Home Air F-35 jet conducts test flight with TR-3 configuration

F-35 jet conducts test flight with TR-3 configuration

51
F-35 jet conducts test flight with TR-3 configuration
A U.S. Air Force F-35A.

On January 6th, a developmental test team from the U.S. 461st Flight Test Squadron conducted the inaugural flight of an F-35 aircraft in the Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3) configuration at Edwards Air Force Base in California.

The TR-3 configuration provides the necessary computational capability to support advanced Block 4 features for the F-35, including updated sensor suites, expanded capabilities for long-range precision weapons, enhanced electronic warfare features, advanced data fusion, and increased interoperability with other platforms.

These features will provide pilots with a significant advantage in identifying, tracking, engaging, and surviving against advanced air, ground, and cyber threats.

“This is a significant achievement for the F-35 program”, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Mike Schmidt, program executive officer, F-35 Joint Program Office.

“TR-3 is the F-35’s critical computer processing electronics upgrade that will continue to provide all our pilots with the capability they need to be successful against any adversary. There is still a lot of work to do and I am confident that our industry partners and government team will get the job done.”

The TR-3 program has successfully addressed technical challenges related to hardware and software, and is on track to deliver these capabilities to the United States and its allies starting in 2023.

The government and industry team say here that they continue to work collaboratively to find innovative solutions to ensure the delivery of critical capabilities to counter future threats. Lessons learned from the TR-3 program will be applied across the entire Block 4 modernisation program.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

51 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
1 year ago

Yes as I reported this earlier an important move to Block 4 especially if this set up is indeed incorporated into production aircraft from mid year as has been claimed. Still a long way from Block 4 itself sadly but at least some good news that the new aircraft will be ready for it and a barrier to deliveries about to be removed soon (hopefully).

Tomartyr
Tomartyr
1 year ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Am I right in thinking that updating a tr3 aircraft to B4 is basically just a software update and therefore there’s no reason not to start buying aside from as a bargaining chip against LM? (Meteor integration when?)

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

Pretty much: yes.

The only thing is that computer hardware ages fast. So what is state of the art two years ago (likely time frame) isn’t going to look to amazing by 2030.

I’m sure some of this will have been mitigated by using card based processors and graphics cards but the backplane might still be a limiting factor.

AlexS
AlexS
1 year ago

That is the biggest problem for complex systems like F-35 due to fast technology development.
They are so complex that entropy within is so heavy they can’t be keep updated.
They risk being irrelevant in a war that can be won by simplified assets that can keep up with technology or just replaced inexpensively by comparison..

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor
1 year ago
Reply to  AlexS

As we have seen in the Ukraine this is nonsense. Advanced technology will always beat legacy technologies if used properly. The Ukraine forces are destroying Russian equipment 5/10 to 1.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  OkamsRazor

Agree to a point.

F35B is a bit too much of a fudge. Which is why upgrading three different versions, which have less commonality than hoped for, is a lot slower and takes a lot more effort than was ever envisaged at the start of the program.

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor
1 year ago

One man’s fudge is another man’s Swiss Army knife. As each F35 is best in class the logic of “fudge” eludes me, perhaps we’re working from different dictionaries.

AlexS
AlexS
1 year ago
Reply to  OkamsRazor

So you are comparing a weapon that was not even employed in Ukraine with an enemy that is quite slow to update its equipment regardless of complexity…?

If can’t read you can’t understand what i am saying. Parts of F35 will have devices from more than a decade ago…

AlexS
AlexS
1 year ago
Reply to  AlexS

Another delay for F-35 full rate production – seems this is a fighter that will never be finished and will ever get full rate production go ahead. from defensenews WASHINGTON — The Pentagon’s chief weapons tester fears a crucial test for the F-35 program is in danger of slipping further, perhaps into fiscal 2024. (…) Dan Grazier, a military analyst for the Project on Government Oversight who has been critical of the management of the F-35 program, said the new timetable rules out a full-rate production decision by the end of September — and said calendar year 2024 is a more likely… Read more »

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor
1 year ago
Reply to  AlexS

So the most advanced fighter jet in the sky to date and the most successful production jet of the modern age (2000s) is failing to be even more advanced and even more produced (FRP), so that makes it a failure! This alt universe that you’re living in must be a challenging place, the logic gates must be fearsome.

Joe16
Joe16
1 year ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

My understanding, reading between the lines, was that Meteor was delayed in integration because a) everything BlockIV is delayed and b) because HM Treasury didn’t sign a cheque when they were supposed to. Less than LM dragging their feet for whatever reason.
I may be wrong though, happy to be corrected by someone who knows more on the matter!

Tomartyr
Tomartyr
1 year ago
Reply to  Joe16

Fair, my inner conspiracy theorist suspected Washington preferred Meteor integration after all F-35 customers had already bought American.

Joe16
Joe16
1 year ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

I’m sure they do, I certainly wouldn’t put it past them! I may be completely wrong, and it could easily be a bit of both knowing our government…

simon alexander
simon alexander
1 year ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

however it can about customers wont forget that yanks got their toys on the F35 planes first and leopard tank customers also having thoughts now

Jon
Jon
1 year ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

I’ve read that Tranche 2 will be 26 or 27 planes to arrive between 2026 and 2033. Navy Lookout had 26 in April last year as did UKDJ in September; Breaking Defense had 27 reported in December. Perhaps the extra one includes payment for carrier breakages to give 75. Some of these won’t be capable of operational use, I think there three test frames, leaving 72. If, as has been reported, it’ll cost $27m to upgrade the currently existing 27 planes, that’s £590m for the upgrades. It doesn’t seem too bad to me to upgrade them all. The Treasury’s share… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon

That is unfortunately the issue with the way the cash accounting is done by Treasury – it really is a corner shop level view of finance that would never be tolerated in a large international organisation like Shell or BP there investments take decade(s) to pay back. There is little sense of a virtuous circle of doing something to earn income that at least part of it enables the wheel to turn more. Also, to stretch an analogy beyond breaking point, the diameter of the wheel (in terms of time) is very small. So short term thinking dominates over longer… Read more »

Tomartyr
Tomartyr
1 year ago

It would probably be a smart move to make the Treasurer more like the Speaker instead of swapping them out every five years.

Meirion X
Meirion X
6 months ago
Reply to  Jon

Two new extra squadrons of F-35B, for RN, will require at least 36 airframes, if you include the reseve airframes, stand-by, war-time reseve.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
1 year ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Usually a 3-star does not make such pronouncements, unless he is absolutely certain. Or he holds someone’s chitlins at risk. 😉😁

Robert Blay.
Robert Blay.
1 year ago

This is basically fitting the hardware that will allow Blk 4 to integrate into the aircraft. Blk 4 is a massive upgrade, much larger than the project Centurion upgrade for Typhoon for example. Blk 4 will include the integration of 16 additional weapon types. New Electronic warfare modes, new sensors (AN/APG-85 for example) new weapon modes, further enhanced interoperability with 4th gen platforms, more powerful data fusion and long range integrated kill webs. using data shared from other platforms in the air, on the ground and at sea. Blk 4 is also a series of upgrades following the F35 Continuous… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Robert Blay.
Expat
Expat
1 year ago

The F35 has had bad press about availability rates but it actually turns out that the F35 has had better availability than the other airframes in us inventory.

In 2021, the availability rates of all three fleets of F-35s were higher than those of most of DoD’s other fighters. 

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57842

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Expat

Here’s a fuller and more accurate picture for you Expat. “In their initial years, all three fleets of F-35s exhibited low availability rates, which rose thereafter. The availability of F-35As and F-35Cs declined from 2015 to 2018 but increased in 2019 and 2020. The availability of F-35Bs trended upward through 2020. In 2021, the F-35 fleets had higher availability rates than most of DoD’s other fighters and attack aircraft.4 The F-35 fleets are much newer than those other aircraft, and newer fleets typically have higher availability rates than older ones.” LINK Clearly, that does not include the current ones that… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Robert Blay.
Robert Blay.
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Typically Nigel. Brand new aircraft, especially fast jets, do have lower availability rates when they enter service, because everything is brand new, and experience among engineers and the supply chain is low. It takes time for everyone to get used to the new equipment, and new procedures, especially with somthing as complex as F35. Once the system has matured and experience gained across sqns availability improves. When we received the upgraded Harrier GR9, availability was lower than the GR7 fleet for the same reasons. Maintenance contacts do improve availability across the whole fleet, and can help reduce the dreaded fleet… Read more »

Expat
Expat
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert Blay.

The F35 is also getting upgrades much earlier than other jets which is dragging the average down. New jets don’t normally face this so early.
So it’s not really an apples with apples comparison to legacy jets and as the CBO state the newer F35s will not need to go through these upgrades and will have higher availability.as you expect.

Robert Blay.
Robert Blay.
1 year ago
Reply to  Expat

Exactly mate. F35 is unlike anything that has entered service before. It also comes more war ready than any fast jet before it. Take the Electro optical targeting system. This would be an external pod on all other fast jets, Sniper pod ect. These have to be integrated and that takes time. AESA Radar, defence aids, Hemlet mounted display, datalinks, stealth ect are all on the jet from day one. It’s taken Typhoon 20 years to get to the capability it has today, and it still has a lot of development to come. F35 will be able to incorporate many… Read more »

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert Blay.

Tornado started with concrete in its nose instead of radar 😀

AlexS
AlexS
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Not true. Tornado always had the Texas Instruments radar.

It was the latter Tornado fighter – model for the RAF only – that had the concrete to replace the non ready Foxhunter.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
1 year ago
Reply to  AlexS

I think he meant the ADV version, which indeed were known as “Blue Circle” at the time after the cement.

Robert Blay
Robert Blay
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Think only a handful of early Tornado F2’s had the concrete ballast.

Andrew
Andrew
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Ahh, I think it was referred to as the blue circle radar system if memory serves me right!

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert Blay.

Typically spare parts on new aircraft is the issue. Not enough time to build up inventory and small fleets so no scavenging opportunities.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert Blay.

👍

Expat
Expat
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

And it also states the F35 availability is lower due to the upgrade program and the newer airframes won’t need this. So the reality is the availability average is being dragged down by the upgrade program so those countries buying now will be getting an even better average availability.

And the other good news is since 2018 rates have improved even with increased numbers of airframes delivered and covid. Both of which should have stressed the F35 supply chain and maintenance facilities which doesn’t appear to have happened.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

And as for Mr Blay the man who tells Porkies in a very poor attempt to twist the facts to suit his own agenda. CAUGHT RED HANDED Robert Blay January 15 2023 19:43 “I think this article explains it in plain enough English for you Nigel from a reputable website. I know you love a link. Or do you still think 6th gen will be available from 2025? that was a cracker of a prediction.”   REPLY No doubt the clown in the room didn’t read my post on UKDJ fifteen days ago regarding Tempest and makes a complete fool of… Read more »

Robert Blay.
Robert Blay.
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Is that the best you got Nigel? Or is it the only reply your computer program can up with? Keep digging that hole for yourself. How’s Moscow in January, I hope they are paying you well for this child like F35 trash talk. 👍🇷🇺 Comrade Collins has a certain ring to it don’t you think 😄

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

No On Likes A Proven Lier Mr Blay.

As for your endless Childish comments, STAY OF THE WHITE WINE you sound like a complete idiot.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

🥱

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Sean

😴

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

It was only a matter of time before you bored yourself to sleep 🤷🏻‍♂️

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Brand New Aircraft 😂 “The F-35 first flew in 2006″ 10 Jan 2023 “In fact, delays and technical problems with the TR-3 account for a $330 million increase in the F-35’s development costs, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office. Development of Block 4 is now three years late and will continue until 2029, the GAO said in April 2022.” What was his recent comment regarding the Pilots And Maintenance crews 😂 More horse 💩 to create he’s in the know when he actually knows very little! Downtime problems “Generally speaking, the F-35 is also the bête noire (a person… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

😴

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Sean

😴

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
AlexS
AlexS
1 year ago
Reply to  Expat

It also depends in what aircraft the air force gives makes priority to be available.

Expat
Expat
1 year ago
Reply to  AlexS

True and the flying hours which will drive down availability.

AlexS
AlexS
1 year ago
Reply to  Expat

Agreed.

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  Expat

True but US availability rates are pretty Low due to legacy aircraft and maintenance hogs like F22 and B2. Would be interesting to see UK rates verses Typhoon.

Esteban
Esteban
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Typhoon is obsolete… And you have no idea what the actual US availability rates are.

Jon
Jon
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Perhaps you would care to explain why you think Typhoon is obsolete, despite obvious evidence to the contrary, such as recent orders, hot production lines and further upgrades in the offing.

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon

Because he is a complete idiot who believes every thing he reads and then puts his own spin on it🙄

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Oh dear, wrong and angry again. So sad.

Expat
Expat
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Hawk t2 rates are very low due to the engine issues the Typhoon is around 60-70% which is similar to the US and is the normal for fast jets. The UKs c130s are lower than the a400.now its engine issues are resolved and sit around 65-70%.