
Reply to  Peter Crisp

There were loads of arguments in 80’s and 90’s about short fat and long thin.

Basically it was to do with stability for gunfire and radars.

That is not very important now that naval radars can digitally correct, in real time, for pitch and yaw. Likewise gun servo mounts have moved a long way from hydraulic compensators on large guns and basic gyro on small guns. Gyro still has a place.

Missile systems no longer beam ride or have ship mounted directors so that requirement has fallen away.

Also catamarans and trimarans are dreadful in high sea states.

Peter Crisp
Peter Crisp (@guest_733658)
10 months ago

Thanks for the great explanation :-).

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_733661)
10 months ago
Reply to  Peter Crisp

Pleasure

Robert Billington
Robert Billington (@guest_733792)
10 months ago

None of this matters if the powers that be cannot reform procurement and get the Navy to quit taking the proverbial with budgets.
As mentioned in the recent subcommittee minutes!!
That James Cartlidge sounds like a total idiot