Russian attack helicopter accidentally strikes spectators during exercise

22

A video has emerged reportedly showing a Russian attack helicopter accidentally striking spectators while taking part in the Zapad 2017 military exercise.

According to an unofficial source, two journalists were hospitalised with serious injuries and two vehicles were damaged/destroyed due to a weapons malfunction aboard the Russian attack helicopter.

There has been no official report from the Russian military yet.

It is understood that one of the pair of Ka-52 attack helicopters flying in an attack formation accidentally fired a rocket toward the crowd that gathered at the Luzhsky training ground near St. Petersburg, according to local media outlet 66.ru.

The sites unnamed source suggested that the launch of air-to-ground missiles occurred accidentally due to technical malfunctions:

“They were flying engaged on target, there was some 500 metres left to it and the weapon chains got locked on the mission’s attack route, they turned on, but there was some kind of a short circuit and missiles were launched without command.

Missile fragments projected across a wide area. At least two vehicles were burnt down, two people were seriously injured, now they are at the hospital. Most probably, it was journalists who got hit.”

Zapad, which means “west” in Russian, is the reincarnation of a Soviet-era training exercise that involved Warsaw Pact countries, and is carried out every four years.

22
Leave a Reply

avatar
13 Comment threads
9 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
17 Comment authors
BB85JamesonKieranCMr BellplaNETerry invAsian Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Harry Nelson
Guest
Harry Nelson

Doh!

Levi Goldsteinberg
Guest
Levi Goldsteinberg

Is there any Russian offensive weaponry system that isn’t second rate and unreliable

Jonny
Guest
Jonny

no

Jameson
Guest
Jameson

Their SAM.

Tim62
Guest
Tim62

Where do you stand on these latest Russian exercises?

well to the side…

joe
Guest
joe

Can’t think of a single system the UK has that’s better than Ivan’s equivalent.
Maybe the AH-64.

Paul
Guest
Paul

Deployed or in the pipeline?

spyinthesky
Guest

Well one certainly has to admit that the Russian stuff is lethal thats for sure.

dave12
Guest
dave12

uk attack subs are better ,the uk chally 2 tank is better t45 destroyer is better than any russian navy ship so joe stop being self defeatist or are you RUSSIAN YOURSELF?

Jameson
Guest
Jameson

Infantry

BB85
Guest
BB85

Russia has the numbers to be a military threat but the bulk of their equipment is old and in a poor state. Their latest equipment is still at the T&E stage and in very low numbers.

Pappy
Guest
Pappy

Malfunction my behind…..have you ever seen the Russian driving videos??

Matt
Guest
Matt

Russian junk…

Jonny
Guest
Jonny

lol

Matt
Guest
Matt

Guy must have sneezed and hit the trigger lol

Nick Bowman
Guest
Nick Bowman

That’s one way to deal with fake news…

plaNETerry invAsian
Guest
plaNETerry invAsian

That’ll leave a mark

Mr Bell
Guest
Mr Bell

Stories like this really do undermine the notion that Russian forces are currently a threat. Although I guess sheer weight of numbers and weapons system would likely overwhelm our small but superior military.
just as well we have our tough and ready EU allies to help defend us…oh wait a minute maybe not that tough, or ready, or prepared, or willing, or even that friendly. EU massive Brexit bill anyone? That will be £60-120 billion for your democratic vote to leave.

Jameson
Guest
Jameson

Our defence isn’t made by EU it’s by NATO so Brexit has nothing to do with it

KieranC
Guest
KieranC

“EU massive Brexit bill anyone?” What do you think the Brexit bill should be? And why? What obligations that were agreed by 28 countries should now be paid for by 27? What British EU pensions do you want to or not want to pay? The British government has already agreed we need to pay a sum, we’re just negotiating how much of the laibilities we need to pay. Google “Brexit bill explained” there is a good FT article you can read among others showing that this isn’t a number picked from thin air, the entire bill is costed from their… Read more »

Mr Bell
Guest
Mr Bell

Thanks for your polite comments Kieran. obviously the Brexit bill needs to be as low as possible. The national audit office put the figure at between £7 and 11 billion. This is for our committed and signed up expenditure into the EU project. So far, far less than the £120 billion the EU initially asked for and the now £60 billion they are trying for. yes it is a negotiation and you will always have debate and differences of opinion but this is not that, this is greed. The EU is playing with fire. The world is watching the Brexit… Read more »

KieranC
Guest
KieranC

Thanks for the reply, No it’s still around £100 billion they are asking for but that’s gross, net is £60 billion when you take into account what we would be getting back. “yes it is a negotiation and you will always have debate and differences of opinion but this is not that, this is greed.” There is no proof that it is greed, what they have asked for is fully costed, basically they are asking for the maximum amount they could get away with asking, they know they won’t get that amount but that’s where you start in negotiations, this… Read more »