Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon stated that British dual nationals are permitted to serve in recognised foreign military forces like the Israel Defence Force, as the Foreign Enlistment Act 1870 does not apply to the situation in Gaza.

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office), stated:

“The UK recognises the right of British nationals with more than one nationality to serve in the legitimately recognised armed forces of their additional nationalities. This includes the Israel Defence Force.

With respect to the current conflict in Gaza, Section 4 of the Foreign Enlistment Act 1870 makes it an offence for a British subject to enlist in the military of a foreign state at war with another foreign state with which the UK is at peace. That prohibition does not extend, however, to enlistment in a foreign government’s forces which are engaged in a civil war or combating terrorism or internal uprisings. The Occupied Palestinian Territories are not currently recognised as a state by the UK. The 1870 Act therefore does not apply in this instance.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

42 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

John
John (@guest_810083)
3 months ago

“Genocide”? You mean a nations right to defend itself against terrorists? Oct 7th 2023. Go wise up.

Graham M
Graham M (@guest_810162)
3 months ago
Reply to  John

No-one would consider the killing of Hamas terrorists to be genocide.
The debate is about the killing of very large numbers of non-combatants.

Yes
Yes (@guest_810163)
3 months ago
Reply to  John

The establishment of the Jewish state and the subsequent occupation of the neighbouring territories is nothing but lebensraum, but for the Jews.
I’d be totally supportive of them (wonderful people ofc) if Hezbollah attacked a synagogue in Rome, Moscow or new York.

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_810218)
3 months ago
Reply to  John

Well saidJohn

Jon
Jon (@guest_810086)
3 months ago

Genocide: a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.

Terrorist groups like Hamas don’t count as any of those categories.

BobA
BobA (@guest_810096)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jon

No, Hamas Doesn’t, but the Palestinian people do. And Israel’s prosecution of the operation almost certainly breaks the requirements for proportionality laid down in the LOAC. If we had operated like that in Helmand, I guarantee we’d have been in court and vilified across the world. There is a strange double standard on the go in the West at the moment where we look at Kiev and Russian indiscriminate destruction and cry foul. And yet we say that Israel has every right… I know it isn’t as back and white as that, but it’s pretty stark. I fully support the… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_810107)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

“ The only logical reason for the October attack was to spike an overreaction by Israel”

Sadly, as much as I support Israel’s right to self defence, you are right. They predictably over react…….

When the initial atrocity was perpetrated nobody could be seen to criticise Isreal.

They have over reacted and played into Putin and Xi’s geopolitical hands. I hope that shell factory of ours is running 24/7/365 the sand is running through the hour glass.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_810168)
3 months ago

Sadly and most worrying I think your last statement is the most pertinent…but you also needed to add Tehran to that mix as we have 3 major enemies and one big opportunist ( North Korea) and a number of satellite states ( Belarus, armenia, Kazakhstan, krgzstan, Tajikistan and Irans proxies) , if everything goes south in a worst case realistic war, the west will be fighting all four major powers and their allies at the same time….it’s not a pleasant thought and will stretch the west militarily, let alone politically, economically and industrially capacity wise…….. I think that’s the big… Read more »

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_810120)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

And here in the posts of BoBA and Supportive Bloke we see their moral bankruptcy even if they -hopefully-not even realise. Tell me if Israel did not have invested in Iron Dome and Israel had 20000 deaths where was that “proportionality”? So for BoBA and Supportive Bloke to authorise Israel destroy Hamas, the Israel Government should let 20000 of their citizens die. So Israel should adopt the Hamas tactics of wanting many their own civilians deaths to get political sympathy. It is not enough that Hamas existence would keep killing Israelis as the opportunities or new technologies arises. So was… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by AlexS
BobA
BobA (@guest_810124)
3 months ago
Reply to  AlexS

Alex, you misunderstand proportionality. It’s not a literal eye for an eye. The LOAC demands (and Israel is a signatory and given where the modern state of Israel comes from historically should understand more than most states) that all care should be taken to minimise civilian casualties. You only have to take one look at the neighbourhoods in Gaza to realise that it really hasn’t been doing that. That is where their response hasn’t been proportional. I know the reality of war, I’ve fought in two of them as an infantry officer. But it doesn’t have to include the complete… Read more »

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_810183)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

Spot on!

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_810223)
3 months ago
Reply to  Airborne

Hiya Mate, how are tricks?

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_810222)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

That’s a fascinating insightful post Bob, well written!

Tomartyr
Tomartyr (@guest_810122)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

Mostly agree but Russia isn’t a fair analogy because it’s not defending itself

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_810175)
3 months ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

You would not believe the number of young people who make direct comparisons between Ukraine and Gaza. Somehow a terrorist group has the same rights and authority as an elected government. The fall back is, as ever “But what about the Genocide” but what I see in Gaza isn’t the targeting of civilians, it’s just a lack of empathy. Israel just doesn’t particularly mind, short of the damage to reputation, about how many non-israelis die. (Palestinians aren’t being targeted, they’re just whoever happened to be in the way). Now everything that goes wrong must be blamed on somebody somewhere who… Read more »

ChrisLondon
ChrisLondon (@guest_810188)
3 months ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Even there I think you are being anti-Israeli. Hamas are the democratically elected government of Gaza, indeed far more so than the Nazis ever were in Germany. The Israelis would be morally justified in just bombing Gaza until all hostiges are released. We have all signed up for ‘international laws’ that ban this. This is a mistake we should aknowledge and renounce. These ‘laws’ are only followed by the good and ignored by the evil. This situation will continue until there is a legitimate world government that can enforce them. Until we reach that point all ‘international laws’ are just… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_810166)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

Sadly I think you are right from what we can see it looks like Israeli has gone over the proportionality line…but on the balance side Hamas has done its level best to purposefully drive Israel over that line. Hate begets hate and in the end it’s usually the innocent that suffer most…Israel really needs to destroy Hamas..Hamas have buried themselves within a civilian population.. We also need to undertake some self reflection as well, would we as a nation react differently if faced with the same..the US and it’s allies after all unleashed the war on terror on the world… Read more »

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_810182)
3 months ago
Reply to  BobA

No rant, total agreement. As many have said from day one, Hamas knew the Israeli response would be excessive and prolonged, and they were were quite happy to use both Isreali and Palestinian people as useful collateral to further their oppressive thought process. They have certainly won the propaganda war with the Western nations for sure. No government can ignore the middle class white useful fools, and the Islamist vote, a few months shy of a possible election.

Paul Corcoran
Paul Corcoran (@guest_810100)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jon

You are of course correct. But, the innocent women and children surely do.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking (@guest_810102)
3 months ago

The population of Gaza doubled in the 18 years after Israel surrendered the territory (and Egypt refused to assume control). That is the first increase of a population suffering genocide in recorded history. Hamas is claiming civilian losses that defy expectations – apparently unaware that most authorities warned Israel of civilian deaths in six figures if a ground assault against Iran’s proxies in Gaza were to proceed. Text messaging, broadcasts and leaflet drops warned civilians of coming ground operations and this must be the reason the quoted numbers are so low. Food supplies going into Gaza via the Egyptian border… Read more »

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_810119)
3 months ago

The only Genocide is what Palestinians want to do and say they want to do.

Tomartyr
Tomartyr (@guest_810123)
3 months ago

I don’t know why people would reply to a comment about the ICJ genocide case without knowing about it but apparently people will do that. 🤷‍♂️

Last edited 3 months ago by Tomartyr
John
John (@guest_810132)
3 months ago
Reply to  Tomartyr

The “motion” was brought by the ANC. Funny that they have a historical axe to grind with Israel eh? So they did it before they are booted out of government later this year. Study some history.

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_810145)
3 months ago
Reply to  John

While I feel very sorry for the innocent civilians in Gaza, the Hamas regime carried out a calculated atrocity that’s hard to understand in its unfathomable depravity and brutality. They created a situation of total war in effect, it should have been no suprise that Israel dropped the hammer…. Hamas need to surrender, if they gave the remotest shit about the Palestinians, they would. They put their bunkers and facilities under schools and hospitals. Hamas must take full responsibility, they lit the match and unleashed hell on their heads. We all know Iran is the puppet master here, coordinating, training… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by John Clark
Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_810225)
3 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

excellent commentary John

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_810235)
3 months ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Cheers mate, what a depressing time we live in….

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_810180)
3 months ago

Ah the oft overused term genocide, the same terminology my local socialist workers clowns were shouting about in Colchester today! Ah those 3 blokes were the most useful fools to Hamas, wonder if they will ever realise it!

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_810237)
3 months ago
Reply to  Airborne

I doubt it mate, the hatred of the Jews burns very deep within some of the socialists, Starmers mob are working overtime, desperately trying to keep a lid on them….

ChrisLondon
ChrisLondon (@guest_810184)
3 months ago

If the ICJ rules against Israel it will just mean they have redefined genocide even further to cover good, justifiable acts as well as evil. This is something that is already there in its current definitions.

dc647
dc647 (@guest_810304)
3 months ago

I don’t think the UK should intervene between Iran and Israel. Israel has gone from to defender to aggressor they have broken international law and even after the west condemned some attacks they still continue with their all out tactics no matter how many civilians are killed. The UK are on the righteous side in Ukraine but I don’t think this is the case with Israel. If the west intervene in this way Israel thinks it has the wests approval. All arms trade with Israel should be suspended until Israel pulls back to a defensive stance then let the aid… Read more »

Tomartyr
Tomartyr (@guest_810306)
3 months ago
Reply to  dc647

truth

rst 2001
rst 2001 (@guest_810323)
3 months ago
Reply to  dc647

My take with Iran is, its a very aggressive colonolial empirical type state . If we get the map out we can see it has control or majority control of Iraq , Syria ,Lebanon , Yemen and Gaza . Its secret service are also aggressive abroad and definitely active in uk . So when Hezbollah , Gaza or Syrian militia fire missiles into Israel like they have been doing before the Iran embassy in Syria incident , its all done by the order of Iran and its republican guard. So puts Israel in a difficult situation . Granted bombing the… Read more »

Expat
Expat (@guest_810580)
3 months ago
Reply to  rst 2001

Iran leadership isn’t even a friend to its own people.

Expat
Expat (@guest_810579)
3 months ago
Reply to  dc647

Was Isreal the aggressor reference Iran. Isreal has never threatened to wipe Iran from the map. So any act to prevent such an action could be said to be legitimate which includes targeting build up of weapons and command and control structures within Iran sphere of influence. Also Isreal never claim responsibility for the attack that Iran responded to, if Iran has evidence it should have gone to the UN with evidence and called for an international team to investigate the incident. But probably that team would have uncovered evidence of other unsavoury activities that Iran was doing at the… Read more »

Callum
Callum (@guest_810707)
3 months ago
Reply to  dc647

Israel has gone from to defender to aggressor That’s not how it works. Hamas launched an assault on Israel, the Israelis are retaliating. Unless Hamas surrenders and Israel doesn’t stop, they don’t get to claim Israel is the one attacking them. As for the international law argument, terrorism is against international law. Cutting the heads off of innocent civilians is against international law. Using civilians as human shields is against international law (I think, I need to double check that one). There is no “righteous” side when it comes to this kind of war. This isn’t a conflict between two… Read more »

dc647
dc647 (@guest_810733)
3 months ago
Reply to  Callum

Spoken like a true civvy nice and safe in your nice warm cosy home. Israel has crossed a line it doesn’t matter if Hamas was using a hospital or civilians as shields you don’t use indiscriminate bombing and then try and blame Hamas. I’ve seen friends killed because leaders are trying to prove a point. It takes a bigger person to say ok we’ve proved our point then they can take the moral high ground. If we get drawn into a conflict I hope to see you sign up and I’ll see you on the front line.

Callum
Callum (@guest_810769)
3 months ago
Reply to  dc647

I’m sorry for your loss, but it’s a tad hypocritical to demand Israel stops when under the same circumstances we did the same. During the Second World War, we burnt large parts of Germany to the ground, civilians and all, to defeat the Nazis and the the threat to our civilisation they represented. While we might express regret that such actions were taken, at no point does anyone look back and say “We should’ve stopped when we pushed them back to Germany and given them the chance to surrender”. You don’t leave an existential threat to your people sat on… Read more »

dc647
dc647 (@guest_810799)
3 months ago
Reply to  Callum

During WW2 Britain avoided bombing civilians until Germany started the Blitz and we responded in kind, I don’t agree with those tactics but that was a different time. Nowadays a soldiers main priority is to protect civilians at all costs it’s easy blowing up a building instead of clearing it British soldiers are experts in urban warfare we train to negate the loss of civilian lives. You need to weigh up the loss of civilians to the loss of combatants if civilian loss out weights of the combatants loss then that is crossing a line and you have to take… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by dc647
Callum
Callum (@guest_810823)
3 months ago
Reply to  dc647

It was a different time for us; we’ve had nearly 8 decades without a major threat to the British Isles, and aside from terror attacks we’ve had over 3 decades without even an acknowledged enemy to focus our defence against. Even when we were at war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the country itself was fundamentally at peace. Morality flourishes when survival isn’t on the table. The Israelis haven’t had that luxury. They founded a country in the aftermath of a world war that Jewish people suffered pretty badly in, only to spend most of the next century being told to… Read more »

dc647
dc647 (@guest_810828)
3 months ago
Reply to  Callum

You can ask that question over and over no one knows till it happens it only takes one to show good faith. If I was on the ground and Hamas attack a safe zone we would respond. But why would Hamas attack a Palestinian safe zone it would be counter productive since in their mind they are fighting for the freedom of Palestine. I don’t think we will ever see eye to eye because we have got different perspectives of war.

ChrisLondon
ChrisLondon (@guest_810462)
3 months ago

Have 29 comments been deleted? What happened?

David Owen
David Owen (@guest_810486)
3 months ago

The British people serving are Jews by religion, if they step into Israel they get called up for national service if they are settled there ,I’m