US Defence Secretary James N. Mattis said he sees no change in Russia’s military capability in light of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent speech in which he said Russia has nuclear weapons capable of attacking the United States.

The secretary called Putin’s remarks “disappointing, but unsurprising”.

Mattis spoke with reporters aboard a plane bound for Oman as part of an overseas trip designed to strengthen relationships.

“I looked at President Putin’s speech, and like many of us, I focused on the last third of it,” Mattis said.

“The first two-thirds [was] clearly about domestic issues, but also opportunities in that first two-thirds, as I was reading it.  And I tried to forget that I … knew what the last third was about — that you would actually see opportunities there to reduce the tensions between the NATO countries, the Western countries, the nations that want to live by international law, maintain sovereignty and territorial integrity of everyone, and the Russian Federation.”

The secretary said his role is to make strategic assessments, and that he saw no change to the Russian military capability in Putin’s remarks. The systems the Russian president talked about “are still years away,” the secretary said, adding that he doesn’t see them changing the military balance.

“They do no impact any need on our side for a change in our deterrent posture, which would be certainly an indication I registered this assessment with something that was changing,” Mattis said.

Moscow’s cancellation of scheduled strategic security talks shows a Russia that’s not even acting in its own best interests, he added.

19
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
12 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
12 Comment authors
P tattersallStuart WillardDavidStevenSteve M Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
maurice10
Guest
maurice10

It’s all part of Putin’s game. Some information may be exaggerated or even false, however, for those countries that border Russian, the facts are immaterial. The psychological pressure remains undiminished and nothing that NATO or the US say, helps to reduce the fear. If true, and Russian military grade ‘chemical’ delivery took place in Salisbury, England, under the orders of Russian authorities, then we should all start to share the common fear. If a sleepy corner of an English town isn’t safe then where is? Maybe Putin had zero knowledge of what was going on, it’s possible some of these… Read more »

reaper
Guest
reaper

Jim Mattis is one extremely effective man. Revered on both sides of the Atlantic by the armed forces. Just wish we had a man of his calibre in the MOD

Albion
Guest
Albion

We do, his name is Gordon Messenger. Hopefully he will be the next CDS

Mr J Bell
Guest
Mr J Bell

Mattie is solid and dependable. Sound military mind. He knows even though Russia might have some new wonder weapons in the pipeline there is a world of difference between prototypes and actual service delivery. Economically I cannot see Russia affording all this high-end capability…..unless China is paying for it.

Ian
Guest
Ian

Don’t underestimate new Russia China collaboration

trackback

[…] post US Defence Sec: No change in Russian military capability in light of Putin’s speech appeared first on UK Defence […]

dadsarmy
Guest
dadsarmy

If any reasonable size country were to concentrate resources on one aspect of defence, chances are it could make itself a world leader. So what Putin says Russia is doing is not impossible, if it were spending 50% or more of its defence budget on it, combined wth the equivalent civilian spend on associated tech. The UK could probably do the same.

So a question is, what percentage is Russia spending in its conventional defence, seems to me the answer is, not a lot.

Ian
Guest
Ian

Indeed true. Putin understands he can’t compete across the board so he chooses his weapons programs carefully. He’s effectively abandoned his blue water navy capability including aircraft carriers. So, he’s focused on huge nuke stocks because that’s the ultimate deterrent (or threat), coastal defence, AA capability, subs and enough land armour innovation to make NATO think twice on land. His stance is to counter NATO strength. You want to risk your new stealth fighters – come and try our new air defences, you want to bring your aircraft carriers in range, try our subs etc.

David
Guest
David

Well put Ian – Russian air defence systems in particular – such as the S400 – are excellent and would give NATO and Israeli planners headaches. Not that they can’t be overcome but done so at a cost – hence your point.

P tattersall
Guest
P tattersall

Absolute rubbish the Russians have sold the s400 to turkey a NATO partner it can’t be up to much the yanks and UK will have had a good look at it ..

Steven
Guest
Steven

“Western countries, the nations that want to live by international law, maintain sovereignty and territorial integrity of everyone, and the Russian Federation.” What planet does this guy live on ? Mad Dog indeed. Look at what the US is doing in Syria ! GTF OUT !!!

Andy G
Guest

I’m with Mad Dog, who wouldnt want that?

Steven
Guest
Steven

The US, clearly !!!

Steve M
Guest
Steve M

Look at what Syria is doing in Syria….

Steven
Guest
Steven

Fighting Islamic fundamentalists who being supported by hostile foreign powers, i wish them every success.

Steve M
Guest
Steve M

Certainly not using chemical weapons or indiscriminately targeting civilians aye?

Steven
Guest
Steven

Pull the other one, it’s got bells on.

Stuart Willard
Guest

Seeing the comment below clearly Steven is the maddest of mad dogs.

P tattersall
Guest
P tattersall

Its always in the pipe line with Russia but never gets past that stage ..