British, American, and Australian air crews have participated in Exercise Bamboo Eagle 24-3, a multinational training event designed to enhance cooperation and operational readiness in preparation for potential high-end conflict.

The exercise integrated airmen from the Royal Air Force (RAF), U.S. Air Force, and Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) in a series of live, virtual, and constructive operations conducted in the eastern Pacific.

Exercise Bamboo Eagle focused on Agile Combat Employment (ACE) concepts, where forces from all three nations operated across multiple locations under a centralised command and control (C2) structure. The exercise aimed to address various operational challenges, including distributed command and control, communication, logistics, and sustainment, simulating scenarios that could arise in future conflicts.

According to Lt. Col. Michael Power of the U.S. Air Force, the exercise covered a large synthetic battlespace of more than 850,000 square miles, offering a unique training environment. He noted, “The exercise prepares both tactical and operational warfighters for competition.” This iteration also introduced the deployment of a fully resourced Air Operations Centre (AOC), adding an operational-level dimension to the training.

RAF Wing Commander Richard Kinniburgh highlighted the level of integration between the participating forces, saying, “Our partners were able to lead AOC shifts and fill key leadership roles.” RAAF Squadron Leader Sean Bedford also commented on the cooperation, stating, “The opportunity to integrate into the U.S. AOC was a valuable aspect of the exercise.”

Exercise Bamboo Eagle provided opportunities for personnel from the UK, US, and Australia to train together, further developing their collective operational capabilities and strengthening cooperation across air forces, all with an eye on future readiness for potential conflict scenarios.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_855841)
17 days ago

So, we are still training with allies for conflict outside the NATO area. I wonder if that will change when SDR is published? HMG is so focussed on NATO you sometimes wonder if they still want to do Global Britain, militarily.

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_855853)
17 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Morning Graham it really is baffling 🙄

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_855932)
16 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

It’s very much a question of priority I suppose, where are we most likely to wind up in a conflict next? To be fair to NATO, the area of influence covers our back yard, all the way down from the arctic ice, and all the way down and round to the Suez canal, essentially. That covers a number of our national interests- both military and otherwise, non-NATO security commitments, etc. I can understand why we may prioritise it. But I think the whole AUKUS thing does underline how we view our partnerships in that part of the world- even if… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_856021)
16 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

To be honest Graham, there would be a pretty good chance that any sino/US war would end up a NATO conflict anyway..infact I would say it would be almost inevitable. The U.S. would have to strike mainland china to have a hope of winning any campaign in the china seas and china would probably then strike back. Also it’s whole warfighting doctrine is about linking political warfare with making a population and body politic suffer until they come to the peace table..( very different to the western paradigm, which is about defeating an nations militarily infrastructure). So I would give… Read more »

Last edited 16 days ago by Jonathan
Nevis
Nevis (@guest_856054)
16 days ago
Reply to  Jonathan

I think you’re overestimating China’s abilities. What will China attack the continental US with? How will they get there? They are half the world apart. And the US controls everything in between. China might be a beast in its own backyard but it’s no superpower. It doesn’t have the experience or assets to attack any NATO territory to trigger article 5 and even if it did it would be the stupidest thing it could do.

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_856069)
16 days ago
Reply to  Nevis

China will not go to war with The US – they are to smart for that. On current force levels they’d loose badly – considering the abundance of natural US allies . China would be overwhelmed and they know it.

Their strategy remains timeless throughout the ages. double downed by the politburo “let our enemies destroy themselves from within”.

Nevis
Nevis (@guest_856231)
15 days ago
Reply to  Klonkie

China won’t go to war with the US but it might not have a choice if it invades Taiwan. Any potential conflict will only ever be in Chinas backyard. It’s not just the allies. The US has the industrial base, it has a nearly a century of naval warfare experience and especially carrier operations under its belt. For China to get what it wants and take Taiwan it will have to take a beating. That might be acceptable for Xi. Losses of half a million to a million Chinese personnel for 10-15 thousand US personnel would probably be acceptable to… Read more »

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_856359)
15 days ago
Reply to  Nevis

Thank you Nevis, some valid good points you raise here.

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_856072)
16 days ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Hi Jonathan China will not deliberately go to war with The US – they are to smart for that. On current force levels they’d loose badly – considering the abundance of natural US allies (re your comment on triggering article 5). I think it’s likely well see AUKUS expand to include Japan and S.Korea maybe India, China is a big concern here in the Antipodes and it seems AUKUS has universal political support across the spectrum. China would be overwhelmed and they know it I recall your piece on a possible Taiwan invasion which was petty much spot on IMO.… Read more »

Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_856177)
15 days ago
Reply to  Klonkie

The CCP strategy of mercantile dominance is effective in hollowing out national capabilities which were required to defeat the enemy in WW2 so a deliberate preparation for WW3. That’s a long term plan and economic warfare enabled by those who follow the money with no regard for the big picture. Literally the weakness of capitalism. The RF has no such insight or competence so is very much the junior in the unlimited friendship. However they both agree that Democracy is weak to misinformation so fund the FSB kompromat operations to mislead voters about their national interest on all available channels.… Read more »

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_856358)
15 days ago
Reply to  Lonpfrb

Thanks Mate , that was an insightful and interesting read – good post!

Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_856559)
14 days ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Thank you. I’m often informed and entertained by your posts.

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_855976)
16 days ago

Excellent. Apart from the fact that UK forces are about as far as possible from being prepared for a prolonged high end war, even as a minor ally. Far too small for benign peace, let alone supporting the US, Aus & friends in the Far East. Though I think it is very much in our interests to support them & help Taiwan deter/defeat a CCP invasion.

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_856068)
16 days ago

Hhhm. I note my country (NZ) is not participating?

Mickey
Mickey (@guest_856122)
16 days ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Nor is Canada. Although the RCAF operates in the pacific and has constant involvement with the RAF, USAF, RAAF and the RNZAF.

Last edited 16 days ago by Mickey
Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_856181)
15 days ago
Reply to  Mickey

Hopefully this is just part of a journey to build the exercise out to all the stakeholders over time, whilst learning the lessons.

I suspect that like Red Flag there are capacity and capability constraints so it will take time to build.

Mickey
Mickey (@guest_856197)
15 days ago
Reply to  Lonpfrb

I am sure it is. Canada’s modernization of its fighter force and maritime patrol wing with F35 and P-8s are coming soon.

Zephyr
Zephyr (@guest_857151)
12 days ago
Reply to  Mickey

Have they announced anything yet? I was pleased to see there are new frigates on the horizon (hopefully they follow through). New aircraft would be great.

Mickey
Mickey (@guest_857210)
11 days ago
Reply to  Zephyr

Yes, F35s should start arriving in 3 years and the P8s around the same time.