A look at the the cross-party shipbuilding report

5

A look at the All Party Parliamentary Group for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair report.

Based on evidence from experts in the field, the report calls on the Government to ensure domestic yards receive the Fleet Solid Support Ship Contract in order to retain the skills needed to construct, refit and upgrade complex warships in the future. The report states that the industry is already facing significant redundancies as the aircraft carrier programme runs down, with the subsequent loss of leading-edge skills.

Once lost, the report argues, these skills cannot be quickly regained and the UK’s sovereign capability to produce complex warships will suffer accordingly, as will the UK’s ability to project naval power.

The APPG states that “it is the responsibility of the Government to ensure the Royal Navy receives its equipment from a leading-edge supply chain and support structure and is therefore able to maintain its operational advantage”.

The report can be downloaded here but for the sake of brevity, here are the recommendations.

Click to enlarge.

This footage belongs to the UK Defence Journal, for more visit https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk and for enquiries please contact [email protected]

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Expat
Expat
4 years ago

We’ve had government support for shipbuilding for some years in the form of ToBA. What has it actually resulted in? Well BAe have had to partner with a much more efficient yard Cammell Laird to stand any chance of winning a competitive bid on the T31 and in their own yards they have produced some over priced OPVs which required some serious rectification work. Not unrelated to this article it appears that the SSS bidding process is weighted in favour of the UK consortium. From the defensenews site “Fincantieri pulled out originally because the U.K. wanted a proposal based on… Read more »

Peter Shaw
Peter Shaw
4 years ago

These all sound like sensible suggestions. UK government needs to implement them. I would share work between Scotland and England though just in case Scotland decides to go for independence.

Trevor G
Trevor G
4 years ago

With today’s news re Harland & Wolff, Sir John Parker could be forgiven for wondering why he bothered producing his report on shipbuilding strategy. Appledore gone, now H & W following, so two UK yards will have disappeared even before any decisions about orders have been taken by the experts in Whitehall. P*ss up & brewery spring to mind.

Trevor G
Trevor G
4 years ago
Reply to  Trevor G

And now Fergusons….

Martin
Martin
4 years ago

With yards like H&W closed and now Ferguson’s one wonders if the UK has the capacity to build both T31 and FSS, the QEC’s will need a refit taking up Rosyth in the 2020’s.