The White House said there are “strong indications” that Iran’s test of a new ballistic missile has violated a UN Security Council resolution.

White House press secretary, Josh Earnest said that such violations are “nothing new”. Earnest said the Iranians have “almost serially” violated international concerns about the country’s ballistic missile programme.

The missile, Emad, is an Iranian designed intermediate range ballistic missile with a claimed range of 2,500 km and 1,750 kg payload. The missile was revealed by Brigadier General Hossein Dehghan earlier this month.

On the missile’s accuracy, Israeli defence engineer and analyst Uzi Rubin said:

“The Emad represents a major leap in terms of accuracy. It has an advanced guidance and control system in its nose cone”.

The issue is to be raised at the United Nations Security Council to let the body determine whether or not Iran violated any international resolution.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

David H Lewis
David H Lewis (@guest_335003)
8 years ago

How long before Israel puts these systems ‘beyond use’?

John Stewart
John Stewart (@guest_335049)
8 years ago
Reply to  David H Lewis

the yanks are keeping them on a leash, and isreal is getting fed up

Art Vandelay
Art Vandelay (@guest_335191)
8 years ago
Reply to  David H Lewis

One would hope Israel has a plan/capability. Meantime, what is the Western ‘community’ going to do ?

Jun Nacario Baguio
Jun Nacario Baguio (@guest_335004)
8 years ago

rogue nations improved their war offense capability while obama remain silent…russia a threat to nato countries, while china encroachment to south asian sea…

Ross Hendrie
Ross Hendrie (@guest_335025)
8 years ago

I thought this sort of thing was supposed to have been halted by a treaty with the Americans? ??

John Stewart
John Stewart (@guest_335050)
8 years ago
Reply to  Ross Hendrie

the yanks got screwed

Art Vandelay
Art Vandelay (@guest_335192)
8 years ago
Reply to  Ross Hendrie

Too parochial. Where was the rest of the West during these negotiations ? President Obama is indeed very bad news, but the Europeans’ response was…what ?

Ross Hendrie
Ross Hendrie (@guest_335193)
8 years ago
Reply to  Ross Hendrie

The Europeans’ response was to ignore the situation and hope it will go away. Aka their usual response to trouble.

John Stewart
John Stewart (@guest_335032)
8 years ago

obama has head in ass

UK Defence Journal
UK Defence Journal (@guest_335046)
8 years ago
Reply to  John Stewart

What?

John Stewart
John Stewart (@guest_335047)
8 years ago
Reply to  John Stewart

he though Iran was going to fallow the treaty, when every one knows they wont

Julien Dixon
Julien Dixon (@guest_335048)
8 years ago

I dont think the Iranians care if they breach them or not. We now have Iranian ground troops fighting in Syria with Russian Air Support. They are gaining ground and getting the Russians as allies. I doubt even Israel would step in and do anything in Iran.

Charles Hess
Charles Hess (@guest_335152)
8 years ago

What the heck May have breached mean?? Guess because it didn’t have a nuclear warhead and didn’t destroy anything makes a difference?

Art Vandelay
Art Vandelay (@guest_335194)
8 years ago
Reply to  Charles Hess

No worries. US Sec of State Kerry will labor hard to rationalize this, and it won’t even be deemed a technical violation.

Rodney Agnew
Rodney Agnew (@guest_335222)
8 years ago

Obama will let them off the hook.

David Bryant
David Bryant (@guest_335411)
8 years ago

Why am I not surprised