HMS Audacious, the fourth of seven Astute-class attack submarines being built by BAE Systems for the Royal Navy, set sail from Barrow-in-Furness for the first time on the 6th of April. 

BAE say that new ways of working and amended protocols have been introduced at the site, in line with Government guidelines, “to enable a small team of employees to provide vital support to the Royal Navy ahead of the boat’s departure, while protecting their health and wellbeing”.

The submarine was guided into open water for the first time before setting off on her inaugural journey to Her Majesty’s Naval Base Clyde, say the firm.

Audacious Under Construction MOD 45155779.jpg
Astute Class submarine Audacious under construction at Barrow in Furness shipyard in Cumbria.

Cliff Robson, Managing Director of BAE Systems Submarines, said:

“This is an incredibly difficult time for employees, their families and the community but, as is often the case in times of great adversity, it has been truly humbling to see everyone come together to support the Government’s critical defence programmes and help deliver HMS Audacious.”

Ian Booth, Chief Executive of the Submarine Delivery Agency, said:

“The departure of HMS Audacious from Barrow is a key milestone in the Astute Class programme. The delivery of our incredibly complex submarine programmes depends on the extremely skilled submarine workforce and close collaboration with our industrial partners across the supply chain to deliver a first class product for the Royal Navy. I am extremely grateful to everyone involved in the significant efforts to meet this milestone and the key roles they have played in the shadow of these unprecedented circumstances to get HMS Audacious to sea.”

Image
Image via BAE Systems.

The boat’s departure comes days after the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Defence, Sir Stephen Lovegrove, thanked the defence industry for its efforts to continue to deliver critical and nationally important defence operations and programmes during the difficult and unprecedented times the country is facing.

As SaveTheRoyalNavy.org reported in October last year, the boat has suffered issues with delays and a revised delivery schedule was delayed. Their article is well worth reading for an indepth look at the delays.

“HMS Audacious is in effect a ‘batch II’ boat with some significant internal changes from the first 3 boats and there is a long and complex legacy of political and industrial mistakes that have affected the Astute programme.”

The Royal Navy say that the 97 metre, 7,400-tonne Astute-class submarines are the most capable submarines ever built for the Royal Navy. The first three submarines, HMS Astute, HMS Ambush and HMS Artful are in service, while the final three Astute-class are at various stages of construction at Barrow.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

59 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andy P
Andy P
3 years ago

About bloody time.

Rob Collinson
Rob Collinson
3 years ago

Yipeeeeeee

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
3 years ago

Good news. Best wishes to Audacious and families.

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago

What your benefits? Yep we agree.

HF
HF
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I disagree with him completely but why do you have to make the benefit remark ? Do you actually know he’s on benefits and why, or is it just a standard slur ?

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  HF

Why? Why not? He is a troll and I find his churlish comments and answers amusing. Can I ask are you the reply police?

HF
HF
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Because your answer doesn’t challenge him. Ignore him if he’s a troll, ask him why he thinks that (probably a waste of time), or give him a short answer that doesn’t involve a cheap stereotype. If you post a public forum you have to accept that perhaps your comments may receive a challenge otherwise we might as well not bother.

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  HF

Alas you are correct, I have had this discussion with Danielle a time or two, I have a habit of identifying a typical troll and then baiting him, mostly on technical issues although on occasion other areas, as I like to see them be totally unable to justify their usual piffle or rant. Should I stop, yep, should I be more mature, of course, can I stop, probably not as the fools do amuse me lol. Cheers and stay safe.

HF
HF
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Fair enough – as I said, I disagree with him completely. Stay safe and hopefully we’ll talk again.

Helions
Helions
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Hey! Let me try! Ummmmm…. I TOTALLY disagree with this program due to the fact that it’s a waste of money that could better be spent on designer RN uniforms from… Uhhh.. POSH SPICE… yeah… That’s it…

Cheers.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
3 years ago
Reply to  Helions

HI Helions,

That made me laugh – thanks 🙂

Stay Safe mate, and everyone else – even the trolls.

Cheers CR

DaveyB
DaveyB
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I guess landing on ones head too many times doesn’t help – lol. Nothing wrong with a bit of banter if you know what I mean…

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  DaveyB

Who me or Harold! Had a few crappy landings to be sure, feet, knees, chin!!! Followed by lots of fucks!!!!!!!! And a left ankle in a rabbit hole, as I try to do a PLF to the right and yep….snap! Thinking about it my head would have been the best place ? Stay safe!

DaveyB
DaveyB
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I remember my first static line jump. Like a muppet, I closed my eyes just after taking that first big step, when going through the door. I consequently tumbled causing the lines to twist. Lots of kicking and swinging to unbind them. Must be mad, as it didn’t stop me progressing on to free fall and then on to the para-wings.

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

And there you go….repeated troll behaviour. Anyway as I have asked prior, please give us a run down on your concept of operations, TTPs, formation strengths etc of your long called for and oft repeated demand for a purely Defence force. Take this as an opportunity to show you are not a troll.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Don’t waste your time my friend.

julian1
julian1
3 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I would argue that you couldn’t have an effective defence force without such submarines

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  julian1

Correct mate but such considerations are beyond the scope of Harold and his ability to be proud of his ignorance.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago

Hope the rest of the batch 2’s speed up now with lessons learned.

The Battleships of the modern RN.

HF
HF
3 years ago

Always the way with a new class – lessons are learned from the early vessels.

Andy P
Andy P
3 years ago
Reply to  HF

I know these are a sort of ‘batch 2’ but the lessons were supposed to be learned from Astute itself. This delay is pretty poor considering we took long enough to get the Astute build going. We ran the S and T’s ragged to keep the Fleet boat numbers up only for this delay, its pretty poor that we’ve only got the first 3 in and they were delayed.

Paul T
Paul T
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy P

Im curious to know what differences their are compared to the first three but presume that information is not for public consumption.If its a case of short term pain for long term gain then the delays make sense,but as you say the Astute Build was problematic from the start,seems a bit risky too add more hiccups.

Pacman27
Pacman27
3 years ago

Hi Harold

Can you provide some facts to support this statement please

HF
HF
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

He’ll come up with some specious half arsed rubbish.

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

Is that the best depth of knowledge answer you can give? Wow!

David Flandry
David Flandry
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

He betrays his ignorance.

Pacman27
Pacman27
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

Harold

We need submarines as part of a balanced response to defend our country and maintain our democracy.

The NHS spend £3bn per week and that is an eye watering amount of money, but is not particularly efficient.

Whilst I admire the staff, throwing more money at the NHS is not necessarily the answer.

Also why does it have to be at the expense of a nuclear submarine that would only fund the NHS for 1 week as opposed to getting 25 years with of service.

short sighted my friend

DaveyB
DaveyB
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

Why should the NHS get any more money? Seriously though, the NHS gets just under 10% of the UK’s GDP, defence by contrast is just under 2% (according to the NAO). The NHS has become a crutch for society, who are mostly too ignorant or lazy to look after themselves in a healthy or beneficial lifestyle. It’s the same with schools, because the state provides, people take it for granted, therefore don’t invest in them and I don’t mean financially. A large minority of parents basically offload responsibility on to schools, expecting them to develop the necessary social and etiquette… Read more »

Andy
Andy
3 years ago
Reply to  DaveyB

The NHS actually consumes 28% of public spending and 10% of GDP . We actually spend 1.6% of GDP on defence . In 2001 we spent 25 billion on defence in 2019 we spent 40 billion on defence In 2001 we spent 39 billion on the NHS in 2019 we spent 158 billion. The NHS employs 1.7 million people and another 462,758 through local authorities but pays the wages . It is the 3 rd largest employer in the world or 2 if you add the 462,758 indirectly employed a massive 36% of its budget is spent on wages and… Read more »

Murray
Murray
3 years ago
Reply to  DaveyB

‘The NHS has become a crutch for society, who are mostly too ignorant or lazy to look after themselves in a healthy or beneficial lifestyle’

And here I was only *partially* expecting quasi-eugenics nonsense to appear on this site, in the comments.

julian1
julian1
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

A huge sum of money in spent on health and rightly so. A tiny amount of money is spent on defence and there is really nothing to cut any further. If you want facts look at defence vs health spending in the 1970s for each decade. Health spending increases, defence spending reduces.
I can’t see the point of your postings

Meirion X
Meirion X
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

The SSN’s of today, are the equivalent of the great battleships of the past!

Please learn some history!

john melling
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

I guess the £140.4 billion 2019\20 healthcare budget is not enough for you!
And it still can’t to the basics
The NHS has been a mess for decades! Its got no organisation
And as we are seeing with the COVID outbreak thanks to your Chinese Commie pals, its overwhelmed.
As for “dealing with the real threats”.. like yourself for instance?

Meirion X
Meirion X
3 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

Troll H’s style seems very much like
that G commentator who writes anti militarist Tosh articles!

Trevor
Trevor
3 years ago

Worrying, Boris is in intensive care.
Leaving aside personal concerns, which should not be ignored, the socio strategic economic future of the country is on a cusp.

Mark B
Mark B
3 years ago
Reply to  Trevor

True Trevor I couldn’t agree more. He had managed to unite the Government, politicians & most of the public in a strategy to defeat this disease. It is a long time since a British leader got up close and personal with an enemy of the state. I hope he prevails.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark B

Hi Mark B, I was no fan of Boris, but he has stepped up when the country needed him the most. He has on the whole impressed me during this emergency and regardless, to have the leader of the Government down at such a crucial moment is bad news. We will soon see how robust our Cabinet style of Government is. Given the speed of events – it is only about 3 weeks since the number of cases started to ramp up in the UK – it will be tough for Dominic Raab to step into Boris’ shoes and get… Read more »

Mark B
Mark B
3 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

ChariotRider I suspect Dominic may have an easier task following Boris than a more detailed person like Teresa May. Boris set the tone of Government with broad confident policies and then seemed to let people get on with them. If that was true we should see things continue as normal with Raab scanning the detail allowing Boris to remain the figurehead in control. Assuming this is the case we should see little change but if I’m wrong everything may come tumbling down.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark B

Hi Mark B, What you say is true prior to the crisis, but recent reports suggest that Boris Johnson has stepped up and taken responsibility for the final key decisions. So I think there has been a change in style when the chips are down. The phrase being used is ‘first amongst equals’. The upside is that all key immediate decisions are reported as being made, so hopefully the PM will be fully recovered before the next wave of decisions will need to be made, as much for his sake and his family’s as for the country’s. Not because I… Read more »

Mark B
Mark B
3 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Hi ChariotRider, I agree Boris has stepped up and made the key decisions. I got the impression that his cabinet were full of like-minded people and I have not seen any sign of dissent. Perhaps everyone is onboard – we will see. Dominic looked a little daunted by the big chair but possibly that will fade – he will not have time to dwell on it. It is in my humble opinion too soon to predict the PM return to good health. The next 3-4 days are key but it looks like a better than even chance for him. I… Read more »

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark B

I agree the next 3-4 days are key. I was very relieved to hear Boris was ‘stable’ this morning when I watched the news, for him and his family, but for the country as well.

Best wishes one and all.

CR

Andy
Andy
3 years ago

Fantastic news, but are these yesterdays technology already?

Andy
Andy
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy

For the price of a single Astute we could have 32 of these.. https://news.usni.org/2019/04/17/u-k-developing-its-own-xluuv-for-royal-navy

Andy
Andy
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Actually, it’s 128!

Ulya
Ulya
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy

I had read this article before Andy, 128 of these teamed up with your Poseidon aircraft and maybe ground based cruise missiles could be very effective area control. 3,000 nautical miles, would that be enough to cover much of your North sea area of interest though?

Andy
Andy
3 years ago
Reply to  Ulya

Well Ulya, it might very well be enough, unfortunately if that is the case we would probably only order about 16!

It’s great to have you in this forum. Always nice to hear another perspective.

Andy
Andy
3 years ago
Reply to  Ulya
Ulya
Ulya
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Thank you for the link, interesting article, and for your kind words Andy, but I think you are in very small club ?

Ethan
Ethan
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Well of course they are ‘yesterdays’ technology, because ‘today’s’ technology is being built and tested and ‘tomorrow’s’ technology doesn’t exist yet. Not to mention future boats will be updated as technology advances.

Helions
Helions
3 years ago

Glad to see the builder’s issues seem to have been overcome and the program is delivering badly needed boats to the RN. I’m also glad the George VI has finally had a (capital) fleet unit named in his honor.

Cheers and stay healthy all

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
3 years ago
Reply to  Helions

Yeh, George VI played a significant role in the UK’s WWII war effort, so about time he was recognised…

Alan Reid
Alan Reid
3 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Yes, it will be great to have a KGVI in the fleet. What a cool name!

julian1
julian1
3 years ago

Could the first 3 boats be brought up to the same standard/configuration as the last 4? Will that happen at the first major refit. With a class so small, it takes half the boats being built to achieve the “optimum”

Mike
Mike
3 years ago

What does ‘national defence’ mean in a pandemic? It’s no time to buy fighter jets

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/08/national-defence-corona-pandemic-fighter-jets

🙂

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Guardian.

Airborne
Airborne
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike

You’ve cut and pasted that crap twice, damn you aren’t just sad you are lazy!

The Artist Formerly known as Los Pollos Chicken
The Artist Formerly known as Los Pollos Chicken
3 years ago

Harry come on man this disdain towards house insurance and critical illness insurances isn’t the way to go you’ll end up regretting it when your boiler packs up it’s already 16 yrs old .look how your trying to drive your Escort around town without insurance ended up ? A big fine and points your mrs was none to pleased with you for that one. No no Defence is just like those policies you shun always a waste of money until you need it .

arcad2000
3 years ago

Video review of HMS Audacious sea voyage in Russian!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P70c1dewm1s

Dean Jones
Dean Jones
3 years ago

How will the submarine be tested prior to being handed over to the RN