The Royal Navy’s ambition to fly an uncrewed combat jet from one of its aircraft carriers has been given a firmer timeline, with the Ministry of Defence telling Parliament it intends to conduct an embarked demonstration of a Collaborative Combat Aircraft from a Queen Elizabeth-class carrier within the next eighteen months.

The intention itself is not new, having been set out by the First Sea Lord, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, at the DSEI defence exhibition in September 2025, when he told industry the Royal Navy intended to launch its first jet-powered collaborative platform as a concept demonstrator off a Queen Elizabeth-class carrier “as soon as next year”, and what has changed in the months since is the context around it, with the latest commitment now restated on the record by a minister, attached to a defined eighteen-month window, and made explicitly conditional on the Defence Investment Plan, the spending document over which the Defence Secretary and Armed Forces Minister both resigned a fortnight ago.

The Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry, Luke Pollard, set out the plan in a written answer to the Conservative MP for Huntingdon, Ben Obese-Jecty, who had asked what progress had been made under Project VANQUISH, the effort to deliver a short take-off and landing, jet-powered autonomous platform able to operate from the carriers.

Pollard said progress on the project was “focused on feasibility, industry engagement, and option development ahead of any acquisition decisions”. While investment decisions remained “subject to the outcome of the Defence Investment Plan”, he said, the Royal Navy, working with industry, “intends to conduct an embarked demonstration of an uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft from a Queen Elizabeth Class carrier within the next 18 months”.

Project VANQUISH itself is not new, having been trailed as the Royal Navy’s route towards operating autonomous jets from its carriers, but the commitment to actually put a Collaborative Combat Aircraft onto a carrier deck within a defined window moves the programme from concept towards a concrete trial, even as the larger questions of what is bought, and when, remain unresolved.

A Collaborative Combat Aircraft is an uncrewed jet designed to fly alongside crewed aircraft, carrying sensors, weapons or electronic warfare payloads and acting as a force multiplier for a smaller number of crewed platforms. For the Royal Navy, fielding such an aircraft from the carriers would expand the reach and mass of the air wing beyond the F-35B Lightning, the only fast jet the carriers currently embark, and would fit the wider Hybrid Air Wing concept set out in the Strategic Defence Review, in which crewed jets and helicopters operate alongside uncrewed aircraft.

The carriers have already been used as trials platforms for uncrewed flight, with fixed-wing drones having been flown from and recovered to their decks in earlier demonstrations as the Royal Navy works through the practical challenges of launching and landing autonomous aircraft from a ship at sea without catapults or arrestor wires.

The familiar caveat hangs over the programme, with Pollard tying any acquisition decision to the Defence Investment Plan, the unpublished spending document on which a long line of capability choices now depends, from the Crowsnest early warning replacement to the future of the surface fleet.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

12 COMMENTS

  1. Sadly fixed wing is taking longer than thought, we still have crows nest and no replacement soon. Do like co axial pusher helicopter like the Sikorsky x raider if they did a drone version??

    • I’ve gained $17,240 only within four weeks by comfortably working part-time from home. Immediately when I had lost my last business, I was very troubled and thankfully I’ve located this project now in this way I’m in a position to receive thousand USD directly from home. Each individual certainly can do this easy work & make more greenbacks online by visiting

      following website—.,.,.,.,.—>>> J­o­b­a­t­Ho­m­e­1.C­o­m

  2. Is anyone aware of the contenders? Or are they going to say jet-powered but end up getting MQ-90B STOL because they go ‘Erm, actually, technically it’s a gas turbine engine”

    • GA have shown Gambit 5 operating on the small Australian LPHs, that indicates some level of STOL capacity though small arrestor gear might be required. BAE’s ACP is listed as STOL on their website but there has been next to no information on it. I feel like there’s another but those are the two I can think of off the top of my head.

      • I can’t seem to find anything on Gambit on the LHD. Where did you see that? I forgot that the ACP will be comparable to the BAE Systems Hawk advanced jet trainer, but there’s also the Concept 2 UAV. I forgot they unveiled designs a few years ago.

        • I’ve gained $17,240 only within four weeks by comfortably working part-time from home. Immediately when I had lost my last business, I was very troubled and thankfully I’ve located this project now in this way I’m in a position to receive thousand USD directly from home. Each individual certainly can do this easy work & make more greenbacks online by visiting

          following website—.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.—>>> P­a­y­A­t­H­o­m­e­1.C­o­m

  3. We should focus on getting a MALE like MQ9B STOVL onboard able to do AEW, MPA, Cruise and anti ship missile strike as well as land based ISR and interdiction.

    For everything else F35 is fine.

    This seems like total waste of time and money at this stage unless use an actual developed capability which I don’t see happening.

  4. Do we actually need drineson out carriers? Or should the government take its head out of its backside and order the F35Bs need to give these ships a decent airwing? We have the ships, but not enough planes, it’s laughable!

    • Because we’ve only just received the first batch of 48th aircraft in April, which was ordered back in 2012. And the 75th F-35 delivery by the end of 2033, if we buy the 138 F-35Bs. Not sure if that number now includes the F-35As or if they will be additional or ordered. I think the MOD is waiting for block 4 as well. This could be why a shift towards CCAs in order to buy cheaper and pad out airframe numbers.

      • There are plenty of US weapons we can put on our F35s without needing to wait for Block 4.. At the end of the day, it’s one procurement disaster after another, and we simply refuse to learn the lesson that off the shelf purchases give you the very latest weaponry for a better price here and now. The F35 is the very best western 5th gen aircraft out there, and we should have placed orders for greater numbers which we knew we would need a long time ago, but successive governments have failed our armed forces. ‘Padding out’ with drones is not the answer

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here