The UXV Combatant was designed by BVT Surface Fleet and displayed at the Defence Security and Equipment International event in 2007, would it have been a good investment?

Designed to “launch, operate and recover large numbers of small unmanned vehicles for extended periods, the UXV plays the role of mother ship – a permanent base and control centre for the futuristic unmanned land, sea and air vehicles before, during and on completion of their missions“.

The UXV Combatant featured two flight decks for launching unmanned aerial vehicles, V/STOL aircraft, and helicopters; arrayed in a “V” shape.

The UXV would have packed enough heat to give all these assets cover. On the foredeck, missile batteries could house both surface-to-air and ship-to-ship missiles and cruise missiles. A large-calibre gun that fires six-inch munitions, 20 rounds at a time, provides incredible power for ship-to-ship fighting and for strafing a variety of targets onshore.

When plans for the UXV hit the web in 2007, some commentators sniped that the ship was destined to be the warship of a robot uprising. But that’s unlikely. As with today’s “drones” (remotely piloted air systems), most of the aircraft on the UXV would be controlled by remote human operators.

According to a press release at the time:

“Each flight deck is approximately 164 feet (50 m) in length. To launch aircraft, UXV Combatant could be expected to use the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System or a ski-jump.

UXV Combatant is also reported to be capable of launching unmanned underwater vehicles via a “moon pool”, and in addition, able to embark a large number of troops plus their equipment.

For naval gunfire support, UXV Combatant is equipped with a 155 mm cannon, able to fire bursts of 20 rounds in rapid succession.”

Tom has spent the last 13 years working in the defence industry, specifically military and commercial shipbuilding. His work has taken him around Europe and the Far East, he is currently based in Scotland.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tim62
Tim62 (@guest_382832)
6 years ago

Well it still looks fantastic to me, even though I know we’re never going to build it!

steven kirkland
steven kirkland (@guest_382835)
6 years ago

This is just cock teasing now

Great concept and design and soon to be seen within the US Navy no doubt

John Pattullo
John Pattullo (@guest_382842)
6 years ago

i accept they could launch fixed wing aircraft with a catapult – but how are they going to get them back on deck?

Ben P
Ben P (@guest_382860)
6 years ago
Reply to  John Pattullo

By landing with a hook. Just like the current US carriers.

John Pattullo
John Pattullo (@guest_382861)
6 years ago
Reply to  Ben P

and if they miss? not enough space to do a touch and go – there is a reason carriers are the size they are

Steven
Steven (@guest_382873)
6 years ago
Reply to  John Pattullo

Simple, the incoming aircraft are caught by a tractor beam, then slowly guided down to the desired landing zone. The beam is powerful enough to hold the aircraft mid-air if neccessary. This is deffo real, it is made the same same team behind the MIG-41, as we all know that beastie can travel at Mach 8-10 aswell as into space 🙂

Stuart Willard
Stuart Willard (@guest_382893)
6 years ago
Reply to  John Pattullo

It does say V/STOL aircraft.

Rover10
Rover10 (@guest_383062)
6 years ago
Reply to  Stuart Willard

For drones to be truly effective they should all be V/STOL as that is real future for most naval air operations, combat or otherwise.

Andrew Wood
Andrew Wood (@guest_382849)
6 years ago

Clearly this would have been a good idea to have this type of ship, that could defend itself without the need to have a frigate as part of its defence. Plus with the current situation of decommissioning HMS Ocean soon. As this vessel would have had an LPD capability.

A. Smith
A. Smith (@guest_382887)
6 years ago

I mentioned the UVX about a month or so ago in these forums and think the concept is worth revisiting but based on a Type 26 hull.

Shame it will never get built though.

Mike
Mike (@guest_382889)
6 years ago

Looks like a pile of impractical rubbish

KieranC
KieranC (@guest_382996)
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Are you Mike Saul in disguise? ?

Secundius
Secundius (@guest_382905)
6 years ago

Yeeeeaaaaaaaahh?/! I’m not holding my breath, on the Future of THIS Concept either…

Steve R
Steve R (@guest_382909)
6 years ago

Was Gerry Anderson the designer? Could very well be Thunderbird 6! Or add some flip out fans and it could fly, get Marvels Avengers on board.

Julian
Julian (@guest_382966)
6 years ago
Reply to  Steve R

It reminded me of Captain Scarlet’s Cloudbase (also Gerry Anderson so your point is well made). Probably more of a match for the Mysterons than a core T31.

Bloke down the pub
Bloke down the pub (@guest_382962)
6 years ago

A while back, the press got all excited about a ‘new Chinese aircraft carrier’, but in reality, it was just a paper exercise in what ifs and had no more likelihood of being built than the UXV.

Andy
Andy (@guest_382963)
6 years ago

@Steve R – Thunderbird 6 was a vintage Tiger Moth, as featured in the first Thunderbirds film

Lewis
Lewis (@guest_382988)
6 years ago

It would be incredible for special operations. Hilcopters to insert in, unmanned drones for air support and the moon pool for aquatic operations. Even a main gun for artIlley support if the op is near the shore. Sadly a dream never to be realised. The UK is incredible with inventing these kind of things but then when money gets tight, things fall by the wayside and counties willing to pay take the lead. Something that inevitably comes back to bite us in the next war.

Gerard
Gerard (@guest_383106)
6 years ago

Maybe get more the U(C)AVs programs on order/long term footing Tyranis follow-up, all Protectors on option, Mantis(?) etc before we look at/design/order 6+ 1bn+ ships for them to fly off.

Hate to end up with a situation of a large flight deck and pretending we totally were only ever going to run it with one maybe two helicopters.

Mistaking a slideshow full of lasers, rail guns and mind control for actual planning hasn’t done the services any favours for the last 20 years.