The UK has provided extensive military support, including missiles, drones, tanks, artillery, and munitions, here are the specifics.

The information came to light following a written Parliamentary question asked by John Healey MP, the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence.

Leo Docherty MP stated:

“The UK’s support to Ukraine has been and will remain steadfast and we have just announced our largest ever military aid package, which will be delivered over the next few months.

Since February 2022, we have delivered the following key capabilities. For operational security reasons we are unable to publish the full extent of the information requested. The announcement made by the Prime Minister on Tuesday 23 April is additional to the list below.

· 1,800 air defence missiles

· Over 4,000 drones including:

· Long range attack drones

· Strategic Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS)

· Storm Shadow cruise missiles

· Squadron of 14 Challenger 2 Tanks with thousands of rounds of ammunition, plus armoured recovery and repair vehicles.

· 50 AS90 self-propelled 155mm guns hundreds of armoured and protected vehicles.

· 400,000 rounds of artillery ammunition

· 6 Stormer vehicles fitted with Starstreak launchers

· Thousands of surface-to-air missiles including HMV Starstreak, LMM Martlet, ASRAAM, AMRAAM and others.

· More than 10,000 anti-tank weapons (including over 5,000 Next Generation Light Anti-Tank [NLAW] missiles, Javelin, Brimstone and others)

· Nearly 6 million rounds of small arms ammunition, 2,600 anti-structure munitions and 4.5 tonnes of plastic explosive

· More than a hundred anti-aircraft guns, self-propelled artillery.

· Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS)

· 6 stormer air defence vehicles, using HVM Starstreak missiles.

· Counter-battery radar systems

· Communications equipment

· Electronic warfare equipment

· Medical equipment

· 3 Sea King helicopters

· 140 logisitics vehicles

· 1,000 VALLON metal detectors and 100 bomb de-arming kits

· 300 Armoured and protected mobility vehicles

· Cold weather equipment

· Body armour and helmets

· Electricity Generators”

The announcement referee to above in April will also see the following donated.

  • 60 boats including offshore raiding craft, rigid raiding craft and dive boats as well as maritime guns
  • More than 1,600 strike and air defence missiles, as well as additional Storm Shadow long-range precision-guided missiles.
  • More than 400 vehicles, including 160 protected mobility ‘Husky’ vehicles, 162 armoured vehicles and 78 all-terrain vehicles.
  • Nearly 4 million rounds of small arms ammunition.
Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

37 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_815194)
16 days ago

That’s quite a list. Clearly we are buying stuff on the international arms market as well as supplying from our own stocks. The stand out item in that regard is the self propelled AA artillery. I can’t think of a SP AA system in UK service in the last 40 years, if ever? Mobile SAM’s yes, guns, na nothing springing to mind. It also looks as if we have supplied quite a bit of ammunition, but I guess that’s all gone as modern guns, especially self propelled guns, can fire off huge amounts of ammunition daily. To illustrate, the new… Read more »

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_815202)
16 days ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Ukraine have spent much time depleating the black sea fleet and Russian air assets – that in my view is their route to victory. Russia seems to almost want to wear out Ukraine by allowing them to annilalate their never ending supply of cannon fodder. Not a tactic any self-respecting western nation would try but we are talking about Putin now. Victory at any cost.

Last edited 16 days ago by Mark B
ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_815237)
16 days ago
Reply to  Mark B

Hi Mark B, This could be a very interesting and old discussion 🙂 Bomber Harris believed he could bomb Germany into submission during WW2, and whilst the Western Allied bombing offensive drew off huge numbers of German artillery (the Germans used AA guns as general artillery when needed), men and aircraft, it was the advance of the Red Army and the allies that defeated Germany. In short, boots on the ground, or the threat of boots on the ground, that determines the outcome of a war. Although, in the real world things can be rather more gray than that statement… Read more »

George
George (@guest_815427)
15 days ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Nice analysis CR. The irony is not lost on many of us here. Not only are the Ukrainians depleting 155mm ammunition stocks. In doing so they are wearing out a finite supply of artillery barrels/tubes at a prodigious rate. Which degrades accuracy meaning even more rounds need to be fired to achieve the same effect. (Costly smart rounds notwithstanding.) A downward spiral with only one very predictable outcome. Journalists harp on about 155mm round production but forget that the west has even fewer producers of barrels. It can take ten years to train engineers to operate barrel forging facilities. The… Read more »

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_815648)
14 days ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Hi CR Yes Bomber Harris got it wrong I think. Certainly when he was targetting cities rather than military targets it hardened the determination of the inhabitents. Also Ukraine must avoid targeting civilians as they will run foul of international law and run the risk of alienating western partners. Should however Ukraine be able to completely blunt the air superiority of the Russians that will even the odds a little. If the Russian supply lines can be severed that will also be an excellent move. I totally agree that the land must be retaken I am merely thinking the odds… Read more »

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815348)
15 days ago
Reply to  Mark B

At the end of the day, victory for Ukraine amounts to retaking the Donbas and ideally also Crimea – and ejecting every Russian military person and asset from its territory. It is crucially a land war.
UKR has been admirable in writing down the Russian Navy and Air Force but they must win the ground war to secure victory.

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_815649)
14 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

True it is crucially a land war however if the Russians have supperiority in the air and at sea then that make the land battles all the more difficult. If the Ukainians could establish air supiority that would make things far easier for Ukraine.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815651)
14 days ago
Reply to  Mark B

In order to successfully go on the offensive, you need to have air supremacy or at least limited air superiority. That is an established mantra. My point was that no-one should think that UKR victory will be achieved by just doing very well at the naval war, and having some success in defeating enemy aircraft.

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_815668)
13 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Hi Graham. Yes so on the basis of your mantra and reasoning if Ukraine get at least limited air superiority then that limits the ability of the Russians to move forward on the ground and allows Ukraine to start recovering ground. If Ukraine continue to chip away at the Russian air force then that forces them to either move them out of reach or accept the losses. The Black sea fleet issue revolves more around the ability of Ukraine to ship out grain etc. bringing in income to support the war effort. It also demonstrates an ability to use drones… Read more »

Andy reeves
Andy reeves (@guest_815681)
13 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

no sign of I going to happen at the moment

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_815292)
15 days ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

In terms of SP AA, could they mean those palletised 40 mm guns that can be carried around on the back of a truck? Can’t think of much else they could be meaning…

Rudeboy
Rudeboy (@guest_815654)
13 days ago
Reply to  Joe16

You’re thnking of the MSI Terrahwak Paladin. A small number have been supplied.

But the listing above conflates 2 things…Self Propelled Artillery and Anti-aircraft guns…

The 100 AA guns have previously been listed as ‘Towed’. The suspicion is that the UK has found a load of ZU-23-2 on the secondhand market and purchased and sent.

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_815657)
13 days ago
Reply to  Rudeboy

Thanks, couldn’t remember the name of those things- they look like good kit though.
I suppose, if you were to get Sadiq Khan to donate a non-ULEZ pickup for each of the ZU-23-2s, then you’re pretty much at self propelled?!

Andy reeves
Andy reeves (@guest_815683)
13 days ago
Reply to  Joe16

our army needs a lot of this equipment. it’s not achieved anything tangible, so maybe it takes to slow down on major equipment being lost just when defence is back on the political agenda again.

David Lee
David Lee (@guest_815319)
15 days ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

The uk paid for some M109 s to be refurbished and supplied to Ukraine

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815350)
15 days ago
Reply to  David Lee

M109s are not SP AA systems – they are SPGs.

David Lee
David Lee (@guest_815352)
15 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

I know that I worked on them for 12 years but it would account the higher number of guns supplied. Reading other comments and I work at the Royal school of artillery we’re going to be left woefully undergunned for some time I find it alarming

Andy reeves
Andy reeves (@guest_815684)
13 days ago
Reply to  David Lee

agreed! think the UK has given enough

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_815437)
15 days ago
Reply to  David Lee

Yeh, if I remember rightly they were Belgian guns that had been in storage. I believe we also applied some upgrades to them as well..?

Cheers CR

Rudeboy
Rudeboy (@guest_815655)
13 days ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

The Belgian guns did not require upgrades, just quick refurb to blow the cobwebs off.

The Belgians themselves had spent a fortune upgrading them to an advanced standard before retiring them a scant few years later…they were probably better spec than most US Paladin’s..

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_815196)
16 days ago

While that is great, Ukraine needs so much more. Its fighting Russia that has put its economy into war mode. Russia had loads of soviet war stock and as fast as it’s being used it’s not finished yet.
The U.K. should be aiming to give at least 1 preferably 2% of gdP. Some aid, some loans or whatever.
If Europe doesn’t give more soon Ukraine will be in big trouble.

Markam
Markam (@guest_815198)
16 days ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Anything that is soon to be replaced should ideally be sent to Ukraine asap, even items that are waiting for replacement such as Warrior & AS90, though it seems we added 18 more AS90 in the last package. Seems crazy sending out kit that is not yet replaced but honestly are they going to be used by the UK any time soon? Especially AS90, which we have already sent 1/2 of what was a modest force to begin with, what are the rest of them going to do? They’re not even modern due to lack of upgrades. Once we’re out… Read more »

Louis
Louis (@guest_815239)
16 days ago
Reply to  Markam

89 AS90 pre war. 50 already delivered and more pledged in the latest package. Given many were in a very poor state, I doubt we have much if anything left beyond training and Estonia.

Last edited 16 days ago by Louis
Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815351)
15 days ago
Reply to  Louis

We gave UKR many AS-90s that were in a poor state?
I heard we gave them 12 unfit AS-90s plus 20 good ones in the first tranche. The 12 were for them to strip for spares. The 20 should have been good.

Seemingly we have sent another 18 AS-90s which I had not heard about to make the figure of 50. I assume they were all good ones.

Last edited 15 days ago by Graham Moore
ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_815243)
16 days ago
Reply to  Markam

Hi Markam, We are already supplying a lot of kit that we have procured on the international arms market or from allies. For example, you mention the AS90. According to the Statista we have supplied 30 AS90 and 28 M109 howitzers from Belgium stocks. The letter we upgraded before sending them to Ukraine because, if I remember rightly, they were even older than the AS90’s and taken out of long term storage. As for developing stuff in a hurry reading between the lines I think we have been exploiting our rapidly developing and expanding drone industry. Much of the development… Read more »

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815636)
14 days ago
Reply to  Markam

If we send everything we’ve got to Ukraine, do you expect HMT to quickly come up with the cash to rebuld our donated fleets?

Carrickter
Carrickter (@guest_815254)
16 days ago

50 AS90 doesn’t seem right, last time I heard it was 32, although 18 of these were non-working and for spares use only.

Unless the initial reports were wrong, and it was 32 working guns plus 18 for spares?

Someone mentioned 28 Belgian M109s too, but don’t think that makes the numbers work…

Hard to know if these MPs are just misunderstanding the figures they are given/giving, or if its a policy of deliberate ambiguity!

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_815438)
15 days ago
Reply to  Carrickter

Hi Carrickter,

According to Statista website we have supplied 30 AS90 from our own stocks and 28 refurbished / upgraded M109’s from Belgian stocks.

Cheers CR

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815611)
14 days ago
Reply to  Carrickter

I heard we donated 20 fully fit guns and 12 unserviceable guns suitable for breaking for spares.

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_815290)
15 days ago

I still really wan to know what those long range attack drones are..! Confirmation that they’re the modified Banshees would be sufficient.
Interesting to note that we’ve provided AMRAAM for SAMs, I hadn’t seen that before. For NASAMs I suppose?

Rudeboy
Rudeboy (@guest_815656)
13 days ago
Reply to  Joe16

Amraam B and C-5 for NASAM’s.

Mark
Mark (@guest_815441)
15 days ago

Ponzi proxy

Andy reeves
Andy reeves (@guest_815676)
13 days ago

I didn’t know we had that much to give away will any of it come back after the war ends?

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815746)
13 days ago
Reply to  Andy reeves

The Lend-Lease deal we had with the US – we were meant to return any unused kit at end of WW2 or pay for it.
Maybe the same applies here, but I doubt UKR will have anything left of the Western kit afterwards or will have to keep it to prevent further Russian invasions.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_815920)
12 days ago
Reply to  Andy reeves

Yes, when posters moan endlessly on here they forget, or did not know, that we are often in a better position than many.
Just how come we had so many NLAW to send in the first place if we are living hand to mouth?
Because we are not.

Andy reeves
Andy reeves (@guest_815680)
13 days ago

I think unless the Ukrainians start showing a tangible return in results with all the western kit we should draw back on our material support and concentrate on ourselves. Ukraine is not getting anywhere at the moment, if anything they are being pushed back again.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_815747)
13 days ago
Reply to  Andy reeves

UKR has no real airpower and very little artillery ammunition (tube and rocket). Its amazing they have only lost a few villages in the last few weeks.

The West needs to send far, far more kit – and quickly.