The Royal Navy will not extend the lives of its six Type 45 air-defence destroyers, which are due to begin retiring from 2035, as the service shifts towards a hybrid fleet of crewed and uncrewed vessels under the Defence Investment Plan, Ministry of Defence officials said.

Officials told a briefing on the plan, published on Tuesday and launched by the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and the Defence Secretary at a British drone manufacturer, that the department had decided against prolonging the Type 45s and would instead use the roughly ten years before the class leaves service to stand up the hybrid navy intended to take over the air-defence role, with an additional £1.3 billion going into that effort on top of the more than £7 billion already committed to the Type 26 and Type 31 frigate programmes.

Defence Secretary Dan Jarvis, opening the launch, said the plan put “more money for hybrid Royal Navy,” and one official, describing the change as “a genuinely do different moment” for the fleet, said the department wanted to see the first hybrid vessels appear before the end of the decade rather than waiting until the destroyers had gone.

At the centre of the plan are at least six Common Combat Vessels, the hybrid warships trailed over the weekend that are to act as the hub of a networked air-defence system, supported by a family of uncrewed platforms designated Type 91 to 94 covering tasks that run from carrying missiles to hunting submarines and scanning for air threats, with the Common Combat Vessel taking the place of the planned Type 83 destroyer that has now been dropped. Sir Keir Starmer set out what that would mean in practice when he launched the plan, describing frigates moving to intercept a Russian ship in British waters accompanied by “outriders, uncrewed ships above and below the surface,” their artificial intelligence working in unison with the warships so that the whole group operated as a single integrated force.

The decision not to extend the Type 45s rests on a combination of their age and the cost of holding a small number of complex ships in service, weighed against a judgment that a fleet mixing crewed and uncrewed vessels is better suited to the pace of modern warfare, and although the six destroyers and their Sea Viper missile system have furnished the fleet’s high-end air defence for more than a decade, they have been dogged by propulsion problems and the class has at times struggled to keep enough hulls available for sea.

The obvious risk in the approach is one of timing, because the hybrid vessels meant to succeed them remain at an early stage, with the design and procurement work for the Common Combat Vessel only now beginning, which leaves a full decade across which the transition has to be managed if the Navy is to avoid any gap in its air-defence cover.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

19 COMMENTS

  1. Cant dragon fire be fitted to the new frigates too? As i understand it, but could be wrong. . Are we onky buying 4 Destroyer fits?

  2. They cutting the fleet defence and ABM role to play a PR game with ships numbers that can’t fulfill the requirements. The DIP actually represents 10 billion in cuts. All the armchair experts banging on about new technology were wrong.

    • Wrong how? Did you think this new tech was going to be in service next week? Its called a 10 year plan for a reason.

      • You balthered away nonsense. It’s a 10 billion cut and that’s end of fleet defences. No ABM radars, no ABM missiles, lower radar horizons so they can point at the number of hulls .

    • This is what I was thinking, T45 absolutely will be when they change their mind in 5 years on T83 and can’t deliver it until the mid 2040s, they just won’t announce it now with them just starting to come out of major refits with PIP.

  3. So does this mean that HMS Defender will be the only Type 45 to get upgraded with Sea Ceptor, NSM, etc.? If they are scrapping the Type 45s without replacement will the remaining 5 ships still be upgraded?

  4. The only thing coming out about the DIP so far is a whole lot of getting rid of things either with no replacement at all or plans to “invest” in a replacement. Not a good omen.

  5. I’d wager a tenner they will get extended at some point when the new systems need problems ironed out that causes delays.

    • Not in the budget they can’t. The new ships can’t do fleet defence or ABM because they are too small. They are junking the capability not replacing it

  6. Why dnt we just scrap the whole lot? We could save millions by not having a ministry of defence, army, navy and airforce, within a few days someone will have invaded to steal some of our resources but the civil servants can be happy the Russians are closest. We need ships, we should keep the ships, it’s not impossible, other navies keep hulls for longer periods and upgrade armaments and radar so can we, it’s cheaper, it has to be. This continual cutting of our defences is pathetic. Russia has a gdp a fraction of ours and half a dozen fleets bugger than our navy. France has a similar size geo and can build it’s own planes, Sweden is smaller and builds it’s iwnz Russia is smaller and builds it’s own. Why the fuck do we have a government and civil service so incompetent we can’t even make our own stuff but buy it in from everywhere else leaving us with no manufacturing, no jobs, no tax revenue, no defences that aren’t reliant on other people’s food will, nothing, naked with nothing

  7. They will get extended, they just don’t want to have to plan for it now with them coming out of PIP, they have a while left until it will be needed, so why start committing funds that far away ?
    But new programs never deliver on time and funding priorities change when services get desperate. T45 have plenty of life at the moment and their real replacement (T83) isn’t a priority right now but it’ll be back, SSN-A has a much longer more complex procurement process that needs to be pursued now so it gets priority.

  8. Clearly they will be extended.
    The Hybrid solution will not be operationally effective in the AD role by 2035.
    Unless even that capability is to be ceded.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here