French magazine Le Point has reported that a Russian aircraft had flown over frigate Aquitaine over the weekend and was fully-armed.

France, the US and allies are considering a military response centred around cruise missile strikes after accusing the Russia-backed Syrian government of being behind a serious chemical weapons attack.

Aquitaine is equipped with 16 cruise missiles and 16 surface-to-air missiles. It is currently operating off Lebanese shores alongside US ships as part of the force fighting Islamic State militants in Syria and Iraq.

“The flight took place several days ago, passes by military aircraft over warships are things that happen at sea. When it is deemed too close, the opposing party is notified” according to a source quoted in Le Point.

The Russian air force has already carried out similar flights over Western warships in the past, pictured below is a Danish ship being buzzed by Russian aircraft.

Image result for French warship buzzed by Russian combat aircraft in mediterranean

The FREMM class, to which Aquitane belongs, is a class of multi-purpose frigates designed for the navies of France and Italy. The lead ship of the class, Aquitaine, was commissioned in November 2012 by the French Navy.

In France the class is known as the Aquitaine class, while in Italy they are known as the Bergamini class. Italy has ordered six general purpose variants and four anti-submarine variants; the last two Italian general purpose FREMMs will have anti-aircraft warfare, anti-ballistic missile and surface attack capabilities.

France has ordered six anti-submarine variants, and two air-defence variants. The class is also one of the five finalists for the US Navy’s FFG(X) program.

84
Leave a Reply

avatar
25 Comment threads
59 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
41 Comment authors
E.csn@hotmail.comMervynFrench warship buzzed by Russian combat aircraft in warning against missile attack | UMMAH NEWS LINKSHelionsJulian Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Nigel Collins
Guest
Nigel Collins

Will we be sending the Type 45’s to protect the American and French navies?
Things are clearly hotting up in the Med and exposing our lack of investment once again at a time when we may verwell regret it.

Chris
Guest
Chris

I was just wondering that. Does anyone know if we actually have any surface vessels deployed in the Med currently? I believe HMS Duncan is currently deployed in the Adriatic. I would hope that with tensions hotting up the MoD have had the foresight to position a Astute or Trafalgar class in the region to carry out strikes if required.

Ben P
Guest
Ben P

We will participate via an Astute with Tomahawk or Storm Shadow from aircraft based out of Akrotiri. Strikes will hit Syrian only sites, worst Russia will do is attempt to shoot down the missiles. They know that attacking a NATO ship opens up WW3.

Ian
Guest
Ian

My take too. I hope we’re right.

John
Guest
John

What gives right NATO to strike Syrian sites? Someone told it was chemical attack without any evidence? Like Iraq, Bosnia(Markale), Kosovo(Rachak)? Just to remind you these were excuses for military interventions and after some time all were proven as misinformation. There is a line. I think Russia will attack NATO ships if they attack Syrian cites. NATO should rethink if they are ready for nuclear war without winner for Syrian oil

spyinthesky
Guest

Thats certainly one weird take, ‘Syrian oil’ where did that one come from, thats always the same refrain isn’t it whatever the evidence or logic of the particular situation this we are discussing. If you want evidence then don’t make stupid claims based on no evidence whatsoever that support them. It has noting to do with Syrian oil and anyone with half a brain would realise that. Whatever action is taken will not make Syrian Oil remotely more available to western use so lets forget that particular Looney tune shall we and stick to the known realities. As for the… Read more »

Charles
Guest

Why do you think the Americans need a Type 45 to protect themselves if thats the case, then they should scrap all their destroyers and cruisers and only rely on the two or three b type 45’s that can be put to sea at any given time. The sm-2 and sm-6 misses are very capable all on their own.

Lusty
Guest
Lusty

In terms of UK assets, I’m not overly sure what exactly is in the region. Duncan visited Croatia recently, and both Enterprise, Echo, and a Point Class vessel are also in the region. Not too sure on frigates or the RFA.

Mikki
Guest
Mikki

rump backpedals on Syria missile threat…………………

Fools(USA and allies) rush where angels(Germany,Italy,Holland) fear to go

Its already 1 up to Russia:
https://russia-insider.com/en/russian-navy-launches-live-fire-exercises-syrian-coast-amid-expected-us-strikes/ri23084

USA,Uk and France should be ashamed of themselves…

Libya…………………………….Failure
Afghanistan…………………..Failure
Iraq………………………………Failure

Every where they fish,they only catch mutant fish..leaving chaos and deaths around achieving no clear goal or vision

Let the wise read and woke up…Don’t get manipulated by the press and your government

spyinthesky
Guest

Yeah Russia is making a great job out of Syria isn’t it. Equally their excursion into Afghanistan was the originator of the present mess. Plenty of other killing fields in the Balkans too we could mention so probably best to have two lenses in your binoculars don’t you think before you mouth off. As for you stoking up the rhetoric seems rather childish don’t your think and perhaps you should be ashamed of yourself don’t you think. It would be far better if everyone cut out the lunacy but Putin and Trump are just two sides of the same coin… Read more »

spyinthesky
Guest

By the way if you are foolish enough to read that as Trump back peddling as the BBC did briefly this morning then you truly are deluded this guy for good or bad will not hold back when he decides to let go. Lets see who is right over sex few days shall we for I see it as simply him muddying the water as to timing not the actual act. Like it or not him not taking action now would make it much more dangerous of the West in the future not less.

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

“Equally their excursion into Afghanistan was the originator of the present mess”

I think you need a history lesson

farouk
Guest
farouk

Nah, The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is been sent to the Med consisting of guided-missile destroyers USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51), USS Bulkeley (DDG 84), USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) and USS Farragut (DDG 99), as well as the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60). The Destroyers USS The Sullivans (DDG 68) and USS Jason Dunham (DDG 109) they will also be joined by the German frigate FGS Hessen (F 221) which by all accounts is a pretty impressive Air defence platform and familiar to the Truman strike group More than enough fire power for the task at… Read more »

Helions
Guest
Helions

This is in addition to the Rota based destroyers of the USN’s European Standing Force. All BMD capable. The Donald Cook which was buzzed today is one of them. Probably at least 1 Ohio class SSGN with 150+ tomahawks loaded and at least a couple of Virginia’s or improved LA class. Putin can only hope his on scene folks there don’t overstep and get their reproductive organs rhinoplasted…

Cheers!

Jack
Guest
Jack

According to Sky News their is an Astute class sub on station in the Med.
Makes more sense than a Type 45 for a missile strike.

Matt
Guest
Matt

I think a Type 45 would be appropriate for air defence in the region – deal with these Russian aircraft.

Charles Ortolano
Guest

I think the “Burks” can provide very good air defense against the Russians. one Burke alone has more than double the anti air power than a Type 45

Matt
Guest
Matt

It’s not a simple matter of counting VLS – which many people tend do to. A “Burke” has a generation old PESA radar system which can only track and fire one missile at the same time and can’t handle saturation attacks. A Type 45 can handle up to 1000 objects and fire the entire load of VLS at once if it needed to. Beyond that, a Type 45 has more advanced electronic warfare capabilities so this scenario would never likely happen.

It’s actually the other way around – one T45 can do the job of many “Burkes”.

Helions
Guest
Helions

Actually, the older BMD capable Burke’s can’t track and shoot at both missiles and and ballistic missiles at the same time. The new Flight 3’s being built rectify that problem with the AMDR.

https://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/amdr/

The Tico cruiser Normandy is the AAW commander and the ship’s AEGIS system will take control of all integrated AAW in the group if it comes to that. It prioritizes, assigns targets, and also the ships which will fire the missiles against the targets which the AEGIS has computed a firing solution. It’s old but very effective.

Cheers!

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

Great comment and well pointed out.

Charles Ortolano
Guest

The updated versions of AEGIS are very capable, the system is continually upgraded, its a far cry from the system that was installed in the ships when built. I doubt a U.S. battle group would be under protected with their own ships I dont believe that they have to beg for a type 45 every time they put to sea. the type 45 with its small missile load out is a bit overated, given that the ship itself has had so many problems.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

The other point to remember is PAAMs is a one shot one kill system, AEGIS and SM-2 is not considered a one shot one kill system so it needs a lot more missiles.

Helions
Guest
Helions

The Hessen seems a little undergunned missile wise for such a large ship. 32 cell launcher with only 24 SM2’s. the rest ESS’s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sachsen-class_frigate

Cheers!

Matt
Guest
Matt

As was previously stated, the 48 VLS on T45 is massive when its sensor and CMS capabilities are taken into account. Burkes need more missiles to have the same kind of effect and are still prone to saturation attacks. It’s like comparing apples with oranges. I’d rather a T45 in that situation than any other AAW.

E.csn@hotmail.com
Guest

That high mounted radar of the type 45 gives it a real advantage over the superstructure ones of the AK

David E Flandry
Guest
David E Flandry

A Type 45 destroyer would have no weapons capable of hitting Syria except for a 4.5 inch gun, and I doubt it wants to get that close to Syria. An Astute however could easily carry a dozen or more cruise missiles, and would launch while submerged, then disappear. Russia has no ASW aircraft in the Med, and cannot cover the Med with ships to detect an Astute or even upgraded Trafalgar SSN .

maurice10
Guest
maurice10

Maybe we might see a new phase of warfare, where hitherto opposing side who have never exchanged blows, actually contemplating albeit limited? The old triggers of the Cold War are no longer considered as relevant if political commitments are to be made good. Limited US /Russian conflict may be a strong possibility in the coming years. If it’s not over Syria then some other unsuspecting nation. Russia is now a truly global military player, and will want to expand its overseas bases to ensure the West knows the score and risks? The US is still by far the most powerful… Read more »

dave12
Guest
dave12

Russia is only a local power it does not have the money or means in naval power anyway to project its power ,putin is just throwing the last dice as Russia will decline in the future, he knows that and thats what makes him dangerouse

farouk
Guest
farouk

Russia is now a truly global military player, Actually it isn’t as Dave 12 points out. It is only able to deploy to Syria as it already had a base there. Its biggest asset is Nuclear, however in a conventional setting, it hasn’t the means to transport, sustain a sizeable force. (remember it didn’t get the Mistrals it wanted) and other than its SF, the rest of the armed forces are pretty piss poor as seen in Georgia, Chetneya and Dagestan(during the Beslan hostage taking) whilst Putin has ordered his generals to sort that out, the miltary is still gripped… Read more »

maurice10
Guest
maurice10

I stand by my thoughts that Russian needs to demonstrate its global reach. To maintain the vision that Putin appears to be creating, Russia needs to enlarge its international profile as seen in various countries of late. Sirya fits into that doctrine and Russia will be acutely aware of not wanting to be seen to be backing away from its obligations. If a conflict between the West and East is unavoidable, I’m sure it would be short-lived but, I fear Russia’s response would be immediately effective and damaging. In such a scenario, logistic capabilities and possible long-term weakness in its… Read more »

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

Russia is effectively a dying nation, it has very little in the way of wealth creation other than oil and gas both of which will become less effective at income generation as the west becomes more energy self sufficient over the next couple of decades, more importantly it’s population is decreasing quite rapidly at around 0.5% year, with both life expectancy and birth rates dropping significantly.

Russia is essentially doomed as even a regional power of any significance, this does make it dangerous at present.

Helions
Guest
Helions

You’re right Jonathan,

The Chinese are already eyeing Siberia across the Amur. Putin knows this… Not much they can do about it come about 2050 or so when Russia basically loses the ability to be a great power due to lack of population. China will move then.

Cheers

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

Any Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline would reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian gas I think.

maurice10
Guest
maurice10

All nations are dying according to some schools of thought. Russia’s capability today is what concerns me now. We should all be concerned by what you are prophesying, as dying beast tend to lash out!

Mervyn
Guest
Mervyn

Ever thought with a £2-£3 billion monthly trade deficit why we are so keen to go to war?? Given your views on Russia!

Why do you think this action has been taken over the holiday period whilst parliament is in recess? why didn’t war monger May recall parliament before going to war?

This could all turn very nasty, and it seems all you are concerned about is what type of weapons we might have or not, I think that is pretty dim.

Steven
Guest
Steven

The Ukraine springs to mind.

Jonny
Guest
Jonny

The UK’s sovereign bases in Cyprus seem very vulnerable; the Russians could put a non fly zone over Cyprus, and could in extremis attack the airfield. UK has no ability to counter cruise missiles or Iskander SSMs. Brits reliant on USN SM3 and French and Italian Aster 30. ALARM was taken out of service years ago so UK has no anti-radar capability either.

Freshman
Guest
Freshman

We have Land Ceptor but I am not sure how many we have in service with the RAF regiment, but the can engage missiles and aircraft.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

None.

RAF Regiment had its SHORAD Squadrons cut years ago.

Rapier FSC with 16 Regiment RA and they are not in Cyprus.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

Are we moving HMS Duncan from the Black Sea into the Med. She could provide cover for Akrotiri.

Steve
Guest
Steve

We would be nuts to fire an insanely expensive tomahawk missile, in a half hearted attack (i doubt we really intend to take out the syrian regime). Only the US can afford to do something like that. My expectation is we will provide midair refueling or surveillance and nothing more.

Watch me eat my words.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

Is it feasible for Tornados and Brimstone to cripple Assads helicopter fleet? If so that would be a suitable punishment. Swamp the S-400s with Tomahawks from the west and attack from the east with US and French aircraft out Qatar?

Nick Bowman
Guest
Nick Bowman

I wonder whether it is significant that the threat to strike the missile launch systems (aircraft, ships and submarines) was made by General Gerasimov rather than Putin himself. I’m also concerned that the Russians would use a NATO strike as a pretext for a ramping up of tensions in the Baltics. They have the ability to launch and sustain effective military operations in that area.

Helions
Guest
Helions
Chris
Guest
Chris

(Chris H) Sadly we are playing Putin’s game and only he knows the rules. He is provoking the USA and the UK to do something barely legal (we cannot get UN approval as was proved this week) which will allow him to do whatever he pleases ‘in defence of my country’ if any Russian people are injured or assets damaged. And of course he already has the ‘damaged assets’ set up in a hangar in Syria. He has been able to play us for a bunch of mugs because we respect International Law and he doesn’t. And because we (the… Read more »

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

I agree with a lot of that Chris especially the last few paragraphs but just to add, under international law and according to the UN Assad is a legal democratically elected leader who officially asked Russia and Iran for assistance, the only countries who are there legally are in fact Russia and Iran, Syria is a sovereign state and any country conducting military operations in that country including the US, Israel and Turkey are actually breaking international law. Not long ago Assad was riding down the mall staying in the Queens bedroom, but of course that was when Syria was… Read more »

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

Queens spare bedroom that should say!! haha

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

Going to be one of the odd ones out here but I think we should stay well out of it, I see Donald Trump has been well and truly devoured by the American deep state. If anyone genuinely believes Assad would gas his own people a few days after Trump said he wants to pull US troops out of Syria they need their heads testing. I see the BBC and Guardian are in full playing the drumbeats of war mode. I’m not going to post links again because of moderation but the times of Israel and the BBC both have… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

I agree with your last paragraph. I’d suggest what is happening to white farmers in former Rhodesia would also be worthy.

I take your other points too.

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

?

Ian
Guest
Ian

There have numerous genocides carried out in Burma, since late 1940’s. The Karen have been fighting for independence for over 60 years, the British promised them autonomy upon independence, but they have endured massacres and ethnic cleansing ever since, and they are only one minority group, Shan state, Kachin people have all suffered, and no one came to their aid. The Rohingya are seen as Bengali immigrants or indentured workers who shouldn’t be there and the Burmese military used to butchering other minorities is used to these tactics.

Harold
Guest
Harold

How sad. How very, very sad. Not in my name.

Veterans for Peace – http://vfpuk.org/

DaveyB
Guest
DaveyB

The Sovereign airbase on Cyprus is highly vulnerable. For starters it has no ground based air defence. Further the aircraft that take off from the base are within the engagement envelop of the S400 system. The obvious answer would be to put a T45 off the coast. But could we afford to place a ship this capable on a continuous cruise off the coast just in case? Possibly for the short term until the sabre rattling dues down, however what is need is a permanent GBAD system perhaps CAMM based there! Has anyone picked up on the rumour that Russia… Read more »

DaveyB
Guest
DaveyB

Sorry for the typos.

Paul T
Guest
Paul T

Davey – yes the SU57’s were there but that was part of a roadshow to help with Mr Putin’s re-election,they have since returned to Russia.

Andy Brown
Guest
Andy Brown

SoleSurvivor, I am with you on this one. There is an over hasty rush to blame Assad for the gas attack without the evidence to back it up. An attack on Assad now will merely prolong the war and play into the hands of IS and the other jihadist groups who make up the main opposition (leaving aside the Kurds who are our most obvious allies, but whom we have betrayed to placate the ‘Little Sultan’ in Ankara). Do we really think a bunch of Islamists backed by the ‘fascist’ regimes of Turkey and Saudi Arabia are a better alternative… Read more »

Andy Brown
Guest
Andy Brown

Sorry meant to go on and say I would also question the talk of chemical weapons as a red line event. It makes little difference to people if they are blown up or gassed, the effect is the same… they suffer, die and are lost to loved ones! I find the notion that chemical weapons are somehow worse a rather offensive notion. A person who gasses innocent men, women and children is no worse than someone who blows them to bits with artillery shells or executes them with a pistol.

SoleSurvivor
Guest
SoleSurvivor

Couldn’t agree more Andy.

Interesting point about the chemical weapon red line, it’s like yeah kill civilians by normal munitions and we will be upset, but use chemical weapons and it’s a red line and we will get involved, doesn’t make that much sense but then not a lot does in this debacle.

trackback

[…] Russian combat aircraft buzz French warship – warning against missile attack […]

Jas.
Guest
Jas.

Russia is where we were 30 yrs ago, Still thinking its a global super power with in reality nothing but its nukes ( albeit impressive nukes ) & some limited aging conventional weapons systems, An Economy the size of Italy cant stand up to America & Putin when pushed wouldn’t dare to.
the West should strike Syria with Force so they think twice before using chemical weapons again .

Elliott
Guest
Elliott

Never assume sanity in matters of all consuming Pride and the most fickle and sacred of virtues Honor. Did Japan think it could win all out war with America? No. Did Emperor Franz Josef have any choice but to attempt avenging himself and his country on Serbia? Did every other major Combatant truly have a choice after that or were they prisoners of their own Honor and Duty and as all wielders of power and influence not a little Pride? Do you think men like General Robert E. Lee and General Joseph Johnston or their President Jeff Davis really believed… Read more »

geoff
Guest
geoff

Elliot-only read your post after I had sent mine and must admit you make the same point much more eloquently. It is a depressing certainty that we will have another World War some time in the future and that it will probably signal the end of Mankinds stay on the planet. There are egos aplenty all round-in Israel,Iran,Syria,the USA and many Western nations and of course arguably no. 1, Putin’s Russia. The alignment of the planets has placed the unpredictable and not very bright Donald Trump in the White House. His erratic behaviour-one day insulting Kim the next wanting to… Read more »

Helions
Guest
Helions

Actually Franz Josef was rather alarmed by the response of his Prime Minister (he was away from Vienna I believe) but he reluctantly went along when told that the KuK armed forces HAD to respond to such an open challenge. He should have said NO obviously in hindsight.

Cheers!

Jeroen
Guest
Jeroen

For your information, the photo you have is F-805 HMS EVERTSEN, a Dutch Air Command Frigate.

Geoff
Guest
Geoff

We are facing an extraordinarily dangerous situation and could literally be engaged in a Nuclear War within a few days. Enjoy participating in these discussions but am surprised by the matter of fact tone of some of the above posts discussing this peril as though we all planning to take part in computer war games! The massive traumas experienced on are planet in history have often been initiated by the egos or foibles around single individuals-Archduke Ferdinand comes to mind! In this case we have Putin suffering from chronic and incurable”Small Man Syndrome”. This character with his soccer fan bravado… Read more »

Geoff
Guest
Geoff

Edit Facility please UKDJ…our planet…

Chris
Guest
Chris

(Chris H) It will take a very brave Theresa May to acknowledge the truth, stand up and say to Trump ‘This aggression will be illegal and we are having no part of it’. She could show what happened in Iraq when Bush and Blair made the same mistake and we have precedent because we declined to follow Obama in lobbing Tomahawks at Syria years ago. As someone else pointed out whether we like it or not Syria is an independent, sovereign Nation State and we cannot just go invading / attacking because it does something in its own territory we… Read more »

Steve M
Guest
Steve M

The French have proof apparently. We shall see.

Chris
Guest
Chris

(Chris H) Steve M – So if it is Assad we still have no legal basis for attacking his country. And if it is Israel (or another 3rd party) then surely we would be attacking the victims … either way we come out looking rather stupid ….

Steve M
Guest
Steve M

Frankly if it ends with the use of chemical weapons in Syria being stopped I don’t particularly care if it was legal.

Pete murdoch
Guest
Pete murdoch

Presumably desire would be a T 45 and a T23 in close proximity covering off all the possibilities of Russian action.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

Agreed. Type 45 to defend Akrotiri and Type 23 to deter any Russian subs

DaveyB
Guest
DaveyB

Russia have sortied a pair of corvettes to shadow the USN from its port in Syria as stated in the Times today.
Are people seriously suggesting the chemical attack was carried out by Israel, they would have nothing to gain. The attack would have carried out by Assad’s lot as he’s has previous for the chlorine/sarin cocktail as has been identified. Further it has been reported that the attack was carried out because the rebels who surrendered Ghouta refused to give up their weapons when leaving.

Julian
Guest
Julian

Aquitaine is a nice looking ship. I know our T23s are good sub hunters and have given sterling service but in a world of flat, sloping sided, fullwidth superstructures with minimal external clutter to reduce RCS I can’t stop myself thinking how dated they look. Then again, that’s also true of the Arleigh Burkes, and don’t even get me started on the Ticos. I know, it’s all about functionality not looks but I still can’t stop myself having at least an initial reaction to the aesthetics of various ships even if I do ultimately dismiss it in favour of judging… Read more »

Helions
Guest
Helions

Funny Julian, I was thinking the exact same thing looking at the picture of the HMS Sutherland in a previous article. Without denying the effectiveness of an updated T23 (or AB or Tico for our navy) they certainly look dated. I’ll bet the next CGX large surface combatant for the USN will look a lot like a Zumwalt – perhaps without the tumblehome hull if that proves problematic on the current class.

Cheers!

Helions
Guest
Helions
tim sinnett
Guest

I have to say, when you look at an American carrier group, it has such a range and scale of capabilities. AB’s have 96 mk 41, Rico’s even more md there are several of each type. BMD capable, torpedos and multiple missile types including anti ship and land attack. Although our ships are capable in specific areas, you have to ask the question if our carrier group will have all the tools it needs to face any situation. Low on silo numbers for saturation attacks, very few missiles for actually attacking etc. We base a whole capability on one ship,… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

They are a superpower.

We are a major power.

We can only do do much with the budget available, which is more than most.

Otherwise agree with all of your comment.

DaveyB
Guest
DaveyB

The carrier is not totally helpless if a F35 can’t do a rolling take off as they can still take off/land vertically. Yes it will have either a reduced payload or fuel load but it will still get in the sky and perform a CAP. I still find it perplexing that the T45 is still by rights an anti aircraft platform with a relatively small SAM load. It has the capability to be so much more, so why isn’t it? Russia/Putin must play out the situation, they can’t back down else they loose face and credibility. Trump will never back… Read more »

David E Flandry
Guest
David E Flandry

President Trump relies on his military staff for military advice. He knows what he doesn’t know, where he needs advice. That’s how he operated his businesses, that’s how he operates as president. His ‘instability” and “stupidity” are greatly talked about but he went from $40 million to $2.5 billion net worth. Unstable stupid people don’t do that. He likes to be underestimated and likes to keep opponents guessing. The US does not need anyone’s help, but would like to know our greatest ally at least is not actively opposed.

Julian
Guest
Julian

When T26 comes into service we will get at least some Mk41 so, with sensible missile choices, could add a second attack capability in our CBG in addition to the F-35Bs. Nothing like the number of Mk41 silos in a US CBG I grant you but, as Daniele pointed out, we are never going to be the USA. On T45, with only 6 likely yielding only 2 deployable at any given time and at least one CBG needing protection at any given time, I think it is OK to accept that T45 is a dedicated AAW asset and treat it… Read more »

trackback

[…] French warship buzzed by Russian combat aircraft in warning against missile attack https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/french-warship-buzzed-by-russian-combat-aircraft-in-warning-against-… […]

Helions
Guest
Helions

Hand in Hand with farouk’s post above:

Some inaccuracies in labeling photos here but a good breakdown of the USN forces in the area.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5611419/Trumps-armada-Huge-task-force-12-warships-sets-sail-Syria.html

Cheers!

trackback

[…] is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/french-warship-buzzed-by-russian-combat-aircraft-in-warning-against-&#8230😉 reduced by 69%. (I’m a bot) ***** > French magazine Le Point has reported that a Russian […]