HMS Agamemnon, the Royal Navy’s sixth Astute-class attack submarine, has left BAE Systems’ yard at Barrow-in-Furness and entered open water for the first time as it begins sea trials ahead of joining the fleet, according to BAE Systems.
The 7,400-tonne, 97-metre submarine moved through the shipyard’s dock system into the Walney Channel before continuing into the Irish Sea. Agamemnon will now undergo a programme of sea trials before joining HMS Astute, HMS Ambush, HMS Artful, HMS Audacious and HMS Anson in Royal Navy service.
Steve Timms, Managing Director of BAE Systems’ Submarines business, said: “The Astute class submarines are equipped with the latest technologies to silently circumnavigate the globe without surfacing, whilst fulfilling a range of tactical roles for the Royal Navy.
“The departure of HMS Agamemnon, the sixth of seven such submarines that we are building here in Barrow, demonstrates the growing momentum underpinning our submarines business and is a proud moment for everyone involved across the UK’s submarine enterprise.”
First Sea Lord General Sir Gwyn Jenkins said Agamemnon would move to HMNB Clyde after sea trials and join the Royal Navy’s operational submarine force. He said: “In an increasingly dangerous world, sea power remains fundamental to keeping our country and people safe. Our submarine fleet is essential to that effort, which is why I am delighted that HMS Agamemnon, the sixth of our Astute-class submarines, has now begun sea trials and will soon arrive at HMNB Clyde to join the fleet.
“She embodies the best of British engineering and the professionalism of our submariners and will be one of the most advanced submarines ever operated by the Royal Navy.
“As we continue to strengthen our warfighting readiness, HMS Agamemnon will play a central role in keeping the United Kingdom safe, contributing to NATO’s collective defence and ensuring we are ready to lead, fight and win.”
Work is meanwhile continuing on Achilles, the seventh and final Astute-class submarine, which BAE Systems said is at an advanced stage of construction. The Barrow yard is also building all four Dreadnought-class ballistic missile submarines which will replace the Royal Navy’s Vanguard-class boats carrying the UK’s nuclear deterrent.
BAE Systems is also carrying out early design and concept work on SSN-AUKUS, the next generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines intended eventually to replace the Astute class. The company and the wider Defence Nuclear Enterprise are expanding infrastructure, technology and workforce capacity at Barrow to support the overlapping Astute, Dreadnought and SSN-AUKUS programmes.












World class science, engineering and manufacturing. Keeping us all free. Welcome to the United Kingdom 👏👏👏
It’s good to see an uptick in capability, even a long-overdue one. With the current state of the fleet and the pressure to get Achilles and the Dreadnoughts in service, getting Agamemnon to sea is a significant win.
Tangentially related, I can’t wait for SSN-AUKUS to receive an actual class name. As far as acronyms go, it’s a bit of a mouthful. I wonder what naming scheme we’ll see; the B class would be logical, but the current trend appears to be names with significant meaning or battle honours. Classical monsters would be a great theme; names like HMS Minotaur and Leviathan have long histories in the RN, and monsters work so well for submarines.
HMS Minotaur was one of Nelson’s First Rates at the Battle of the Nile. There were 12 British First Rates engaged in this battle to match the potentially 12 AUKUS submarines. Well, there were 13 actually but one ran into shoals and was stranded before it could join the battle. Besides, I doubt many of us north of the border would be overly keen on a new HMS Culloden. The Nile class.
Nelson’s Minotaur wasn’t a first-rate; there were only three first-rates in the fleet at Trafalgar.
I get what you’re going for, but a decent proportion of those ship names are already in use with other vessels or shore establishments.
Thank you for figuring out what I meant. The term I should have used was Ship of the Line not First Rate.
Thanks Callum for a bit of fun
There has not been a history of named B class subs in the Royal Navy but here a re a list of some previous ships with illustrious names
However how about these
HMS Black Prince
HMS Boadicea
HMS Bellerphon
HMS Bellona
HMS Blake
HMS Beatty
HMS Benbow
HMS Boscawen
HMS Blenheim
HMS Bulldog
HMS Bloodhound
HMS Baisilisk
HMS Broadsword
HMS Battleaxe
HMS Boxer
HMS Brave
HMS Biter
Loads more
Any more suggestions
B class is a good suggestion to follow the Astutes.
I wanted Is for the T83s but CCV doesn’t really match up to the grandeur of the names.
I’d skip ‘B’ (Dreadnought should’ve been ‘B’) and move onto ‘C’, because that gives you access to an easy slam dunk:
HMS Commonwealth (UK-Australia joint programme, come on, it’s perfect)
HMS Centaur
HMS Chivalrous
HMS Cerberus
HMS Crescent
HMS Challenger (also has Australian heritage)
HMS Charybdis
HMS Chariot (apparently never been used before, despite being awesome)
HMS Chieftain
HMS Churchill (probably wouldn’t fly today, still very cool)
HMS Crusader (another that’d never work today, but sounds metal)
HMS Courageous
Glad you mentioned Courageous. TS Courageous was my SCC unit. I have just taken a glance at the plaque showing the fist grabbing ‘hissing Sid’ by the neck that still sits on one of my shelves. Off now to give it a polish.
Each one of these is like another stab in the heart of the Russian Navy. Incredible machines and capability. The maintenance backlog has been a major headache, but things are moving in the right direction on that front. Still, it doesn’t take away from these Incredible feats of engineering.
Indeed, with six boats HMG should now be aiming for a 3 boat readiness level as soon as it can.
We know Asute is going to be out for a couple of years and will probably not be back till 28, as well as storerobed Ambush being out probably till the very late 20s
But the other 4 boats are as I understand it coming towards readiness, on trials or needing lower level maintenance.
1SL was absolutely correct to make restoring SSN availability level top priority.
One thing Mad Vlad is afraid of as the only reasonable things he has are his submarines.
Giving a whole new meaning to just in time. Any longer in build and she would have missed the war.
Shouldn’t it be the non-operational RN submarine service?
A new sub is excellent but do we have the crews? Also, when do we get Agincourt?
If we were building submarines at this pace in 1939, they would have been ready just in time for the tail-end of the Korean war.