A prototype uncrewed missile platform and extra-large uncrewed underwater vessels are intended to be in Royal Navy service by 2030, the Ministry of Defence has said, committing at least £1.5 billion over the next four years to begin delivering the Hybrid Navy.
The commitments came in written parliamentary answers from Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry Luke Pollard on 10 July, responding to shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge, who asked about the construction timelines, workforce requirements and funding shares of the Type 91, Type 92, Type 93 and Type 94 vessels and the Common Combat Vessel.
“Defence will invest at least £1.5 billion over the next four years to begin delivering the Hybrid Navy, including the integration of autonomous underwater, surface and airborne systems to deliver mass and persistence,” Pollard said. “By 2030, we aim to have brought the first large autonomous vessels into service, including a prototype uncrewed missile platform and extra-large uncrewed underwater vessels (XLUUVs), with payloads developed through AUKUS. The optimal breakdown of this £1.5 billion investment between different types of vessel will now be developed in consultation with industry.”
The £1.5 billion commitment is higher than the £1 billion figure referenced in Cartlidge’s question, and the funding split between the different vessels is yet to be settled, as are the programmes themselves, with the minister saying construction schedules and workforce requirements “will be determined as the programmes progress through their concept and assessment phases.” His answer confirmed that the Defence Investment Plan “set out the Royal Navy’s future approach to a family of autonomous and hybrid naval capabilities, including the Type 91, Type 92, Type 93 and Type 94 systems, alongside the Common Combat Vessel.” The family comprises the Type 91 uncrewed missile platforms, the Type 92 uncrewed underwater sensing platforms, the Type 93 extra-large uncrewed underwater vehicles and the Type 94 uncrewed sensor platforms, which will work alongside the Common Combat Vessels and the eight Type 26 and five Type 31 crewed frigates in what the plan describes as a once in a generation investment in new maritime capability.
The 2030 aim is interesting given the department’s separate statement, given the same day, that no service entry date has been set for the Type 91 as a class, with a prototype in the water preceding any formal decision on fleet introduction. The underwater element, corresponding to the Type 93, builds on ground the Royal Navy has already broken, having trialled the XV Excalibur extra-large uncrewed underwater vessel from Plymouth, and the reference to payloads developed through AUKUS matches the Defence Investment Plan’s identification of weapons and sensors for underwater drones as the signature project under the partnership’s second pillar with the United States and Australia.
The by-2030 milestone gives the hybrid fleet its first firm near-term marker, ahead of the six Common Combat Vessels intended to arrive as the Type 45 destroyers retire from the mid-2030s, and industry is already moving on both the platforms and their weapons, with the department having asked for missile silos able to remain ready to fire for 30 days unattended aboard uncrewed vessels, and Navantia UK setting out this week that its Appledore yard could build two large autonomous vessels concurrently and deliver two a year.
Where the Type 91 to 94 family will be built remains open, with the Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney urging the government this week to settle such questions by designating its core shipbuilding sites and awarding work directly to smooth demand across them.
What’s what?
Type 91 — uncrewed missile platform. The “missile barge” concept: an autonomous surface vessel carrying missile silos to add magazine depth to the fleet, part of the future maritime air defence and strike mix alongside the CCVs. A prototype is aimed to be in service by 2030, no class service entry date set. The May RFI for silos that can stay ready to fire for 30 days unattended aboard uncrewed vessels is almost certainly its enabling technology.
Type 92 — uncrewed underwater sensing platform. A submarine-hunting and underwater surveillance drone, the ASW and seabed-monitoring element of the family. Sits naturally with the undersea infrastructure protection push, though the MOD hasn’t detailed it beyond the designation, it’s likely to pull a towed array sonar and be a surface vessel.
Type 93 — extra-large uncrewed underwater vehicle (XLUUV). The big autonomous submarine, building on the XV Excalibur trials from Plymouth, with payloads developed through AUKUS Pillar 2, which the DIP identifies as the partnership’s signature project. Also in the by-2030 first-vessels aim from Friday’s answer.
Type 94 — uncrewed sensor platform. The surface counterpart to the 92: an autonomous picket ship extending the fleet’s radar and sensor coverage, named alongside the Type 91 in the maritime air defence mix that replaces the Type 45’s role.












It is going to be commanded and controlled by what?
By the T45 or by satellite from anywhere in the world. These are not remote controlled ships.
Makes sense to get the type 91 out now combined with the T45. All it’s needs to do is combine 16mk41 VLS with an autonomous boat. This will be a very useful supplement to the T45.
The type 94 and the command ship can come later.
If they are not remotely controlled ships what are they? Nor is there any mention of the 45’s taking control or satellites. I’m not trying to be awkward but I see another gap coming.
So a missile barge with no air search and AAW radar?
I wonder if the perfidious enemy might target that effectively defenceless vessel for round one destruction?
I think the idea is it will be networked to sensor nodes…
We went down this route in the late 40’s, 50’s with classes of radar picket Frigates.
You ended up with small vulnerable prime targets hung out to dry over the horizon.
Honestly read what you wrote, we went down this route in the 1940’s did we. 😀
They were probably missing a combined engagement capability or missiles 😀
Actually we did. Leopard class were laid down in 1953 as Just Me suggested.. Radar Picket ships.
They’ll probably push some sort of vessel with some sort of capability and after a short trial period in perfect conditions declare it a success…!!
In 1914-18 we went down the Battle Cruiser route with Speed is Amour… And that didn’t work out to well..!
It’s not just for AAW. You could put strike missiles in the tubes, cued by satellite, to essentially make a marine version of Reaper. This would be a significant capability uplift.
If im correct the focus of the RN is the North Atlantic
If thats the case i wonder what these small autonomous vessel will be any good in a winter storm
Radar picket vessels go back to WWII …Best memory of them in the Falklands …. Tough and difficult job…
However are we trying to run before we can Walk with Drones.Perhaps it’s money that’s pushing the pace…!
Worked so well in the Falklands and definitely didn’t result in multiple ships being sank. Lets hope lessons are learnt. In the Falklands the issue was the ships identifying the targets couldn’t hit them due to lack of range of weapons and the longer range ships weren’t in range either as the picket has to be pretty broad.
Lessons learned from the Falklands
You need a bloody big powerful radar, the bigliest and most powerful you can manage.
You need to mount it as high as possible to gain as much ‘hight of eye’ as you can to increase yiur radar horizon.
Radar horizon is life – the more miles, the longer your reaction time
Channels of fire – lots of them, and lots more.
Your missiles need range – as much as you can manage – Yiu start shouting at 100 miles you can get away a second salvo at the leakers.
And then we invent rinky dink 2000 tonne radar pickets
Yep, and radar pickets were to push the radar horizon out to compensate for the relatively poor radars of the day with effective ranges in double digits.
And here we are, we now have very powerful shipboard radars able to reach out many hundreds of miles, and we’re going to remove them from major warships and fit little radars on small ships to act as radar pickets to move the radar horizon out.
Future Navy! Back to the Future!
Offcourse you be aware that the Horizon is still a problem no matter how big your radar is?
The big difference with this concept is that the radar pickets are not manned and are deemed expendable.
What’s the height of eye you can manage on a toy 2000 tonne boat?
There’s that 2030 again🙄🙄
Seems hugely ambitious considering they only just put out a tender for unscrewed missile silos. Surely they can’t start designing the ship until they know what the silo would look like.
They already know what the silo looks like they just need to know if it can be maintenance free and loaded for one month.
How do they know, they have put out a tender for a silo that can be used. Until someone designs it and works out what challenges that need to be overcome, it’s impossible to know what shape and size it will need to be surely?
Watch the timetable slip .
So the MOD plans more silos able to expand the Navy’s capacity but no money to expand the missile stocks, so that capacity will remain empty.