Is the Russian Air Force incapable of complex air operations? That is the question being asked by Justin Bronk, Research Fellow for Airpower and Technology in the Military Sciences team at RUSI.

Bronk points out that more than a week into the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Air Force has yet to commence large-scale operations.

“Inactivity in the first few days could be ascribed to various factors, but the continued absence of major air operations now raises serious capability questions.”

A possible reason Bronk argues is that while the early Russian failure to establish air superiority could be explained by lack of early warning, coordination capacity and sufficient planning time, the continued pattern of activity suggests a more significant conclusion:

“That the VKS lacks the institutional capacity to plan, brief and fly complex air operations at scale. There is significant circumstantial evidence to support this, admittedly tentative, explanation.”

You can read more from Justin Bronk here, I recommend you do so as it’s a very informative article.

The British Ministry of Defence has advised that Russia is now attempting to limit their losses by flying at night.

Russia fails to gain air superiority over Ukraine

You can read more on this here.

Tom has spent the last 13 years working in the defence industry, specifically military and commercial shipbuilding. His work has taken him around Europe and the Far East, he is currently based in Scotland.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

301 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew
Andrew
2 years ago

Interesting article…. Makes you wonder just how big is the quality/training gap between a western and Russian pilot.

Callum
Callum
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

It would go a long way to explaining how they can afford such an apparently powerful military with a relatively weak economy.

A pretty large chunk of Western budgets is training, if the Russians are skipping that it would save large chunk of cash.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Callum

Just look at much of European NATO, lots of manpower even vehicles and little capability to deploy even in own country. Look how bad things are for Germany especially now try and imagine that spread across a force as large as the Russians with a leader who does not accept bad news and wants to spend money on building Death Stars. Those European NATO members get to train with the best and get advised as well. No one to advise the Russians and the Chinese are even worse.

Red Hanrahan
Red Hanrahan
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

I remember reading somewhere that Russian pilots can get as little as 100 flight hours a year. Not only that but Russia has a far more limited capacity for complex training scenarios, and they have nothing that comes close to the large scale air training exercises like Red Flag.

Johnathan Galt
Johnathan Galt
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

In many ways this sounds no different than the intel we received in the ’80s about the Soviet Union. I think your points are valid, and I would add that there may literally be schisms within the Russian government and military allowing some Generals to simply slow-walk their engagement in the war, or even flat out veto Putin’s orders.

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor
2 years ago

Often the simple answer is less complex. Maybe the pilots don’t want to fly against Ukrain! Think about it, Russia, like every other nation does not have a super abundance of pilots and therefore is not in a position to ignore them.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  OkamsRazor

Possibly. I’m assuming we have messed up GLONASS for them and probably a few other critical systems just output garbage. With that sort of thing going on the newer generation planes probably can’t be used. So all they are left with is the old stuff. Defensive aids don’t appear to work well or at all. So neither the pilots will be enthusiastic nor the Russian Air Force to loose even more jets. I do also think corruption plays here as some upgrades that should have been done haven’t been done and spares/maintenance/training money will have been trousered. So whilst neither… Read more »

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

Flying out of the range of MANPADs can be no protection either. There are many Buk and Tor systems, which are deadly, operating on the hide/fire/scoot/hide repeat principle that are very difficult to counter. A lesson we all hope that NATO is learning.

Pete
Pete
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Any chance the airforce maintenance teams are just as bad as the Army ones Johnin

https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1499763286392385541?t=ebXONjcm521N1oFWg-wpBA&s=07

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Pete

That reminds me of the Russian navy’s failure to rescue the surviving crew members of the Kursk. They’d not maintained the rescue submersible with the result it couldn’t get a seal on the Kursk.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Pete

Not if their work in 2015 in Syria is anything to go by.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

2015 Syria, kill civvies, carpet bomb and not fight a peer organisation. Ukraine isnt even peer and yet your Russkie blokes are getting wasted every day.

pete
pete
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

presumably the planes that reached Syria were those that could actually fly and a bit different with clear blue skies and laser designation from higher altitude against Toyota pick up trucks and 50cal. Good luck John. One missile hits a polish airbase and the Russian air force is gone.

George Kamburoff
George Kamburoff
2 years ago
Reply to  Pete

Yeah, but he has “hypersonic” missiles he dare not use.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

I do mn’t think we will worry too much about BUK or TOR given the way the rest of the Russian kit has worked Johnski.

BUK is so massive you could track it from the moon.

No we won’t worry about the Russian carpski technology – let’s be honest if the Russians were so stupid as to switch a BUK on and point it at a NATO plane they would rapidly discover what fast and accurate missiles look like.

Let’s be honest a BUK radar is just a good aiming point.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

Thanks Bloke. However, I don’t think the Russians consider they need their air force for this. They have brought up artillery to within range and will now pound the cities into submission.

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Afternoon, Barry just read your post on how The Ruskies and their use of Artillery the Ukrainians reply is that they SF will terminate any member of Artillery units that they come across for their indiscriminate shelling of Civilians , Putin will probably Cry Warcrimes I say if your Appliance gives you a shock Pull the Plug,,So tòo Speak

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Tommo

Good afternoon Tommo. It’s right bl**dy mess, isn’t it? Having to watch people with children dodging mortars in their own backyards and so on. I just hope people don’t forget but I place no credence at all in so-called international opinion. It’s worthless.

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

That’s the problem with war it’s not the fighting man that suffers the most and unfortunately this won’t be the last as plato stated 2000 yrs ago ” Only the Dead have seen the end of war” it would seem that still rings true in this case its again Civilians taking it the most as they are the easiest targets they don’t fire back Barry

justavet
justavet
2 years ago
Reply to  Tommo

I will take exception to your statement, “it’s not the fighting man that suffers.” Have you ever been “a fighting man?”

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  justavet

I was 22yr Royal Navy

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  Tommo

And what I meant in the above post was that the Fighting man (Soldiers) are trained in combat ,Civilians on the other hand have no concept of it Soldiers suffer but later when it’s over and mental health sets in I do know I took part in Corporate

Rory Berger
Rory Berger
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

I just crossed Ukraine from Dnipro and the Russians are losing ground in most Oblasts. Only Kherson has been taken and they lost a second general yesterday. The artillery has to get so close as to be at risk of attack by ground forces which have been decimating the Russians. 60k expats have joined the ranks of the Ukrainian military and 12k more stingers are enroute. Russia is already backtracking on their demands of demilitarization to try and save face. 95 percent of their initial invasion force is in the country and they have lost thousands of soldiers and their… Read more »

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Rory Berger

Many thanks Rory. My fear is Putin will go after large population centres – this has begun but could be much worse. The Ukrainians have enormous spirit but they have to fight within their own kith and kin dying around them. I know Finland (northern wastes) and Finnmark, Norway, quite well. Seeing how badly this Russian assault is proceeding the Finns in particular would take care of themselves well enough. If we can’t put main strength forces into Ukraine then I hope some major physical demonstration of will power by all countries bounding Russia comes about very soon.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

That’s not the point I was trying to make. NATO needs lots of systems like the Buk/Tor etc to defend itself, systems it has very few of as it seems to think all its needs is wizz bang fighters, not mucky things on the ground.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Oh you mean system like Patriot, THAAD & Sky Sabre? I’m sorry I forgot the names of the equivalent French and Italian systems. We do have this system called Sylver/Astor that is rather good too. But don’t worry Johnski out Typhoons are very good at A2A warfare and NATO has a lot of those that actually fly and things. Then we have F35 in increasing numbers. There is all the US kit like F16 and F18 that is more than pretty good. But you know all that sat in Milton Jeynesski? Do you get a dustpan and brush free when… Read more »

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

It’s MK as in Magnitogorsk, an industrial city in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia, located on the eastern side of the extreme southern extent of the Ural Mountains by the Ural River. 

Mind you Milton Keynes is terrifying!

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

It is if you don’t enjoy the traffic light Grand Prix. I have an Audi S3 which is normally pretty much a winner but there is stiff competition from staff at Mercedes and VW Group (both have UK HQ down the road from me) on their car schemes not averse to hammering their new cars, so I avoid them.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

😂👍!

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

No fully mobile systems like the Buk, Tor and Pantsir, proper anti CAS weapons.

WIGuy
WIGuy
2 years ago

Another thing, with the F-18s, they would never roll solo into contested airspace. They would roll with EA-18Gs and/or F-35Cs conducting electronic attack. Superhornet/Growler combo is very effective.

Equipment isn’t as important as how you use it (as the Russians and their inability to control air assets).

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

A few wizz bang fighters would be enough to sort out the half trained flying fuckwits of the RuAF who get around 100 hrs per year flying a bucket of rust.

G Hanson
G Hanson
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Israeli Mini Harpy drone seems to counter Russian AAM systems quiet nicely

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yeah right 😂

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Buk and Tor systems do not seem to be even affective against cheap Turkey drones , I know your access to twitter is limited Ivan , but the gap between your comments and reality is growing wider and wider lol.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

Not sure what point you are trying to make. The Russians use Pantsir against drones. No problem with Twitter over my 200Mb fiber here in MK.

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yaaaawn!

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn…..

Sean
Sean
2 years ago

Just as we seen in sport ‘incremental improvements’ in lots of areas can have large results, so in the Russian military it seems we are seeing ‘incremental degradation’. Lots of failings in many areas accumulating to result in poor performance.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

I like the reverse thinking of ‘marginal gains’.

There is truth to that in marginal degradations are more than the sum.

Which is why it is so important to train the boys and girls to get 100% out of the NATO kit.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

I.m not sure that advancing 25+ miles a day in many areas can be regarded as poor performance.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

It is when it’s only for two days while taking heavy losses you never expected and then running out of food and fuel, IvaninNKVD

Last edited 2 years ago by Sean
Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Well you have to set that against then suiting in a row.

On the bright side the Ukrainian have got plenty of static targets to try out their NLAW and JAVELIN tactics on for beginners.

My one concern is skills fade: the Ukrainians haven’t had to try and hit moving target for over a week? What if they forget how do do it?

Sean
Sean
2 years ago

Why bother if it’s stuck, not going anywhere, and is not contributing to Russia’s offensive? At the moment it’s just wasting up resources; food and fuel for warmth.

I imagine the artillery flattening the residential areas of Ukrainian cities are a higher priority target for them. I’m sure that will help them keep their skill sharps and the Russian mobile crematoria busy.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

I was being a bit tongue in cheek.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

👍😂👍!

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Its shite, but you will never say that as your controller is checking your required posts. The world is now seeing how crap your military really is, as bad as the 80s! Now trolly boy, any condemnation of tiny dick Putin?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago

Could the capture of various Russian SAM systems also have had an impact? I’d read something somewhere concerning IFF compromised but did not really understand it.

Their air force seems to be suffering unsustainable losses, even for Russia.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago

Hi Daniele, Definately and a good point. The article referred above suggests that the Russian Air Force is not well trained or experienced in large scale coordinated operations and it is a well argued conclusion. However, if the Russian pilots are so poorly trained as has been suggested I’m sure they’ll be well aware of their short comings, certainly they will by now, they are not idiots. In those circumstances knowing the Ukrainians may be able to ‘read’ their approach using IFF can’t be good for morale. I did write quite a long explanation of how I think the Ukrainians… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Was that MoD? Thought it was some dafty Labour MP in the Commons.

Whatever, I agree. I’ve seen there is a widespread policy if not highlighting UKR positions on Twitter and elsewhere. Quite rightly.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago

And in an opposite vein, highlighting all things Russian.
Twitter footage showing varied civy trucks and coaches on railway flatbeds in Russia headed westward. Complete with white Z marks.

Wonder whether they’re either in total shit state logistics wise or this is trying to avoid TB2 attacks by using civilian vehicles for supply movements, much like their use of ambulances for moving ammunition.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

I thought it was the BBC that leaked the info about the bomb fuses, together with broadcasting the imminent attack on Goose Green.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

The B.B.C. broadcast what some berk in the M.o.D. leaked to them. “Look at me! I know stuff!’

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Just because some berk in the MoD told them doesn’t absolve the BBC from responsibility for broadcasting it to the world.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

My point. It was a joint enterprise. A fifteen year old could have pointed out that blunder.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Remember the MoD telling the Argentinians they were not fusing their bombs properly!”

I think it was the BBC that did that?

Well done for self editing. We all need to be careful what we say.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago

OK SB, the BBC reported it, accepted. However, that information could only have come from the MoD press people, especially the attack on Goose Green. The fact that nothing has been said by the MoD or any British government at the time or since speaks volumes. If the BBC had leaked information then I cannot for one moment see why the MoD did not come down hard on the BBC – makes no sense. I would also reiterate a point I made on another post recently. The BBC World Service was funded by Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1982 (the… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

I’d say you response was factually accurate TBH.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago

Thanks SB, I appreciate you saying.

Cheers CR

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Chariot rider ,close with that statement of the MOD informing the Argies, On the 24th May the BBCs Brian hanrahan told the Whole world about failure of long wind down arming instead of short wind down arming on the 25th His information was used and the Cov took it in the afternoon Hanrahan got a slapping by that evening in the wardroom Hermes

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Tommo

Yes, I don’t think it was MOD at all.

The problem started and finished on Hermes and was then broadcast by the BBC.

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago

👍

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago
Reply to  Tommo

Hi Tommo, Again who told Hanrahan? Who ever it was must have signed the Official Secrets Act so either they were authroised or broke the rules. The fact that no one was ‘dealt with’ on either the MoD / Services or the BBC suggests that there were serious issues on around the info war. Under sometimes contradictory pressures mistakes are made and my feeling is that Hanrahan was told something, that with hindsight, he should not have been given. Likewise, you can argue that he should not have published it, but as a journalist he was probably justified in thinking… Read more »

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Unfortunately Chatiotrider, from the 21st May in San Carlos, and shios around the sound at the entrance too SC waters were getting g hit no impact detonation, some went straight through Glasgow Antrim took one Frigates took em as well those that were embedded were dealt with by the Bomb teams of Pompey, and Plymouth Clearenc Divers ,One of them were filmed removing a 500lb by the embedded BBC teams they may of told them about the fusie hadn’t armed because of short flight time before impact meaning it had not enough springtime too arm maybe it was a case… Read more »

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

I thought that was some journo.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
2 years ago

“Their air force seems to be suffering unsustainable losses, even for Russia.”

Indeed, and fortunately so. I wonder if JohninMK agrees with me? Any sign of Ulya yet?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnuHo8_EQQI

Last edited 2 years ago by Nigel Collins
JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

No he doesn’t, they are a long way from that situation both in terms of hardware and pilots. As I understand it, Russians view death for their Motherland rather differently to UK military dying for the UK and have been dying regularly in large numbers for centuries. Whilst clearly tragedies at a personal level the families are now very well rewarded.

Posse Comitatus
Posse Comitatus
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

They’re not jihadis and they know they are not defending Russia. So far, their only competence has been in levelling civilian and residential areas. Just how are their families going to be rewarded ?? Extra potatoes?

Sean
Sean
2 years ago

Extra roubles? Though given a Russian rouble is only worth a halfpenny… 😏

Posse Comitatus
Posse Comitatus
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

A free virtual tour of Putins luxury yacht.
A signed copy of ‘A History of Russia ‘ by Vladimir Putin.
A scale model of Salisbury Cathedral (self build, some parts may be missing)
A free t shirt with the letter Z on it.
A free subscription to Russia Today TV.
24 stone bag of potatoes.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago

Might be struggling to come up with all the bags of spuds they’re going to have to give out… 😏

dave12
dave12
2 years ago

LOL excellent.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

Epic. Possibly true!

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago

brilliant PC- you made my day!😝

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

No T shirts left, just the Z!

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Yee Gods, either the level of knowledge around here is poor or you’re taking the p. You can’t be that stupid not to realise that any rouble/$ or£ exchange rate is virtually irrelevant to the man in the street in Moscow, just as the £’s value doesn’t matter that much to us, apart perhaps for petrol.

The families of Russian fallen get R1M + income +gratuity, which is much in line with AFPS here. To many recipients that is a life changing amount of money.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

You’re partly righty, seriously taking the piss out of Putin’s tin-pot little empire.

Wow a million roubles, I bet all the parents of young Russian conscripts are crossing their fingers their children come back in a urn so they can strike it rich…. (Or do they just throw away the ashes from Putin’s mobile crematorium trucks?)

And you clearly don’t live in the U.K. if you don’t think the value of GBP matters, given its international value affects the cost of everything we buy that’s imported 🤦🏻‍♂️

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

He is now hilarious isn’t he, works hard in his troll attempts to get top troll and his name in the hat for the monthly best troll award of 5 litres of 2 stroke and an extra bucket of genuine Russian potato’s!

Posse Comitatus
Posse Comitatus
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Top trolls get a scale model of the Kursk submarine, complete with bow section blown open and a few surviving sailors writing farewell letters to their families after realising that no one in the Russian navy gave a shit about them.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

Harsh……but accurate!

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Yawn, you are becoming like a broken record. You need to up your game. Try making relevant comments on the points I make.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

What black, round, 7 or 12” with a crack on it? Anyway you make no points just waffle Russkie propaganda. So here is the big question for all to see, you claim to be a 73 year old living in MK who’s father was in the RAF, fighter controller if memory serves. Ok, in that case, why won’t you condemn Putins illegal invasion of Ukraine, and condemn the actions of a badly trained military using dumb ordnance on civilian and none military targets? Just these two things for now will do, the rest you can try to justify to a… Read more »

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Of course it does just as when its weak our exports are cheaper relatively but we still get the same £ which is what we are interested in. I mentioned petrol as it is one of the few things that we buy regularily that the value of the £ feeds directly into.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

So you’re contradicting yourself now.
If GBP is weak imports are more expensive but we get more value from foreign investments. So the value dies matter. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Speak for yourself, I wouldn’t touch an ICE car, too low tech and polluting for my taste.

Meirion X
Meirion X
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Russia’s main exports(oil etc), are priced in US$ and received in US$ according to the market price in
$ at the time of sale.
Not in local currency!

Last edited 2 years ago by Meirion X
dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Ivan your knowledge seems come across as crazy pro Putin ramblings that really does not match reality and I know you fantasize about living in a free nation with a much much more higher living standard than Russia like the UK but you must come to terms with your bad situation in Russia and if things keep getting this bad you might be out of the Russian troll game for good or join the Russians fleeing to Finland I would keep your opinions to yourself there though buddy you might get lynched .

Last edited 2 years ago by dave12
JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

Like Airborne, you to are becoming like a broken record. You need to up your game. Try making relevant comments on the points I make for a start rather than spouting anti Russian propaganda.

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

The footage of Russian daily failure is so much and so consistent its hard to discount Ivan and what you fail to understand is that the world wide OSINT community keeping tabs on Russia every mess up it has overwhelmed you Russian trolls , burying your head in the sand and counter a argument with the usual BS just simply does not cut it any more.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

Remember the chuff he was waffling a few weeks ago in regard to Putin not going to invade and the West and NATO are causing it? It’s all there to read isn’t it in his past posts! He has nothing relevant or real to contribute and he doesn’t seem to like being trolled, oh dear how sad never mind 😂

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Yes mate but he has to earn his Russian troll bonus , half a cabbage and a scaled model of a LADA every 200 comments.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

The more he replies to my (irritating) posts the more mistakes he makes. Trolls don’t like getting trolled, he gets angry with me, try’s to be reasonable with others. Trolls like this at more than likely operating number of accounts, and seeing the number of posts and replies if not a bot then maybe a few trolls operating the same accounts etc. So obvious this one is a troll account, do you think they read what they say and read back historic posts? So obviously a troll but maybe he can’t click on to the stuff he posts but more… Read more »

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yaaaaaawn……I can guarantee a Russkie conscript doesnt get the same as my pension and lump sum troll boy. But then again a percentage of fuck all, for a Russkie is pretty much fuck all x 1. Keep posting troll as you are hilarious and have now become the comedy commentator.

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Hi A . Or as I see it- twice the square root of f**k all! I used to find his commentary a blend of entraining stupidity and annoyance, In truth he is now just boring!

I know this sounds terrible, but part of me is dead keen to see what a squadron of F35’s would do to that stalled 36km column of russkies. The cost of the dropped ordnance though is likely worth more than the sum total value of all that ex soviet junk in that column!

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Agreed mate, he was easily spotted as a troll, but we can live with the usual chuff! But once outed most change avatars etc (he probably has numerous accounts however). But now he has become a very sad excuse of an appeaser with no grip on reality. And a single Sqn of F35s, or even a western 4th gen would pretty much make Ukraine a no go area for air and ground forces mate methinks. Putin really has allowed the world to see what shit state his military is in, and now he will be on a back foot desperately… Read more »

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

stay well Mate- 😷

Expat
Expat
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

I’m not going to give you an economics lesson but of course currency value matters.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  Expat

His economic experience amounts to counting potatoes and stealing 2 stroke for his second hand generator!

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I got A level Economics so I know a little bit.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Now your on a role with your replies to people, any condemnation of Putins illegal invasion of Ukraine?

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Pretty sure it was officers and commissars threatening to shoot them that kept many poor soviet soldiers charging the Germans at Stalingrad, rather than love of motherland.

David Whitney
David Whitney
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

This is actually true. Stalin executed 300 Soviet Army generals in October 1941 and another hundred or so in the following year. The survivors got the message. Brutal? Yes. Effective? Oh, yes.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  David Whitney

Royal Navy achieved the same effect just by court-martialling and executing one of its Admirals. 🤷🏻‍♂️

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Yawn, I seem to remember that that was a while back. You might not have noticed but things have changed since then.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Nope, half trained conscripts being treated like shit and killed then, and half trained conscripts being treated like shit and killed now! Nope, no change!

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yeah you’re right, I don’t recall Stalin invading any peaceful democracies and dropping cluster bombs on feeing civilians. Then again maybe things haven’t changed, both Putin and Stalin both like wiping out large numbers of Ukrainians.

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

And also to pick up Rifles that had been dropped by the dead front line as the second wave didn’t have a weapon between them not Motherland ,Survivaland Not one step back as the NKVD won’t just shot you but your family will be off to the Gulag Sean

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yaaaaawn not quite, as most the Russkie blokes are conscripts and have no choice. You are so full of tripe that you are actualy fun to read and respond to as your a farcical commentator who is in the same bracket as Kim Jong whatever and the NK brainwashed head sheds.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

There are apparently no conscripts in Ukraine, only contract soldiers like I assume you were.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Now your replying, got your instructions and can’t handle troll finders? Ok any condemnation of Putins illegal invasion of Ukraine?

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

That’s not what the captured Russian conscripts say.
Not is it what the families of killed conscious say.

Surely it would be better if you said there were conscripts in Ukraine. Because if these are Putin’s professional soldiers then I’d hate to see how the conscripts would perform 😂

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Last thing I heard from her was how she was celebrating the “Independance” of Donbass & Putin invading on day 1.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Frank62

Probably got tired of reading the uneducated, propaganda rich environment around here.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yaaaaaaawn

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Unlike Russia and it’s state controlled media hey son?

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Well stop posting it then 🤷🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  Frank62

She claimed she had brothers in the VDV , I would of not been celebrating Independance” of Donbass & Putin invading on day 1. if I was in her shoes, especially after the hammering they have taken recently.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

“Had” probably being the operative tense now…

George
George
2 years ago

Hi Danielle,
Yes good points made! I would also add that operations in Syria with the blessing of Assad was one thing targeting civilians, it’s another facing a functional military with support from UK, US and others.
Cheers
George

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  George

And now Putin is looking to borrow some of Assads troops to Liberate the poor downtrodden Ukrainian people who have all suffered under the Neo Nazi Government Boy is Putin getting desperate So now he has Chechens and Syrians ,Both Muslins fighting in a Christian/Jewish Country That won’t bode well when Putins hauled in front of the War crime tribunal if he survives , George

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

Sad news today, Colonel Oleksandr Oksanchenko is dead. He was the Su-27 pilot that many of us would have enjoyed watching at air shows. His Su-27 was shot down near Kiev by a RuAF S-400 missile, fired from Belarus, at 150km range. He has been awarded a Hero of Ukraine medal. RIP.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

That was reported on 24th or 25th February.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

Needed rubbing in apparently.

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

I think you should be more worried Ivan of what Commanders the Russians have lost and everything else,,, like your passive aggressive approach there Ivan lol.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

If experience in Syria is anything to go by, arned forces like the Russians will always lose more senior officers than NATO countries as they operate further forward than ours do.

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

LOL absolute Rubbish Ivan ,its more the fact Russia’s force security behind the lines is almost non existent and as with everything this campaign shows Russia is very poor even in the basic military doctrine lol. Keep trying to polish that Russian turd Ivan.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yeah, Russian officers need to be further forward in order to put the barrels of their sidearms into the backs of conscripts to encourage them to advance or else…

Last edited 2 years ago by Sean
Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Nope, not at all Russkie boy, you lose top brass as most are as shite as the dross they lead. And as for Syria, you were a joke over there as well. Carpet bombing any old town as you cannot operate in any sort of modern, combined arms formations, with any tactical innovation or precision munitions. As I have said many times, Putin has shown to the world just how crap and un-scary your conscript dross is.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Hero award for bombing kids, wow! About normal, but I suppose if he actually flew more taining hours and less airshow flights he may have been combat capable. Average of 90-100 flying hrs per annum per pilot (the ones who fly the more modern airframes, less hours for the those who fly older platforms) means crap output, very basic skills and very basic coordination and combined arms ability. Target COORDs written on a fucking pice of paper, not in the targeting computer or even on his leg of his flight suit. Sad that anyone gets killed, but alas will be… Read more »

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

You really screwed that reply up didn’t you?

You are so determined to spew bile at me that you didn’t notice that I said he was a Hero of UKRAINE, a Ukrainian Air Force Senior, highly skilled and rated Colonel.

AS such how could he possibly be bombing kids?

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Gotcha! I knew I could screw a reply out of you! See past the reply and post troll boy! Far to easy!

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Ha ha ha that was far to easy, but now I have your interest any condemnation of Putins illegal invasion?

Angus
Angus
2 years ago

Like has been said many times in the past, it’s not only having the kit but knowing how to best use it and that is something we in the West do best. Big part of our budget is spent on training and there is no substitute for it. Quality over quantity. The heavy losses they (Russia) are suffering and moral is low for the most part as conscripts are just not up to it. We will all pay the price of this MAD MAN desire to have the old Soviet state back. I feel the little people everywhere.

Steve
Steve
2 years ago
Reply to  Angus

I am not sure it’s a training issue, or atleast not the core of the issue. Training would have been highlighted by significant operations (as in mass of planes being used) with heavy losses or failure to hit targets etc. There hasn’t it seems been heavy operations, the airforce appears to be lacking. Russian docerine is to accept higher losses than the west, so doubt it’s concerns about SAMs.

I wonder if it’s logistics again, it seems to be the core of the other issues so far.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Hi Steve, The linked to article highlights the training of the pilots and the training of the planners. Both are critical in the execution of large scale air operations in contested airspace. One of the reasons the RAF work so closely with civil air traffic control is to ensure that the UK has the ability to control airspace in any conditions, just getting large formations into and out of action is a complex problem. Then you have to make sure you don’t all arrive in the same bit of sky at the same time, or you will bump into each… Read more »

Pete
Pete
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Logistics and maintenance

This guy is worth following for rudimentary incites.

https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1499763286392385541?t=ebXONjcm521N1oFWg-wpBA&s=07

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  Angus

If we’re so superior why aren’t we stepping in to push Russia out of Ukraine rather than letting Putin get on with it? Putin has no qualms risking WW3 yet we, with better kit are too afraid oppose him with it. Makes no difference how good or superior you’re kit or training is if when your enemy attacks your neighbor you choose not to use it to threaten, deter them or drive them out.
We’re broadcasting to the ROTW we’re unreliable, weak & spineless allies.

Last edited 2 years ago by Frank62
GR
GR
2 years ago
Reply to  Frank62

Russia’s conventional forces would quickly be swept out of Ukraine if NATO chose to go in with its own conventional forces.

Unfortunately, that just makes the chances of Russia resorting to tactical yield battlefield nukes to (over)compensate far more likely, where it escalates to from there is not something that bears contemplating.

Paul B
Paul B
2 years ago

Back in the days of Stalin and his five year plans, the collective farms would often have a show field to demonstrate to the visiting officials that they were meeting their quota’s. These show fields were however just a stage managed front, picking the best examples from that collective and putting them all in the one field where they would then rot and die (from being prematurely harvested) once the officials had left. The rest of the farm bore no resemblance to the display put on in the show field and in fact, good food went to waste in keeping… Read more »

Puffing Billy
Puffing Billy
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

I know it’s not particularly relevant but years ago I remember the Queen and the D of E visiting RAF Lyneham. Their route around the station was decided upon and somebody went round and made a note of everything that could be seen from the route. What could be seen was then spruced up and painted. A succession of Royal visits down the years meant that buildings, including married quarters, etc were only ever half painted. The D of E, of course, would sometimes mess things up and go off route.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
2 years ago
Reply to  Puffing Billy

I remember something similar at Southend General Hospital urgent painting going on in the areas she was to visit despite reports at the time that hospital was suffering serious financial issues. That sort of thing is sadly endemic here. As for Russia you can guarantee they only put on display the most modern and spotless examples of their armaments to give an illusion of strength built as we see now on numbers over quality. So much of their equipment looks pretty identical to what I saw as a kid and the endless breakdowns they are suffering suggests that much of… Read more »

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
2 years ago

I think we all do hope that any Ukraine airforce left or in exile will be able to further knock out that large convoy and maybe also do some damage down south and maybe sink a Russian ship or two!
💪💪 and lots of missiles and planes to 🇺🇦 and its people!

Watcherzero
Watcherzero
2 years ago

Russia is relying on commercial Motorola GPS sets for its SU-34 planes to navigate rather than using its own system which just about tells you their state. Meanwhile their ground forces are using cellphones and unencrypted analog radios rather than secure comms.

https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1500624922321768449

Last edited 2 years ago by Watcherzero
Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

I suspect that is because we have modified their systems?

I am pretty sure that is why Google Maps and Apple Maps came offline when GLONASS was messed up so that there was not a quick fix.

I wonder if the encryption has been switched back on for accurate GPS in the region?

Marked
Marked
2 years ago

Russia has vast numbers of everything from nuclear subs, icbm’s, tanks, fighters, bombers, manpower etc. Yet a defence budget not far from the UK’s.

Knowing how ferociously expensive these systems are to operate I’d question how many are actually serviceable and available.

Also how many suitably trained and capable people are available in a military with a large number of conscripts.

It’s very possible Russia simply does not have the jets available to fly.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Marked

We have like 34 nuclear subs if you include all the crap sitting in Rosyth and Devenport and most of that is probably more serviceable than Russia nuclear subs.

Marked
Marked
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

Lol, exactly.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

Its a good point. Could the Trafalgar class subs and possibly swiftsure class be reactivated if they were needed? I think possibly yes. They would still be comparable too and probably better than most Russian and Chinese subs. Leaving Astute to take on capital ships and surface groups as well as Russia’s very best SSNs.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

No way.

You cannot reactivate reactors that have been out of commission for that long.

The certification has expired and the whole thing would need testing and certifying from the ground up which is not possible as the designs would not comply with current safety standards.

A reactor that is in service keeps its certification by grandfathering.

Then there is the little issue of hull life and the number of dive cycles that the hull can sustain.

Deep32
Deep32
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

In short, NO! For many reasons which @SB has provided some of.

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago
Reply to  Marked

The Russian SSN fleet, is essentially a Soviet fleet, even its new SSN (3) are build on dusted of Soviet programme.

The thinking is that the Soviet are focusing refits on turning SSNS into cruise missile boats because sending them directly against Western ASW assets and the modern generation of western SSNs would not end well for the Russian navy.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago

Russia has a defence budget of $60 billion per annum just a little more than the UK, with that they run an army of 900,000 men and air force of 4,000 aircraft a navy of 600 ships including 63 submarines not to mention a GPS system and significant space assets as well as 6000 nuclear weapons. That’s a force comparable to the USA which spends $600 billion a year. What we are seeing is the Russia has a hollow force because there is no way you can run a force like that on a budget that small even for a… Read more »

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

You mean the bad thing is China will be watching this and now fixing the problems within its own!?

It would be interesting to see a comparison of Russian equipment, as in how much of it they still have on the books was introduced in the 60s, 70’s, 80s etc upto now as I really doubt they have actually introduced much in the last 20 years.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  James

It’s difficult to fix though, decades of experience in operations and training have gone in to teaching western military forces and even when we are not all at war I.e. the USA in 1940 or 1982 we embed advisers in each other’s militaries to learn lessons. China has no experience at all in anything and the only people who can teach them I.e the Russians clearly don’t know what they are doing either. You can buy all the fancy toys you want but if no one teaches you how to use them then your screwed. Everything beings said in the… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

I agree, invading Ukraine should be easy for Russia. Logistically it is on their doorstep. Their land radars overlook it. It is well known to them and they could scout it out without attracting attention. I could go on and on but the conclusion is that they don’t have a clue and are not professional in depth. It will cause China to sit up and think and realise that any Russian military tech they have ripped off or bought is basically useless. So a lot of the stuff they have spent ages reverse engineering and building is basically garbage. That… Read more »

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

Easy??? The Ukrainian Army is the largest in Europe with 7 odd years of NATO training. It has got 8 years of operational fighting practice fighting in the Donbas. An estimated 60k of its infantry are right wing fanatics seeming determined to take as many others with them to Hell as they can. They come from the same strategic/tactical background as the Russians so understand what is likely to happen. Their equipment is very similar, if not identical to that which the Russians are using. They have received large numbers, game changing as a UA General put it, of ATGM.… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yes, the UKRAINIAN have the support of most of the population.”

Yes, the Ukrainian forces do have the support of most of the population…..

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Oh yeah its by far on par, Ukraine was spending circa 4.3 billion on defence, whats Russia’s budget again?

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn same shite you come up with. Trolling must be easy to get into and hard to get out, as those potatoes wont be given free son, you have to work hard trolling to get them.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

What did I say that was shite as you so eloquently put it? Come on, get your brain in gear and critique my comments, not just spout your normal shite.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Troll now angry, Troll not like being trolled, Troll been talking shite for about 3 weeks now, naughty troll! Any condemnation of Putins illegal invasion of Ukraine?

Posse Comitatus
Posse Comitatus
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Strange really, because the Russians don’t seem to be very good at fighting the Ukrainian military, but very good at fighting unarmed civilians.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

Indeed, the tried the soft approach for a couple of days but then they remembered the US/NATO way, as so profesionally demonstrated in, at random Libya, Iraq etc., bomb the place flat, who cares about civilians, then go in. Methinks glasshouses comes to mind.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Oooooh handbag! You’re true self is showing as you get angrier troll boy!

Posse Comitatus
Posse Comitatus
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

bomb the place flat, who cares about civilians, then go in.

That was and is the tactics of the jihadi suicide bombers , Republican Guards, ISIS, Taliban, Russian military and Wagner group. Due in no small way to their absolute lack of training, tactics, leadership and just about everything else. No war is ever clean and sterile, but NATO and Western forces make strenuous efforts to avoid civilian casualties albeit not always successfully. But they try.

But your lot are making headlines worldwide with their combat ineptitude and contempt for civilian life. Strongman my arse !!

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Can you give examples of which cities in Iraq and Libya the West flattened in the way Russia is currently needlessly flattening towns and cities in Ukraine please?

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Pretty sure Russia is the European nation with the largest army. But given Ukrainebis the second largest country in Europe it makes sense it would have the 2nd largest… especially when the largest army marched in 7 years ago and occupied part of its territory. If you’re referring to the Azov Battalion, they certainly don’t number 60k. The far-right are such a minority that in the last election they polled 2% in the election and won zero seats in parliament. Whereas in Russia the far-right party, lead by Vladimir Putin has been in power for decades. Sounds like you’re preparing… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago

That’s why we really need a focus on China around countering it Mercantile strategy. We are funding their R and D as well as their industrial capabilities, while at the same time they actively work again Western influence.

The west still has the advantage in most areas and we need to keep that advantage, because China is just waiting until it thinks it has the edge.

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago
Reply to  James

even most of their new systems were actually dusted off Soviet programme that got suspended after the fall of the Soviet Union.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

My big concern, given the general poor quality of the Russian military, would now be the safety controls and procedures around their nuclear forces to prevent accidental or rogue launches.

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

Martin, thanks for your inputs, good points, hadn’t thought of that, but logical.

Challenger
Challenger
2 years ago

Pretty clear that trying to be one of the big boys with a moderate economy means even spending a big chunk of your GDP forces most of that cash to be channelled into quantity rather than quality both in terms of kit and more importantly training.

Very much starting to look like a paper tiger, except of course where nukes are concerned.

Steve R
Steve R
2 years ago
Reply to  Challenger

They’re the definition of paper tiger. From what we’ve seen the past 10 days in Ukraine a single UK armoured division with some Apaches and Typhoons for air cover and even a dozen GLMRS plus some other artillery, fighting alongside the Ukrainians, would have beaten the crap out of the Russian forces!

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve R

Agree. A British armoured division formation would probably be able to defeat 3 or 5 to 1 ratio of Russian army with ease.
The Russians aee really only proving that any attack vs either a NATO country or Finland/ Sweden will result in a swift and painful lesson in modern warfare.

S Rice
S Rice
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

It’s like the Russian army missed the whole chapter on Combined Arms and logistical support. They lost the war and don’t even know it yet.

Marked
Marked
2 years ago

Off topic… but anyone else seen the stories that Putin could have terminal bowel cancer? Treatments accounting for his puffy face, in pain so affecting his mood, also explaining why he’s in such a rush to leave a legacy? If a bankrupt pariah state counts as a legacy…

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
2 years ago
Reply to  Marked

Yes, making headlines as we speak!

Pete
Pete
2 years ago
Reply to  Marked

Based on green screen conspiracy stuff he may already be a ghost 👻

Marked
Marked
2 years ago
Reply to  Pete

If he isn’t I hope he is soon! Normally I’d wish him a long slow departure, at the moment though the quicker the better!

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
2 years ago
Reply to  Marked

I have mentioned this a few times. First mention of his health go at least a year back and for some time now it’s been claimed he is on Steroids for a presumed medical condition. Why I suspect he doesn’t want people who matter too close. It does leave the concern that yes it’s an all out play for a statue in Red Square as he leaves this world but more importantly if he doesn’t get what he wants he will be happy take the rest of us with him his demands are impossible to give so it may well… Read more »

Marked
Marked
2 years ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

The fact the people in the chain of command have families, not to mention possibly lucrative assets to be hopefully unfrozen once their mad leader is departed, there’s a hope they would see the madness of triggering a totally pointless nuclear exchange where Russia isn’t even threatened.

I would hope someone is putting feelers out in diplomatic circles to assure them life will improve for them once their mad leader is out of way and some rational thinking resumes.

Mark Franks
Mark Franks
2 years ago

The Ukrainian Air and ground forces are well versed in Russian military tactics and are familiar with Russian kit. Simply put Ukraine was a satellite state of the Soviet Union. The same Russian planning and tactics was used in Chechnya, Georgia and Syria. The Ukrainians are using man portable ground to air missiles and have been trained to use them. Parts of Ukraine remain a high threat environment for the Russian Airforce. I’m astonished at the seeming lack of countermeasures the Russians deploying. Looking at video footage of Russian rotary assets flying straight and level throwing out loads of flares,… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago
Reply to  Mark Franks

The lack of counter measures and evasive terrain following flying are interesting. I watched the KA52 Havoc being shot down by US supplied Stinger. The Havoc was flying low, slow and straight. Very easy to get a stinger to lock on and bring it down.

Bringer of Facts
Bringer of Facts
2 years ago

I fear this war will go beyond Ukraine, Once Putin has subjugated most of the country he will then turn his attention to the Baltic states, I reckon he is holding back his Airforce for the coming war with NATO.

RobW
RobW
2 years ago

I’d say Moldova and Georgia are more likely, both ex-soviet and neither are in NATO. Far easier pickings. Assuming of course he hasn’t died of cancer (allegedly), been kicked out, or Russia hasn’t run out of money.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Or all his tanks have not had a visit from Mr NLAWS or JAVELIN and the aircraft and helos from Mr Stinger?

RobW
RobW
2 years ago

One can hope! If we can keep the supplies going into Ukraine it seems Russia are going to lose an awful lot of equipment, plus the poor sods who operate them.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

What I hope this that with those nicely bunged up convoys they boys who operate them are now out of the vehicles so the vehicles and stores can be destroyed with minimum loss of life.

The conscripts can then say, hand on heart, I did what I was told and my vehicle was destroyed with my AK47 in it so I had to surrender.

Tanks and helos are being destroyed a quite a rate whoever you believe.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Yes. Moldova and Georgia. He might simply infiltrate those two – ‘intervene to stop internal strife’.

I am not too worried in truth. He takes today what will be impossible to hold on to in a few years. In the past victors could impose a ‘Carthaginian Peace’; that is, kill the entire population (see also ‘the Harrying of the North’ after the Norman Conquest). I don’t suppose he is up for that. These places will be impossible to subjugate entirely. And Putin is biodegradable like as all.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Well he already has break away regions in both those countries. Just like Ukraine….

Martin
Martin
2 years ago

He would get slaughtered in the Baltics, now we have a counter to his hybrid war and enough pre positioned assets they would have very little chance. AirPower alone would do the trick. S400 appears to be nonsense as does his A2AD bubble in Kaliningrad.

Steve
Steve
2 years ago

Not so sure anymore. Even if Russia wins this war, their miltiary strength and the associated influence that brings has been destroyed. I think most people didn’t expect Ukraine to fall without a fight but equally I doubt many thought Russia would struggle as much as they have. The 170k plus forces they had amassed on the border, seem to have vanished and changed into small skirmish forces. Could that army realistically take on a much more modern miltiary that they would find in any attack on a NATO country. I doubt even Putin is that blinded that he hasn’t… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Steve
Bringer of Facts
Bringer of Facts
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Well, we simply do not know yet, looks like they are sticking to the old Soviet doctrine of using conscripts as cannon fodder, to wear your enemy down and deplete his ammo levels. Russia has plenty of reserve forces, I just feel they have not fully committed everything to the battle yet. I know they have a few S-400s standing off outside of Ukraine, but I have yet to see any more evidence they have sent their cutting-edge tech into the fray.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

You are correct. There is no evidence that the Russians have committed much if any of their top line Guards armies. Regardless of what we think here it must be worrying NATO that the Russians are rolling over Ukraine, albeit slowly, with what are, apart from the VKS (airborne) and Naval Infantry, their second tier forces. We are not seeing the heavy, fast, hammer down strikes that might have been expected. Just look at the gear, that gets so many comments here, it is simply old. There are videos out there of the DNR/Russian advances with a few T-72 and… Read more »

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

You are looking not very hard then Ivan I’ve seen plenty of knocked out and abandoned on a daily basis T80’s, T90’s and TOS but fuel tankers seem to be Russia’s major priority and they are knocked out for fun .

Bringer of Facts
Bringer of Facts
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

Yep, there are a lot of T-72/T-80/T90s taken out, no sign of the much-hyped T-14/T-15 yet.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

You won’t see them either.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Because they’re vapourware 🤷🏻‍♂️
Because they can’t even get them to start? 😆

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

JohninMK is trying to look on the bright side.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Thanks but not really the bright side, more a different side.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Different side to sanity would be called?….

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Top line? Hilarious, am considering sending over the UK Air Cadets to give your Russkie shite some soldiering skills….NATO isnt worried, as all Putin boy has done is destroy any image we may have had of an improvment of your Russkie skills. Total laughing stock son, laughing stock.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I’d suggest the Girl Guides…

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

😂🤣😂🤣

Somebody not heard of defence in depth.
Somebody not heard of letting your enemy stretch his logistics to breaking, then break it for him.
What’s the point in advancing fast across the countryside when you run out of fuel and have to walk back to Russia.. while farmers tow away your AFVs with their tractors!!! 🤣

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Rolling over Ukraine? Ah yeah they decided to go around all of the towns to make it look good on a map that they had gained lots of territory then somehow ended up in a traffic jam with themselves that they cant get out of. Very very impressive indeed.

If they had actually stopped to fight at each place they wanted to take over they would have hardly made it a few miles into Ukraine itself by now.

JamesD
JamesD
2 years ago

Lost another SU34 last night, a patrol ship has possibly been sunk by a grad mlrs-of all things and reports that up to 30 helicopters were destroyed on the ground at an airfield near Kherson.
if that last one is true that is a massive failure on the part of Russian AD and I’d possibly start thinking this whole thing is being sabotaged from within, I just can’t understand how they can be this inept.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  JamesD

With things like the Rivet Joint hoovering digital info up we know where everything with a radio of any kind is?

So not hard to say a cluster of X radios is at ABC coordinates – enough to be worth the risk?

I don’t think Putin will want to use his scrapyard landing ships in action against Odessa. There is enough JAVELIN there to make a landing very, very hard. One in though the doors as they open…..

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago

Or even while they were shut !

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

Well quite

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

Without their air force the Russians will still succeed. Of, course success here is shelling civilians until the rest give up. The mistake is to think that Putin is in any way likely to be bothered by fatalities and destruction. He isn’t, wasn’t ever and won’t be. Ukraine will have to surrender soon. The real question is then, what next? I have abandoned my belief in British made. I think we and the rest of European N.A.T.O. just have buy off the shelf or even surplus to ramp up our military and fast.We must expect widespread wobbles and defections from… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

I have abandoned my belief in British made”

Like NLAWS – made in Belfast at the old Shorts factory?

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago

So where is this showroom where you can just pitch up and buy all the latest gear off the shelf ?

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

Showroom, no.

Ability to make things, yes.

A lot of good things are made in the UK.

A non exhaustive list:-

QEC
T45
T23 -> T26
T31/T32
Ceptor
NLAWS
Typhoon
Radar2
Hard bits of the F35
EJ2000 and family
Various RR GT’s
Electric drive motors for ships
Artisan
SAMPSON

The list goes on a lot longer than that…..and that is all top drawer stuff.

There are some things that we should just buy such as P8 & F35B.

There is a balance to be struck.

Buying everything off the shelf isn’t a solution at all.

RobW
RobW
2 years ago

That is quite a list and, most importantly, they are all well maintained!

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago

My apologies, my misunderstanding. I thought you were advocating a shopping trip to Davis Monthan or something similar. Indeed we do make some top quality kit, we just don`t do it very quickly. At the moment I do believe a degree of urgency is required.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago

Beat me to it. I still believe in British made. Anyone seen what a Chally 2 could do to a formation of T72MBs or T80s from 2 miles away. Answer is slaughter them. NLAWS made in Belfast. Lets have another 20,000 the Ukranians say they are very effective at killing all Russian armoured vehicles including their MBTs. Type 45 destroyer would make a mess of any attacking Russian aircraft. QE carrier even with just 24 F35Bs onboard could probably destroy most of the Russian airforce. F35B is i consider partly British made and huge success story for UKPLC. The number… Read more »

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

We are spending much more than we need elsewhere for equipment that won’t come along in years and may be out of date when it is available. Presently we have to get up armed quickly. Lease Lend, Bloke,

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Nope

Common stockpiles with US as per the P-8 are the way forwards.

We put in say the Mk41 VLS and use Standard-6 at least to start with an then change over to the new Anglo French solution if it is better. That way we have something that goes bang from the off but don’t waste massive piles of cash on short term solutions.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

Yes. That is what I implied. We do not have time on our side. I still do not think Russia will give up on its invasion until Putin is toppled. Meanwhile we and the Europeans need to re-equip with whatever we can get our hands on. The ‘common stockpiles’ could include tanks and aircraft presently stored in the U.S.

Steve R
Steve R
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Why on earth would we buy surplus?!

What’s wrong with Typhoon, in terms of combat aircraft? Expensive but highly capable. With Germany’s defence budget looking to increase and ours very likely to, the two countries could easily purchase 100 Typhoons as a bulk purchase and take 50 each.

If any other European air forces wanted to beef up I’d say go for Typhoon. The more of them ordered, the cheaper they will get so winning all round!

Even buying “off the shelf” takes a long time. Might as well get something potent like Typhoons.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve R

Tomorrow? Next year? 2030?

Steve R
Steve R
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

I read on the SkyNews site yesterday that Defence is the most likely department to get a budget increase and, if it happens, would be announced on 23rd of this month in the spring statement. Buying equipment “off the shelf” doesn’t literally mean it’s available right then and there. Take the F35 for example: they’re being built and there is a long list of customers. Even if we said we’re increasing to 200 of them and put the money in we won’t get them all for a while. Why should we buy something second rate that might not even be… Read more »

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve R

“we’re not going to throw lives and assets into the meat grinder and just accept high losses.”

Just Ukrainian lives it seems.

Steve R
Steve R
2 years ago
Reply to  Frank62

If it were up to me, no. Watching Russia indiscriminately shelling cities and slaughtering Ukrainians – soldiers and civilians – honestly makes my blood boil! I’m in favour of covertly helping out Ukraine. If I were in charge I’d be sending our F35s in covertly to down Russian aircraft and target Russian SAM sites, massed artillery etc inside Ukraine to give Ukrainian ground forces a better chance. Being F35s they should evade radar detection and therefore no evidence we were ever there. That’s how I’d do it. The section you quoted from me there: I was referring to sending our… Read more »

Expat
Expat
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve R

Would be better to give the T1s to Poland and they give there Su27s to Ukraine. But of course those SU27 would have been upgraded with nato stand off weapons nudge nudge wink wink. So plausible deniability. We’d just say any stand off weapons that hit Russian armour was fired from there newly acquired su27s. That’s what Putin would do, need to play him at his own game.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve R

Steve, you are correct but this is an emergency. We and the Europeans need to pout on a show of strength. Put the wind up the bast@rds!

Steve R
Steve R
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Is it really that much of an emergency? We’re not facing imminent invasion, nor is anyone in NATO. Russia has its hands full with Ukraine right now and will do for months if not years. If we bought jets e.g. F16 Block 70 or F15EX right now we won’t take delivery for several months or so at least. Even for older versions, if they’re in the Boneyard or any long-term storage they’ll still take months to make ready. I’m also not comfortable putting our pilots in lesser aircraft in a knee-jerk reaction. Even then it would take the best part… Read more »

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

I think that is very pessimistic even if it is what I feared before this begun. But I think the fears in the west are such now and the Russian efforts so appallingly poor, plus the deranged leader means my view is now very different. Can’t see any formal surrender coming when nearly three quarters or so of the country is still in their hands or un-occupied. Fact is if Kiev falls, esp if it’s greatly destroyed, the Russians will have created a generational hatred and will have united Ukrainians ( not mention appal any Russians who get to hear… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Spyinthesky
Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Thanks for your excellent analysis. I want to see N.A.T.O. preparedness visible and large scale. Frustratingly, we have been outmanoeuvred by a man who did something no rational human being would have done. Our options are limited now this monster is waging war on civilians, knowing we care about them. I am sure a lot is being done to help the Ukrainians fight back but how many civilian lives can they afford? I agree it will be impossible for Putin to maintain an army of occupation or a puppet in place for very long. The west must catch up quickly.… Read more »

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Or how many Javelins, Stingers, NLAWs do we need to give the Ukrainians until they’ve destroyed every functional tank in the Russian army…?

RobW
RobW
2 years ago

Off topic. According to Ian Blackford recent events are very good reason to abandon our nukes. Then goes on to say that Scotland would look to join NATO straight away on independence. So apparently a nuclear armed/backed defence pact is a good idea, but having them yourself isn’t. I’m sure there is logic there somewhere.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Not that I agree with him however given the highly accurate nature of nuclear weapons today and the likely first target of any nuclear strike beings to take out the enemies nuclear weapons then Scotland and Faslane would be the number one and possibly only target in the UK of a limited nuclear strike by the Russians. Given that’s just a few miles from Scotland biggest city you can see a point of being in a nuclear armed alliance but not having the biggest target in Europe on your door step. Obviously an independent Scotland would not be nuclear armed… Read more »

RobW
RobW
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

Given the size of the UK we are all stuffed if Putin launched nukes at us. He’d likely take out Glasgow and Edinburgh early on anyway, regardless of Faslane. Something like 10 nukes (which is a limited strike given their number) would take out all the large metropolitan areas. All of which is mad more likely if we don’t have nukes to fire back.

On that lovely note, lets reassure ourselves that Russian military kit is so badly maintained that they may not fire anyway.

Expat
Expat
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

So it ironic the SNP claimed defence companies would remain in Scotland post independence but miraculously these facilities would not be targets. You couldn’t make it up.

Expat
Expat
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

. The only thing Scotland will have going for it as a member of nato is its territory. The US would mandate bases in Scotland must host nuclear capabie bombers as an entry criteriato nato. So that pretty much puts it on the nuclear strike list. As usual the SNP present a complex issue as a simple binary choice that’s there’s to make.

Steve R
Steve R
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

He’s just talking crap! The only thing I can think of that he might mean that might make a lick of sense is that if we ditched our nukes we could afford to have a full-sized army, navy and RAF again. And we could. We could probably have a 100,000+ army with 300+ tanks. Or we could probably have a full RAF with 20+ fast jet squadrons Or we could probably have a potent Royal Navy with 30 or so frigates and destroyers and 12-15 Astute class submarines. Of course, none of that means a damn thing if it or… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

He’s just a telly tubby. No one listens to Tinky Winky. Why would you?

Nick Cole
Nick Cole
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

This was an intelligent discussion until you pitched in.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Logic is not required. It is simply dishing the English. All that matters. Rub the people who provide you with a living standard up the wrong way as frequently as possible

John Clark
John Clark
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Their nuclear strategy and that of general nuclear disarmament has been utterly trashed …. Simple fact, if you haven’t got nuclear weapons, or access to them, then nothing will stop Putin (or the next crackpot in the Kremlin) revving up his T90’s…

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Well giving up it’s nukes has worked out so well for the Ukraine…

Blackbird is a blistering idiot, the SNPs very own version of Diana Abbot 😆

Nick Cole
Nick Cole
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

The much greater majority of NATO nations don’t have nukes anyway.

RobW
RobW
2 years ago
Reply to  Nick Cole

They are all protected by Article 5 and the nuclear umbrella of the US, France and the UK that’s why.

Nick Cole
Nick Cole
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Didn’t I imply that in my original response? In relation to the thread of course.

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago
Reply to  Nick Cole

But several hosted US weapons throughout the Cold War, UK, Germany, Greece, Spain, Turkey etc.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

Many still do.

Daveyb
Daveyb
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

I believe it is called NIMBYISM = not in my back yard, but I’m happy to go along with it!

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

I’d consign Blackford’s comment straight into the bin.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Well he is towing the historical party line. This has been the policy for a long time so you need to look into why and when the snp started the no nuclear weapons in Scotland and with that where they are now is just a continuation of that policy. Up to a few weeks/months ago not many really thought nuclear weapons would be used. Now he is right on that it’s a huge target on Scotland/U.K. and will every other country in nato be hit with nukes if the big button was pushed? So the thinking of maybe Scotland would… Read more »

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago

We should stop trembling in fear of Putin & put the fear of God back into him. Either he stops his invasion or we go in to do so. Everything else is futile concience-salving & just leaves him to get on with it. Stop appeasing brutal dictators. There’s no easy options, but making the wrong, inneffective choices just guarantees more of this.
Time for talks is over.

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago

Putin has planned this for at least a year in advance but somehow the Russian air force was told too late? Doesn’t make any sense.
Let’s face it, Russian money has been bribing western governments to disarm into the terrible weakness we’re in today & compromising our leaders for over 10 years. Putin gambled on us being too weak & stupid to intervene while he snuffs out a free democratic European nation. He threatens, escalates & bluffs & we just let him get on with it.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Frank62

Russian money in no way has gone into governments disarming, thats a ridiculous statement and just complete cobblers.

Nick Cole
Nick Cole
2 years ago

Interesting question. Perhaps one answer apart from the obvious incompetence issues and over-control from the centre is that Putin is trying to goad NATO into responding and he is therefore trying to keep his air force avalable for that scenario. In this sense a no-fly-zone, aside from the inevitable escalation issues, doesn’t achieve a great deal when there is a massive ground based artillery capability. Also having a land corridor to supply weapons and systems to Ukraine also risks dragging the corridor countries into the conflict. Putin has already threatened nuclear attack if anyone helps them.

Steven Alfred Rake
Steven Alfred Rake
2 years ago

A very interesting artical but to people of an age were they can remember the fiasco of 1991 when the Soviet empire imploded the reports of Russian equipment left in East Germany and Poland stating that a good 75% of the aircraft had there braking systems drained of flued as the Russian guards would drain them to drink as they could not afford to buy the local vodka. The same was true for the Russian tanks and APC’s, with chronic alcoholism in the Russian forces being blamed for the lack of preparedness in the Russian and Soviet bloc forces. Fast… Read more »

RobW
RobW
2 years ago

Russia looking for a way out? Just posted on the BBC. Personally I think the Kremlin are monitoring this site as I posted all this as a suggestion the other day (I don’t think that really). What is missing is a permanent UN presence to guarantee the peace. Worth it I’d say as Ukraine are giving up things they didn’t have anyway. Plus they can always amend their constitution after Putin has gone to enable them to join the EU if they want. although not sure if they mean Ukraine has to give up its arms – which is obviously… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by RobW
David Lloyd
David Lloyd
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Appease them now with territory and guess what? After they have been re-supplied and they re-group they will continue bombing civvies and lay waste to the rest of Ukraine. Followed by Moldova, Finland and Sweden while we faf around with sanctions – that deter nothing.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Finland and Sweden are very well trained and mostly equipped militarily, Russia would not have an easy time of either country.

The terrain of Finland for a start would make taking it very difficult and if Finland was attacked absolutely no doubt Sweden would mobilise to assist as if Finland fell then Sweden would be next.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Putin’s tactics would be terror as with Ukraine. Go after people and cities, infrastructure and produce a refugee crisis. He wouldn’t think twice about the consequences.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

They would be but he would struggle massively to do this in Finland and Sweden.

Ukraine is flat and has vast open spaces, hes easily rolled in and surround Ukrainian towns and cities.

Finland is not flat and its forces are also very well trained in the territory. The Russians found out once they are not easy to invade and would find the exact same problem again, especially with Sweden backing them up.

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

With Putin having broken most of his promises, demanding everybody aceeds to his every demand, killing civilians trying to use humanitarian corridors during so called cease fires & being a permanent member of the UN security council, I think a UN security force is pie in the sky. If Ukraine can survive & win, as I hope & pray, she’ll need a strong & well equipped military to prevent another Russian tyrant trying it again. Becoming part of NATO will be a must & we must waive the conflict impediment for them given the situation. Threatening nukes on anyone standing… Read more »

DanielMorgan
DanielMorgan
2 years ago

It would not surprise if we discovered later that the US has been funneling photo and electronic/radar intelligence from satellites as well as aircraft to Ukraine. The US has deployed a number of intelligence platforms on the perimeter of Ukraine. There is one report of F-35s flying along the Polish Ukraine border with all sensors active.

GlynH
GlynH
2 years ago
Reply to  DanielMorgan

I reckon that it a certainty, that Ukrainian ballistic attack last week that destroyed a few Su-30s. Much easier to target aircraft on the apron if you know exactly where they are sat and with only a few mins delay. i.e. live sat. feed.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  DanielMorgan

Was it not in the news earlier today that the US are relaying satellite imagery to Ukraine within 1-2 hours of viewing it themselves?

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  DanielMorgan

I think we can bank on real time intelligence of all kinds is going to the Ukrainians.

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago
Reply to  DanielMorgan

They are. The militia in Luhank have published photos of a NATO badged and serial numbered laptop they found with a load of other stuff in a Ukrainian Army bunker.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Hopefully it is the case, but I would believe anything the Luhansk Nazis say. Easy enough to buy a NATO sticker of Amazon

Ukrainepolis
Ukrainepolis
2 years ago

In the past, the UK Secretary of Defence said the country will not allow the Ukranian military to collapse. Any updates on this!

GlynH
GlynH
2 years ago

In hindsight, I’m not surprised. Looking at it, the Russian armed forces have for a while now been talking up their super-duper-unstoppable weapons that will rain destruction on anyone who dare challenge their greatness. But, when it comes down to it they can’t organise a piss-up in a brewery. If Su-30s etc. are so world beating, why are their burning hulks littering Ukraine, if dolly-parton, kontakt & relikt are impervious to APFSDS & ATGMs, why are fairly modern T-72s, 80s etc. being abandoned (some intact) along with their protective Pantsirs. The Kremlin needs to stop antagonising the West, not least… Read more »

Tom Keane
Tom Keane
2 years ago

“Why hasn’t Russia achieved air superiority of Ukraine” Maybe it does not wish to unleash it massive air power yet?

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago
Reply to  Tom Keane

Or maybe most of it doesn`t work.

Tom Keane
Tom Keane
2 years ago

How practical would it be for Europe via a 3rd party, to ‘lease’ fighter jets to Ukraine? (whilst providing training on the quiet)

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Tom Keane

They would have to lease pilots aswell, training takes a long time unless its jets like Poland have that the Ukrainian pilots can fly.

They didnt have a huge airforce to start with so pilots will be limited regardless of how many jets can be supplied.

Air defence is more what they need but again training is the issue, the more capable systems arent just roll in and turn them on for anyone to use.

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago

For any of us old fogies this is deja vu all over again. All through the cold war we were scared shitless by the Soviet armed forces on display at the may day parades. When their kit proved mostly useless in the Arab – Israeli wars some said the Russians were keeping their top line kit back and just selling their junk to Nasser, Assad etc. THen the cold war ended and we got a close look at their top line kit and found it was little or no different to the junk used in 67 or 73. Plus poor… Read more »

farouk
farouk
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

David wrote: For any of us old fogies this is deja vu all over again. All through the cold war we were scared shitless by the Soviet armed forces on display at the may day parades. When their kit proved mostly useless in the Arab – Israeli wars some said the Russians were keeping their top line kit back When the T72 came out, NATO had a fit : superiour armour 125mm Gun (The 125mm was developed in answer to the British 105mm, which in turn was devloped after somebody drove a T54A armed with a 100mm gun into the… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by farouk
GlynH
GlynH
2 years ago
Reply to  farouk

Here’s the thing though, they are deploying dolly-parton, kontakt & relikt now and its not up to scratch; at least not on first glance.

Tom Keane
Tom Keane
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

I am in no way a ‘war hawk’, as I have family serving in the armed forces, however if the ‘assessments’ are correct, it seems to me that the time has come, to take care of the ‘Russian issue’ once and for all. The USSR/Russia have been the source of conflict and trouble since 1945, as far as more learned people than I have attested to over the years. All the billions of pounds, dollars, roubles and nowadays euros, that could have been used elsewhere, and in more ‘humanitarian interest’ ways. If we do not fix Europe politically once and… Read more »

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago
Reply to  Tom Keane

See your point but Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world. The conundrum has been how do they possess so much military power on the back of such a small economy. That has been answered in Ukraine. They don’t. Militarily they pose almost zero threat to a revitalised NATO. Revitalised by there own stupidity in attacking Ukraine. They may deal with the deep seated problems of corruption etc but it will be adecade before it produces significant results and even if it does the stagnation and poor performance of their economy will not go away.

Tom Keane
Tom Keane
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

Damn what weapons the Russians have, we need to stop them now. Doing less is a humanitarian disaster, and a crime again humanity.

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago
Reply to  Tom Keane

Arm the Ukrainians to the teeth. Which as far as an outsider can judge is what the west is doing. Could we do more ? We only know as much as we’re told but what we’re being told is unprecedented. If one Russian sets foot on NATO territory it would mean all out war. If it’s the other way around it would mean the same and all out war between nuclear armed nations is something to be avoided.

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

Hi David .Your observation is really interesting. I served in the SAAF Ops and Intel for a few years . We captured a vast amount of soviet equipment during a major ops in Southern Angola in 1984. I had a good look at the captured soviet gear, all of which was really aged i.e. T54/5, D30 122mm howitzers, MB 21 etc. That being said, the stuff was pretty much fit for “basic” purposes and I’m told, mechanically robust . The general view was their maintenance standards were poor. Some of the air defence was impressive- the SA8 commanded respect. Where… Read more »

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Thanks for your first hand knowledge on facing this stuff for real. No I know very little about tactics and doctrine. Have been digging out old books on the Soviet Armed Forces from WW2 and cold war eras most of which I can barely grasp. That’s the stuff for the experts on here.

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

cheers DS – do share anything new that comes too light. I think we can all relate to the Soviet Afghanistan experience as an example of what we’ve been chatting about.

Stay safe Mate.

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

If youve ever owned or worked on a Lada youll get a good idea of Russian build quality.

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

😀The modern Russian kit has come a long way from the old Lada. Their newest stuff has a CD player and go faster stripes.

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

😀😀😀

Johnathan Galt
Johnathan Galt
2 years ago

There’s another possibility – that there is a rift within the Russian government, and some simply aren’t going along with Putin’s war. Perhaps some generals are aware that this ploy risks WW III, and don’t want to be vaporized?

AlexS
AlexS
2 years ago

Air Superiority? What is the definition?

GlynH
GlynH
2 years ago
Reply to  AlexS

Wiki put it well . .
Friendly Forces Opposing Forces
Aerial supremacy Aerial incapability
Aerial superiority Aerial denial
Aerial parity Aerial parity
Aerial denial Aerial superiority
Aerial incapability Aerial supremacy

AlexS
AlexS
2 years ago

Probably the same reason that Italian Regia Aeronautica had less sortie rate in WW2 then in Spanish Civil War: Many top military echelon people did not agree with war.

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  AlexS

I think Alexski its coming down the lack of quality training of Russian pilots and also the lack of Russian guided munitions hence the having to fly low .

David
David
2 years ago

I have no love for the Russians – but they do make beautiful planes! (still, I’ll take a Typhoon any day!).

George Kamburoff
George Kamburoff
2 years ago

Today I read more than 10,000 anti-tank missiles were sent into Ukraine by us and our allies. We can hope there were a substantial number of antiaircraft systems as well.

George Kamburoff
George Kamburoff
2 years ago

The Twitter reference posted by Pete (below) is revealing.

Scott Sparks
Scott Sparks
2 years ago

I suspect that rampant corruption within the Russian Military and Government is part of the issue here. Rumors about that 40 mile long convoy North of Kiev having lots of flat tires due to using cheap Chinese knockoffs of Michelin tires are one example of this. You can bet that some General somewhere changed the supplier to the Cheap tires and diverted the rest of those funds into his Swiss Bank account. The same seems true to fuel supplies, and MRE’s. I was just watching a video where Ukrainian’s were looting an abandon Russian truck and opening MRE packages. The… Read more »

JohninMK
JohninMK
2 years ago

A general announcement to those esteemed commenters here who often reply to my posts with the most erudite of comments.

I appologise if I am not picking up and replying to your posts but I seem to have dropped of this site’s excellent ‘post replied to’ system so I am only seeing said posts as I flick through.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

No your email deliveries are being disrupted disrupted by all the cyberattacks that are going on over the internet in Russia; DOS attacks using up bandwidth, DNS going down, etc…

except you claim to be in MK…

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

In no way defending dear comrade above but I have actually had disruption in the same, had a load of notifications yesterday for replies made 5/6/7 days ago, usually the system works very well.

Meirion X
Meirion X
2 years ago
Reply to  JohninMK

So proof of the pudding that you operate from Russia then, it is simi cut off from the worldwide Internet.
You only have yourselves to blame!

SD67
SD67
2 years ago

How about the obvious – it’s a bl**dy big country. Lviv to Kharkiv 1000 kms.

Chin
Chin
2 years ago

Air superiority is needed if enemy Air Force is attacking your ground vehicles. That is not the case here because of availability of SAMs on Russian side. So why risk aerial assets whose small lose can effect moral.

Joe Hanson
Joe Hanson
2 years ago

I’ve read through the comments posted here & regarding Russian failings in Ukraine & the triumph of NATO armament/arms. Well guys, you’ve no knowledge of history. For if you did, you’ll know that during the Winter War of 1939 between Russia and Finland, similar to what has been happening in Ukraine, the Russian military initially performed very badly and was almost routed by the Finns, who by the way and similar to what is currently happening with Ukraine, fielded arms sent by other European countries including the Gloster Gladiator fighter aircraft sent by the UK. The Finns very adept at… Read more »

Jaimz33
Jaimz33
1 year ago

Russia didn’t have this problem in Syria . They coordinated missions adequately there.