The operational future of HMS Bulwark remains uncertain as the new government continues the previous administration’s approach of keeping the amphibious assault ship in extended readiness, only to be deployed “if required.”

Recent statements from the Ministry of Defence confirm that, despite ongoing regeneration work, the vessel is unlikely to return to regular service unless deemed necessary for defence operations. This mirrors the position under the previous government, which had already shifted expectations away from a clear timeline for the ship’s return to active duty.

In response to a question raised by Andrew Rosindell MP on 14th October 2024, Maria Eagle, Minister of State for Defence, reiterated that “one Landing Platform Dock (LPD) ship has been held in extended readiness since 2010 so that she can be regenerated if required.” She further explained that HMS Albion has now taken HMS Bulwark’s place in extended readiness, allowing HMS Bulwark to undergo regeneration. “Once regenerated, she can be ready to deliver defence outputs if required,” she added.

However, no specific timelines or forecasts for the ships’ availability were provided.

This echoes statements made earlier in the year by James Cartlidge, then Minister of State for Defence under the previous government, who also suggested that HMS Bulwark’s return to active service was conditional. Cartlidge had noted that the ship would be “regenerated from extended readiness and maintained so that she can be ready to deliver defence outputs if required,” implying that the vessel’s operational future would depend on strategic needs rather than a set schedule.

HMS Bulwark had initially been expected to return to regular service in 2023, with clear timelines for its regeneration and maintenance. However, this commitment has shifted over time, with the emphasis now on maintaining the ship’s readiness for deployment only if necessary.

This approach, described by some as “extended readiness under a different name,” has led to uncertainty about the long-term future of the Albion-class assault ships.

While HMS Bulwark and its sister ship HMS Albion remain valuable assets for the Royal Navy, their fluctuating operational status highlights ongoing questions about the UK’s amphibious warfare capabilities and the crewing concerns required to maintain them.

Despite public outcry and media attention when plans to potentially scrap the ships were leaked in the past, both vessels still, on paper, remain in service.

The Ministry of Defence’s current position suggests that HMS Bulwark, although not being immediately returned to the fleet, will remain available for deployment if defence requirements call for it. However, with no firm commitment to reintegrate the ship into regular service, its future remains as uncertain as it was under the previous government.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tomartyr
Tomartyr (@guest_865121)
4 hours ago

Am i right in thinking this is all smoke and mirrors and that at the end of ‘regeneration’ they’ll both be in extended readiness?

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_865123)
4 hours ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

Bulwark will at least not be part stripped like Albion, but yes, no crew for either.

Dunedin42
Dunedin42 (@guest_865136)
3 hours ago

Two articles in Navy Lookout raise other questions. With the PFI contract for equipment transport with AWSR apparently expiring in 2025, and if HMG has considered the possible USMC “toe in the water” interest in an Australian Stern Landing Vessel system. Is a potential for a reduction in the size of landing ship, and increase in numbers, a realistic option?

Levi Goldsteinberg
Levi Goldsteinberg (@guest_865142)
3 hours ago
Reply to  Dunedin42

That concept is broadly address by MRSS, no?

Dunedin42
Dunedin42 (@guest_865146)
3 hours ago

Yes. You would hope so.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_865143)
3 hours ago
Reply to  Dunedin42

Those medium landing vessels don’t really suit us, they don’t have the legs to go anywhere.

Geoffi
Geoffi (@guest_865150)
2 hours ago

Neither will set sail under the White Ensign ever again.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_865151)
2 hours ago

2 Carriers. No LLD.
Or 1 Carrier, 1 LPD, as was the 2010 plan until Cameron said in 2015 that both Carriers would be crewed and operational.
What would we choose? The Admiralty seems to have chosen the former based on the lack of personnel.

Grizzler
Grizzler (@guest_865219)
6 seconds ago

Ah Call me Daves short sightedness strikes again…

Robert Vincent
Robert Vincent (@guest_865167)
2 hours ago

How can the Navy practice landings without both these ships. It’s such a waste of taxpayer money not to use them. Instead they rot away in Devonport. Another cut back, just how many ships do we have that are operational, most being upgrade or disposed off. It’s a very sad day. Back in the 1970s we had more ships displayed on Navy Days (what fun) than we have in total today.

Luke Rogers
Luke Rogers (@guest_865171)
1 hour ago

HMGov will probably sell one to Argentina and withdraw the FI guard ship before this parliament ends.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_865187)
53 minutes ago
Reply to  Luke Rogers

That is harsh.

Geoff Roach
Geoff Roach (@guest_865175)
1 hour ago

Albion and Bulwark are toast…

DB
DB (@guest_865180)
1 hour ago

Gunbuster would have an interesting take on this – how long would a crew need to qualify on just one of the platforms; he has written the past about certain crew needing courses before going on board.

So, IMHO, this is Govt spin and they should be challenged on it.

Michael Hannah
Michael Hannah (@guest_865181)
1 hour ago

I am severe danger of concussion from these utter cretins. If there is a better option on the table great but can we please for once not have a capability gap.
Or do they really think the bad guys will give them 5 to 10 years notice on hostilities, because I have news for those in power “ they already did”
Better yet, give them to the Ukraine forces, they could make use for a wee holiday in Crimea. The Turks will bitch about it going through the Dardanelles but as it won’t be coming back out, who cares?

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_865190)
51 minutes ago

It is clear that amphibious mission is a pipe dream as long as Argentinians are as they are.
In broad terms the amphibious capability for a armed forces of this size should be special forces.