The Royal Navy say that this is the most powerful task force assembled by any European Navy in almost 20 years.
The new HMS Queen Elizabeth Carrier Strike Group has assembled for the first time with the aircraft carrier leading a flotilla of destroyers and frigates from the UK, US and the Netherlands, together with two Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels.

Commander of the UK Carrier Strike Group,Commodore Steve Moorhouse, was quoted as saying that this represents “a comprehensive, cohesive Carrier Strike Group with a sovereign British core, but US & Dutch partners integrated throughout & additional capabilities as required. Ready to fight together on & under the sea, in the air, over the land & in cyberspace”.
Commodore Steve Moorhouse also said:
“The new UK Carrier Strike Group is the embodiment of British maritime power, and sits at the heart of a modernised and emboldened Royal Navy. Protected by a ring of advanced destroyers, frigates, helicopters and submarines, and equipped with fifth generation fighters, HMS Queen Elizabeth is able to strike from the sea at a time and place of our choosing; and with our NATO allies at our side, we will be ready to fight and win in the most demanding circumstances. Carrier Strike offers Britain choice and flexibility on the global stage; it reassures our friends and allies and presents a powerful deterrent to would-be adversaries.”
HMS Queen Elizabeth and her Strike Group are currently exercising alongside allied nations in the North Sea, as part of NATO’s largest annual exercise, Joint Warrior.
They’re right. Closest comparison would be the lone French CSG, but with the shortcomings the Rafale has vis-a-vis the F-35 as revealed in Red Flag, the general poor capabilities of Rubis class subs and the piss poor logistical capabilities of the Marine Nationale, there’s no question the QE CSG is more powerful than anything they could rustle together. Only advantage they have is in fixed wing AWACs
I am not going to play the envious French man in this very patriotic conversation but I just notice that the QE is just making circles in the North Sea. If I were you I would wait a little before taking jabs at other navies. The 5th generation jets have not been tested in any meaningful military operation. They can’t fly during a storm! I bant help bit notice that they are only 15 jets on that deck and there are more American jets than British ones.
I appreciate your support in Mali (where we do the fighting). I thank you for that by the way. Just to be clear, that comment about the Rubis class subs is devoid of any truth. Honestly, I would not be boasting about any military capability that has not been developed independently. I don’t know how a rafale would behave in a one-to-one situation with a F35. I am no pilot and no expert but I know that rafale behaves admirably in Syria, in Iraq.
Down the line, when the QE and the Prince of Wales are ready to be deployed, I might change my tune. Since then, I’ll wait for the UK to actually send its carrier battle group in a combat mission not just as representation of some past glory. As a French person I am damn proud on my country’s navy and its flagship the Charles de Gaulle carrier.
Utter nonesense.
– Rafale has never faced F35 in any red flag. In fact F35 was on same team as F35, Typhoon, F15, F22, AWACS etc.. vs older versions of F16 C and D models. In fact the kill ratios are not attributable to a specific aircraft (certainly not the F35 alone who does not even carry that many missiles) since they were all working as a team
It is the F35 that has not lived to expectations, which is clear from GAO and DoT&E reports, the fact that USAF is modernizing and ordering new F15, the navy doing the same with new orders of F18 Advanced Super Hornets (while delaying orders of F35C) and all this at the same time the US is working on NGAD for its next fighters, it wants by the end of this decade
– Rubis class is a very good sub and has sunk entire US carrier groups duting exercices. In 1998 the Casabianca sank the Eisenhower strike group (Pean exercise), and in 2015 the Saphyr sank the Roosevelt strike group (Comptuex exercise). And Rubis class is being replaced by brand new Barracuda class which is finishing its sea trials this year!
– What piss poor logistics of the Marine are you reffering to! There are 3 Mistral class and 4 Durance class supply ships (new Vulcano class is currently being built to start to replace them in 2022)
Please spare me tye nonesense. CDG has AWACS Hawkeyes (no crowsnest Merlins available yet), CATOBAR for better payload, buddy refuel for extended ranges, 40+ Rafale M (vs less than 20 F35 who have no cryise missile or anti ship capability to this day) and does not need to resupply as often since nuclear powered.
French military budget next year will increase by 5% despite Covid, this has just been confirmed in latest LPM. Meanwhile UK forces are facing a review and many cuts are rumored. Dont let Brexit and global Britain go to your head
Oh and i almost forget the abysmal operational rate of the Type 45 over the last 5 years as per a recent article on this site. T45 was launched over a decade ago and engines are still major problem. Meanwhile CDG has Fremm and Horizon class escort.
You make some valid points however I’m afraid no nation has ever managed to have every single newly designed piece of hardware go from design to production to operational capability without any hitches or set backs the frenchies included. The lamentable issues involved with the CDG which was built with its flight deck 14 m too short and it’s main rudder falling to bits after only a few years are just 1 example of how not to do something.
The F35 is undoubtedly going to be far superior to any gen 4.5 aircraft in production when fully up to speed but that’s just it it’s new so of course weapons integration and performance are going to take time. All the reports I’ve read by those who have actually flown the F35 proclaim it to be outstanding. Half the ?it’s capable of will never have been released to joe blow ore any causal punters.
You know as I’ve mentioned before back in the day the naysayers were slating the AH64 and A10 as being crap , useless and not up to the job because they had difficult introductions and look at them now both the premier tank killing weapons platforms on the planet.
War games are not war so no US task groups have been sunk by any french subs. a training environment is not the same as the real thing in any way shape or form. Until France goes to war with a peer enemy then how good a Rubis class sub is is just speculation.
The Barracuda class is not operational and until it is (just because they project sea trials ending this year doesn’t mean they will) then it’s just an untested piece of kit. Even if the trials are concluded successfully doesn’t meant problems won’t be identified down the line.
Bringing new weapons systems online whether aircraft , subs, or ships is a lengthy and complex task and the U.K. carrier strike capability is only in its infancy however that said as long as the gov put the money in then bet your last euro it will kick ass.
As for U.K. cuts your right just rumour because that’s all the media and U.K. haters ever want to do is well hate on anything we do and sow the seeds of mischief and doubt.
There’s no need for anyone’s panties to be getting all twisted about crows nest , ASM’s etc etc all work in progress .The UK cannot be beat and this nation will always come up Trump 2020 it’s in our DNA ?? Covid19 20 or 21 nothing stops HM armed forces ?????????
What BS. The ramp was not too short, it was designed for Rafale. However at a later date France decided to get US Hawkeyes since it was deemed too expensive to develop a french alternative for so few planes and 0 export market. The Hawkeye needed a longer deck and this was done before the ship did sea trials. And the propeller broke during sea trials and before it was IOC. That was resolved ages ago. The QE also has had its mishaps, like pipe burst flooding multiple decks with 200 tons of water, smoke stacks spitting out chuncks on the deck making air ops dangerous for fear of getting in jet intakes. So pot calling the kettle black
Keep drinking the kool aid, the F35 is a failure, the US is never going to procure as many as planned and it will have the NGAD replacement in the next decade. In fact the UK will never order 138 F35
Funny that you are so critical of the CDG for having a short deck and propeller issue which were resolved ages ago, yet you are willing to completely overlook the tons of problems the F35 still has after so many years after the JSF program started 27 years ago. It is still work in progress! (13 are class 1 issues, ALIS is dumped and they have started over with ODIN, block 4 is delayed to 2026 at earliest, airframes life expectancy is well under previsions -> 2100 hours for F35B instead of expected 8000h, recently Dutch F35 had to stop operation in thundertsorm, etc…).
All this chest thumping in this article, yet only 4 UK planes on deck the rest are USMC jets. ?
Cope
Whilst its impossible to compare the f35 to the Rafale, as they have never gone up against each other in a real conflict (even red flag events are not a good comparison as they have too many limitations imposed), i would guess the f35 with its stealth would have the edge considering the age of the dog fight is probably gone and beyond visual range is the plan. As such it comes down to who sees who first on radar.
I am curious, what is the biggest french task force around its carrier in European waters, i would have thought similar sized with ally escorts in some form of exercise like this?
Clearly this is a photo op and won’t really be repeated outside a serious war, as we just don’t have enough ships to keep 4 of them with the carrier.
It is however an impressive sight. Hopefully in future we will see a combined task force with our French allies. Two non US carriers and escorts would be pretty impressive sight.
Nah man you completely missing my point which is defence programs do not go from paper to operation just like that. there are issue that usually take years to resolve. Raffle a 1980’s concept that began way back just like the Eurofighter and every other gen 4 fighter etc etc. So what you are spouting about the F35 is kinda premature and dare I say OTT negative . If it turns out to be half as good as the F16 which started its journey 40 years ago then it will be a winner??
The CDG issue was a result of poor planning with the deck . Propeller falling to bits so early on is no different to QE springing a wee leak or 2 again everybody has these issues.
My point was your medicament induced poo poo of the F35 in particular is just plain doomsday wishful thinking.
I think it’s 6 U.K. jets on board QE not 4 but happy to be corrected
As far as the rest of your predictions when crystal balls go on sale then maybe ? remember AH64 Apache ………..
Anyhoos round these parts we drink IRN BRU cos it’s made from girders this Americana Kool aid you speak of is weak as dish water and I wouldn’t touch it
HMS QE and the task force top drawer ???????????
Lol, I remember the advert as a kid.
“Iron Bru…..made in Scotland, by Girders! “
Gen X my man Gen X ??? We are the last of the premier generations. Half wit city from here on in ????????????
Block 4 has Not been delayed! Block 4 capabilities are being introduced right now, in increments of 6 monthly intervals. What has been delayed, is just the completion date.
Task force comprises:
HMS Queen Elizabeth: Queen Elizabeth class Aircraft carrier.
HMS Diamond: Type 45 class Destroyer
HMS Defender: Type 45 class Destroyer
HMS Northumberland: Type 23 class frigate
HMS Kent: Type 23 class frigate
USS The Sullivans: Arleigh Burke-class Aegis guided missile destroyer.
HNLMS Evertsen: De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate
RFA Tideforce: Tide-class replenishment tanker
RFA FortVictoria: Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment ship
I think there’s an RN sub with them too. Suffice to say, I don’t expect to see any photos of QE taken from underwater as it wouldn’t fit with the vibe.
If there is a UK boat operating with them, it wouldn’t surprise me if there has been an ‘underwater look’.
I bet the French are a tad envious.? And many with-in the USN would quite fancy a carrier designed from the keel up to operate the F35. A true 5th gen aircraft carrier, for a 5th gen aircraft. Fantastic ????? And this is still only the very beginning of carrier strike, 10 years down the line, we will be doing things we have barely scratched the surface today, with this combination of vessel and aircraft and the rapid development both will undergo over the next few years.
Nice to see the Brits back in the power projection game.
The US already has two aircraft carriers in production designed from the keel up to operate the F-35 – USS Gerald Ford and USS John F Kennedy.
The RN have beaten the USN in that race! The USS Gerald Ford is not due to be operational until 2022. And USS John F Kennedy about 2024?
Read the statement I was responding to without a knee jerk response. FYI, the USS Carl Vinson is currently undergoing carrier qualifications for the F-35C. The Vinson was not designed from the keel up for the F-35 but was modified to handle it.
That is true, but they cost about 4 times more than 2 QE class vessels.
And 20 times more lethal and 50 times more survivable.
20 times? Are you sure? And how exactly are they more survivable.
What a proud day! 10 years without carrier strike and now we are back!
Great sight. I am glad to see us working with the Dutch and Americans. However. I’d love to see some proper cooperation with the French one day.
This assertion cannot be true in light of the fact that the French nuclear carrier Charles Dr Gaulle regularly forms up with similar sized national and NATO escorts which sometimes includes USN escorts.
Maybe it’s equally the most powerful group then?
I’m not knowledgeable enough on French vessel capabilities to comment much, and it depends how does one define powerful.
I read our SSN is superior and the RN has greater numbers of high end AAW escorts, as well as the best ASW Frigates with the 2087 Merlin combination. We also have logistical reach they lack, and of course F35 stealth aircraft.
The French have fixed wing AEW, and I assume their escorts are not short of ASM. Their carrier is nuclear, but they have but one, where’s we have two so we can always generate this capability.
Swings and roundabouts. I’m happy with the statement made, but I’m biased for my country, so why not.
The French Carrier as far as I can ascertain never sails with less than 18 Rafale Fighter jets. I am almost certain that the carrier like the US Carriers who have nuclear weapons on board. So the strike power of the French carrier group would be greater than the Queen Elizabeth group because the Rafale carries a greater conventional ordinance load than the F35B plus the fact that it can also when called on deliver a nuclear load. Currently, I don’t believe the UK F35Bs are cleared to carry nuclear weapons and they certainly carry less of conventional ordinance, when fully loaded, than the Rafale.
Off course another way to look at the claim rather than in terms of Strike Power or number of vessels in the group that I have described above is in terms of tonnage. In the case then the claim of being the most powerful would probably be correct as the UK carrier is certainly much larger and heavier than the French carrier, with the asumption that the escorts of either group are about the same in tonnage (UK submarines are obvious larger and heavier than French boats but French FREEM frigates are larger and heavier than the T-23 frigates while the Horizon destroyers are about same size at the T-45s, maybe a tad smaller in weight.
True that. At the moment F35 carries sod all really apart from P IV and AAM.
Paveway 4 is a very capable weapon. And the Rafale has been in service a lot longer then F35. Spear 3 will be game changer once integrated in a few years time.
Rafales don’t have the all Important first night of war capability. F35 brings that capability to the RAF/RN.
It would be interesting to compare their expected sorties per day but I can’t find but on the CDG bar what she averaged in Afghanistan and Libya (I think it was 13-14 per day, but hardly air intense environments). Do I remember HMS QE’s being around 75 per day?
This is a truly impressive sight, and one that’s been long overdue! Its great to see us back in the carrier game, all we need to do now is get Crowsnest working correctly, increase our numbers of F35Bs and get our new Frigates built and in service with up to date weapns systems, and get a decent SSM on our existing escorts – from what I can see neitherbof the 45s or 23s have Harpoon fitted? I sincerely hope we are not going to send thatcgrouo into the South China Sea without any SSMs?
Just saw this ! A unmanned drone found in UK waters not far from nuclear sub base!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2020/10/05/mystery-wave-glider-unmanned-vessel-washes-up-on-scottish-island/
Intriguing.
Yes! The article seems to suggest a Russian origin. I am no expert but this drone seems very small and i doubt how much spying it could actually do? probably trying to track the subs departure routes and maybe serve as a relay to other assets better equipped for surveillance in open waters?
Either way it is disturbing, since subs are critical to the nuclear deterrent. I guess this is nothing new to the Royal Navy. Such games happened during the Cold War so the Royal Navy takes appropriate precautions when launching a sub.
That is all secret, rightly. Whatever Russia may or may not be doing, the west ( usually RN/USN ) concerning submarine ops up north ) will be doing the same.
No, it doesn’t. It suggests a US origin but states it may be Russian simply because Russia had made their own sub and that being Russian could explain why it hasn’t been claimed yet.
It’s not like the US is innocent of spying on its allies
It’s 100 miles away to be fair
Hello
Brilliant to see the awsesome F35 going from strength to strength, by far the world’s most lethal 5th gen combat aircraft in existence, nothing else comes close.