The United Kingdom does not lack innovation. Across our universities, laboratories and technology companies, there is an extraordinary depth of talent.
The real challenge, it has become clear, is how to translate that innovation into operational capability quickly enough to matter.
This is the structural tension at the heart of modern defence. Traditional acquisition models favour scale, assurance and long development cycles, while emerging technology companies thrive on agility, experimentation and speed. Yet national advantage increasingly depends on bringing these two worlds together. My view is that, if the UK is to maintain its technological edge, we must rethink how innovation moves from theoretical to the frontline.
From a purely scale perspective, many of the most disruptive technologies shaping defence are emerging not from large primes but from fast-growing technology scale-up companies. Artificial Intelligence, autonomy, advanced materials and digital systems are areas where scale-ups are often moving at remarkable pace.
But there is a paradox: the very agility that allows these companies to innovate can be lost if they are absorbed into large organisations. Cultural friction, regulation, governance structures and the demands of large programmes can unintentionally slow the momentum that made those companies valuable in the first place. At the same time, defence customers quite rightly require the assurance, safety, integration and scale that established industrial partners provide. A promising technology alone is not enough; it must often be integrated, deployable, reliable and supported by a robust industrial backbone.
Collaboration as the emerging model
The reality, therefore, is that the future of defence belongs to the manner in which primes and scale-ups can successfully work together towards a common goal. With this in mind, the emerging model for defence capability is not only one where large companies acquire innovative firms, but where they collaborate. The goal is co-delivery, combining the creativity and speed of high-growth technology firms with the integration expertise and industrial capacity of established defence companies.
This approach recognises an important truth about innovation: breakthrough ideas flourish in agile environments. At the same time, national resilience requires those ideas to be scaled, integrated and deployed through trusted industrial frameworks. At Leonardo UK, collaboration with emerging technology companies is therefore a deliberate industrial choice.
Rather than attempting to integrate innovation, our approach – including traditional mergers and acquisitions where appropriate – is to identify high-potential UK technology companies working on solutions aligned with real operational demand. Those technologies are then integrated into deployable systems, supported by Leonardo UK’s engineering expertise, safety assurance and manufacturing capability.
For scale-ups, this offers assurance, credibility and access to defence customers that would otherwise be difficult to achieve alone, not to mention a greater visibility with VC and PE investors. For the wider defence ecosystem, it accelerates the journey from prototype to deployable capability. Together, this strengthens UK sovereign supply chains while supporting high-skill jobs and industrial growth.
The changing nature of defence advantage
Why does this matter? Because the nature of defence advantage is changing.
Historically, military capability was often defined by large, sophisticated platforms such as aircraft, ships and armoured vehicles. While those platforms remain essential, the decisive advantage increasingly lies in the technology inside them, such as sensors, electronic warfare systems, software, autonomy and data integration. In other words, the battlespace is becoming more technological, and the intelligence inside the platform is becoming as important as the platform itself.
That shift has important implications for how innovation should be organised. Capability cycles are shortening, new technologies must be integrated and iterated rapidly, and integration speed now matters as much as invention. Collaboration allows the UK to move faster.
By combining the agility of scale-ups with the experience of established defence companies, we can reduce the time it takes for new technologies to move from concept to operational use. At the same time, we can ensure that those technologies meet the safety, certification and reliability standards required in defence environments.
Strengthening sovereign capability
Importantly, this model also strengthens sovereign capability. The geopolitical environment is becoming more fragmented and contested, and control of data, technology and supply chains is increasingly central to national resilience. The ability to develop, integrate and sustain advanced capabilities domestically is therefore not simply an industrial concern; it is a strategic one.
A collaborative ecosystem of primes, scale-ups, universities and government provides the foundation for that resilience. It also reflects a broader reality: no single organisation can deliver the full spectrum of modern defence innovation alone. The pace of technological change is simply too great.
Success will depend on networks of expertise working together. For the UK, the opportunity is clear. We possess world-class universities, a vibrant technology sector and an experienced defence industrial base, and when these elements are connected effectively, the result is a powerful innovation ecosystem capable of delivering sovereign advantage.
Combining scale and agility
Achieving that outcome requires deliberate design. Collaboration must be structured, sustained and aligned with real operational needs – including procurement, where Government must recognise the benefits of cooperative development. When done well, scale-up collaboration does more than accelerate innovation; it also strengthens industrial resilience, supports high-value employment and ensuring that British ingenuity translates into deployable capability.
By bringing together the creativity of high-growth technology companies with the integration expertise and industrial strength of established defence partners, the UK can ensure that innovation does not remain in the laboratory, but becomes deployable capability. When scale and agility work in concert, British innovation can translate into real operational advantage.
This article is the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the UK Defence Journal. If you would like to submit your own article on this topic or any other, please see our submission guidelines











I am making a real GOOD MONEY (300$ to 400$ / hr )online from my laptop. Last month I GOT check of nearly 18,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. At that point this work opportunity is for you.if you interested.simply give it a shot on the accompanying site….Simply go to the BELOW SITE and start your work…
This is what I do….. http://www.giftpay7.vip
Is it from selling illicit narcotics?
Just wondering!
A friend of Ghislaine Maxwell?
The real problem is the UK Government not buying any thing apart from service contracts, of course kit should never be borght just for sake of it and rushed in to use. How ever there is a of lot of nothing going on and has been for nearly 2 years at least publicly.
If we actually scaled up, it would be fine. The oligarchs don’t want to spend the necessary money!
I’ve gained $17,240 only within four weeks by comfortably working part-time from home. Immediately when I had lost my last business, I was very troubled and thankfully I’ve located this project now in this way I’m in a position to receive thousand USD directly from home. Each individual certainly can do this easy work & make more greenbacks online by visiting
following website—,,,,,,,,,,,,…—>>> JobatHome1.Com
‘The real challenge, it has become clear, is how to translate that innovation into operational capability quickly enough to matter.’
In fact it is already clear, as set out in another article on here.
‘This is what Europe has to learn. We do not need to replace existing defence companies; their expertise is essential. But the system has to open up. New firms need direct access to funding, contracts, and the military. Procurement must become faster and more flexible. The priority is to let companies work with Ukraine now: to test systems in real conditions, iterate quickly, and absorb a culture of constant improvement.’
That cannot happen with a bureaucratic minefield of overregulation supervised, processed by a massive unwieldy and inefficient MoD procurement department. Only the very largest companies have the financial and staffing resources to work with such a procurement system, a system that has shown itself over and over again to be unfit for purpose.
Across the piece in Whitehall, 550,000 civil servants now do the same work done by 380,000 in 2019. Systemic reform is required, nowhere more so than within Britain’s Ministry of Defence.
It doesn’t help when China runs off with your intellectual property because someone has forgotten a Chinese financed company has bought shares in UK tech companies.
It is a concern, but having shares in a company doesn’t necessarily give access to any of the IPR. It mainly means that they have invested in the company by giving it working capital. Now if the Chinese have employees in the company that is really questionable.
“The real challenge, it has become clear, is how to translate that innovation into operational capability quickly enough to matter.”
Seems to be a simple answer, fewer committees with fewer non-military, ill-informed participants and more money. I know that is over simplistic…
A lot comes back to the type of graduates we produce – civil service “managers” with secure pensions and little technical ability [look at the population of parliament]. We close physics, electronics, computer science because rigour is required while expanding business schools to produce clerical assistants. The solution is obvoious although I don’t see a government of any party to take action.
I’ve gained $17,240 only within four weeks by comfortably working part-time from home. Immediately when I had lost my last business, I was very troubled and thankfully I’ve located this project now in this way I’m in a position to receive thousand USD directly from home. Each individual certainly can do this easy work & make more greenbacks online by visiting.
following website—,,,,,…—>>> PaYatHome1.Com
As Chief Architect of a US/UK SME providing sensor, guidance and control systems to drone programmes, I read this article with interest. However, it does not align with what we are seeing in operational environments today. Our customers—primarily in Ukraine and the Middle East—are consistent in their priorities:
1) Capability now, not promises
They are not interested in slides, brochures, specs, proposals, or the long design and development procurement cycles of ‘wonder weapons’. They want to see systems effective in their airspace and maritime environments today—and they need to be able to afford to use them at scale.
2) Scale measured in thousands per month
Discussions typically start at ~1,000 units/month and increase from there. At this level, cost is not a factor—it is the factor. Systems that cost millions per unit are simply not deployable in meaningful numbers.
3) Sovereign, non-ITAR, COTS supply chains
Customers increasingly require “blue” supply chains (non-PRC, non-ITAR), with local manufacturing. Multi-year approvals and dependency on US/UK supply and export processes are seen by my customers as high operational risks, not safeguards.
Replying to your specific points:
Integration
In practice, customers are providing real-world data and direct system access via API’s. Integration is adaptive, iterative, fast, and operationally driven. Complex, multi-year integration programmes are neither feasible nor desirable in this context.
Deployment
Deployment is deliberately simple—often large number of vehicles (e.g. light trucks), rapidly deployable, attributable and designed for contested environments. High-cost, large, complex deployment platforms are not aligned with how these systems are actually used.
Scale
The challenge is not scaling a single production line—it is scaling many small, distributed production nodes, often in contested environments and at very high volumes. This is a fundamentally different manufacturing model from traditional defence programmes, which are typically low-volume and centralised.
Reliability vs Attritability
These systems are designed to be attritable. A 20% loss rate in operation is acceptable if the unit cost is low enough and production volume is high enough. The objective is not perfection—it is sustained operational effect.
Given these realities, it is unclear what role traditional primes play in this segment.
Their strengths—compliance, large-scale integration, high-assurance systems—are valuable in some domains. But they do not map cleanly onto the low-cost, high-volume, rapidly iterated systems deployed in active conflict zones today.
If there is a model where primes add value in this space, it would be useful to define it concretely—beyond general terms such as “integration”, “scale”, or “assurance”.
I belive this is probably less a question of scaling existing models, and more a question of whether the model itself needs to change.
Thank you 👍